Twitter has emerged as a key news source, but questions remain about the ethics of relying on it as a source and the implications of such reliance for audience impressions. Two experiments test perceptions of news attributed to Twitter. Study 1 (N = 699) tests the effects of quoting from Twitter and showing actual tweets. The results suggest minimal influences on credibility or quality perceptions. Study 2 (N = 311) tests the equivalence of quotes attributed to various sources and investigates the effects of attributing the origin of a news story to Twitter. Results suggest that visual representations of tweets may have a negative effect, but otherwise perceptual effects remain minimal.
AppelmanASundarSS (2016) Measuring message credibility: Construction and validation of an exclusive scale. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly93(1): 59–79.
2.
ArceneauxNSchmitz WeissA (2010) Seems stupid until you try it: Press coverage of Twitter, 2006–9. New Media & Society12(8): 1262–1279.
BerinskyAJHuberGALenzGS (2012) Evaluating online labor markets for experimental research: Amazon.com’s Mechanical Turk. Political Analysis20(3): 351–368.
6.
BodeL (2016) Political news in the news feed: Learning politics from social media. Mass Communication and Society19(1): 24–48.
7.
BrantnerCLobingerKWetzsteinI (2011) Effects of visual framing on emotional responses and evaluations of news stories about the Gaza conflict 2009. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly88(3): 523–540.
8.
BroersmaMGrahamT (2012) Social media as beat. Journalism Practice6(3): 403–419.
9.
BrunsABurgessJ (2012) Researching news discussion on Twitter. Journalism Studies13(5–6): 801–814.
10.
BucherHJSchumacherP (2006) The relevance of attention for selecting news content. An eye-tracking study on attention patterns in the reception of print and online media. Communications31(3): 347–368.
11.
ChenGM (2011) Tweet this: A uses and gratifications perspective on how active Twitter use gratifies a need to connect with others. Computers in Human Behavior27(2): 755–762.
ClaeysASCaubergheVVynckeP (2010) Restoring reputations in times of crisis: An experimental study of the situational crisis communication theory and the moderating effects of locus of control. Public Relations Review36(3): 256–262.
14.
CohenJ (1988) Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, 2nd ed. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
15.
DardisFHaighMM (2009) Prescribing versus describing: Testing image restoration strategies in a crisis situation. Corporate Communications: An International Journal14(1): 101–118.
FarkasGVicknairK (1996) Appropriate tests of racial wage discrimination require controls for cognitive skill: Comment on Cancio, Evans, and Maume. American Sociological Review61(4): 557.
18.
FaulFErdfelderELangAG, et al. (2007) G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods39(2): 175–191.
19.
FlanaginAJMetzgerMJ (2000) Perceptions of Internet information credibility. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly77(3): 515–540.
20.
GolanG (2006) Inter-media agenda setting and global news coverage. Journalism Studies7(2): 323–333.
HarderRAPaulussenSVan AelstP (2016) Making sense of Twitter buzz. Digital Journalism4(7): 933–943.
23.
HeraviBRHarrowerN (2016) Twitter journalism in Ireland: Sourcing and trust in the age of social media. Information, Communication & Society19(9): 1194–1213.
24.
HughesALPalenL (2009) Twitter adoption and use in mass convergence and emergency events. International Journal of Emergency Management6(3/4): 248.
25.
JahngMRLittauJ (2016) Interacting is believing. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly93(1): 38–58.
26.
JohnsonTKayeB (2004) Wag the blog: How reliance on traditional media and the Internet influence credibility perceptions of weblogs among blog users. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly81(3): 622–642.
27.
JohnsonTKayeB (2010) Choosing is believing? How web gratifications and reliance affect Internet credibility among politically interested users. Atlantic Journal of Communication18(1): 1–21.
28.
JohnsonTKayeBBichardSL, et al. (2007) Every blog has its day: Politically-interested Internet users’ perceptions of blog credibility. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication13(1): 100–122.
29.
JohnsonTJKayeBK (2009) In blog we trust? Deciphering credibility of components of the internet among politically interested internet users. Computers in Human Behavior25(1): 175–182.
30.
KhondkerHH (2011) Role of the new media in the Arab Spring. Globalizations8(5): 675–679.
31.
KiousisSPopescuCMitrookM (2007) Understanding influence on corporate reputation: An examination of public relations efforts, media coverage, public opinion, and financial performance from an agenda-building and agenda-setting perspective. Journal of Public Relations Research19(2): 147–165.
32.
KononovaAAkbarM (2015) Interpersonal communication, media exposure, opinion leadership, and perceived credibility of news and advertising during the December 2012 parliamentary election in Kuwait. International Journal of Communication9: 1206–1228.
33.
KruikemeierSLechelerS (2016) News consumer perceptions of new journalistic sourcing techniques. Journalism Studies, Taylor & Francis19(5): 632–649.
34.
LandrevilleKDWhiteCAllenS (2015) Tweets, polls, and quotes: Gatekeeping and bias in on-screen visuals during the final 2012 presidential debate. Communication Studies66(2): 146–164.
35.
LasorsaDLLewisSCHoltonAE (2012) Normalizing Twitter: Journalism practice in an emerging communication space. Journalism Studies13(1): 19–36.
36.
LawrenceRGMolyneuxLCoddingtonM, et al. (2014) Tweeting conventions. Journalism Studies15(6): 789–806.
37.
LevayKEFreeseJDruckmanJN (2016) The Demographic and Political Composition of Mechanical Turk Samples. SAGE Open6(1): 1–17.
38.
LimJ (2006) A cross-lagged analysis of agenda setting among online news media. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly83(2): 298–312.
39.
McLeodDM (1995) Communicating deviance: The effects of television news coverage of social protest. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media39(1): 4–19.
40.
McLeodDMHertogJK (1992) The manufacture of ‘public opinion’ by reporters: Informal cues for public perceptions of protest groups. Discourse & Society3(3): 259–275.
41.
McLeodDMHertogJK (1999) Social control and the mass media’s role in the regulation of protest groups: The communicative acts perspective. In: DemersDViswanathK (eds) Mass Media, Social Control and Social Change. Ames: Iowa State University Press, pp. 305–330.
42.
MeyerKMTangT (2015) #SocialJournalism: Local news media on Twitter. International Journal on Media Management17(4): 241–257.
MoloneyK (2005) Trust and public relations: Center and edge. Public Relations Review31(4): 550–555.
45.
MorrisDS (2018) Twitter versus the traditional media: A survey experiment comparing public perceptions of campaign messages in the 2016 U.S. presidential election. Social Science Computer Review36(4): 456–468.
46.
MorrisMRCountsSRosewayA, et al. (2012) Tweeting is believing? In: Proceedings of the ACM 2012 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work - CSCW ‘12, p. 441. New York: ACM Press.
47.
OsborneMDredzeM (2014) Facebook, Twitter and Google Plus for Breaking News: Is There a Winner? In: Proceedings of the 8th International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, 611–614.
48.
OttBL (2017) The age of Twitter: Donald J. Trump and the politics of debasement. Critical Studies in Media Communication34(1): 59–68.
49.
PaulussenSHarderRA (2014) Social media references in newspapers. Journalism Practice8(5): 542–551.
50.
ParkHCameronGT (2014) Keeping it real: Exploring the roles of conversational human voice and source credibility in crisis communication via blogs. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly91(3): 487–507.
51.
PayneGADozierDM (2013) Readers’ view of credibility similar for online, print. Newspaper Research Journal34(4): 54–67.
52.
SchmierbachMOeldorf-HirschA (2012) A little bird told me, so I didn’t believe it: Twitter, credibility, and issue perceptions. Communication Quarterly60(3): 317–337.
53.
VeenstraASIyerNParkCS, et al. (2015) Twitter as ‘a journalistic substitute’? Examining #wiunion tweeters’ behavior and self-perception. Journalism16(4): 488–504.
54.
WasikeB (2017) Persuasion in 140 characters: Testing issue framing, persuasion and credibility via Twitter and online news articles in the gun control debate. Computers in Human Behavior66: 179–190.
55.
WeberRPopovaL (2012) Testing equivalence in communication research: Theory and application. Communication Methods and Measures6(3): 190–213.
56.
WillemsenLMNeijensPCBronnerF (2012) The ironic effect of source identification on the perceived credibility of online product reviewers. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication18(1): 16–31.
57.
WinterSKrämerNC (2014) A question of credibility – Effects of source cues and recommendations on information selection on news sites and blogs. Communications39(4): 435–456.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
