This article analyzes young preteens’ uses and understandings of virtual world games, with a focus on the structures that create different online experiences. The study involved working with a group of 28 children aged 8 to 10 years. Data analyzed in this article are paper-based activities, semistructured interviews, and field notes. The article investigates dominant constructions of children as ‘not yet complete’ and as ‘active, knowing beings’ (Cook, 2005). These dichotomous constructions are explored across the literature concerning children and virtual world games, particularly in relation to online risks and opportunities. The analysis focuses on ways data collected for this project challenge constructions of children as either at risk or active and empowered. The analysis reveals that many children’s online engagements in virtual world games are casual (i.e. they are not investing time or money in the games) and structured by factors such as age, socioeconomic status, and Internet access. The article suggests that studies of children online need to distinguish between different digital childhoods, particularly in relation to research and policy suggestions.
BlackR (2010) The language of Webkinz: early childhood literacy in an online virtual world. Digital Culture and Education2(1): 7–24.
4.
BloomfieldRDuranskeB (2009) Protecting children in virtual worlds without undermining their economic, educational, and social benefits. Washington and Lee Law Review66(3): 1175–1213.
5.
BuckinghamD (2011) The Material Child: Growing up in Consumer Culture. Cambridge: Polity.
6.
BurnettCMerchantG (2014) Points of view: reconceptualising literacies through an exploration of adult and child interactions in a virtual world. Journal of Research in Reading37(1): 36–50.
7.
CalvertS (2008) Children as consumers: advertising and marketing. The Future of Children: Children and Electronic Media18(1): 205–234.
8.
CarringtonV (2013) Barbies and chimps: text and childhoods in virtual worlds. In: MerchantGGillenJMarshJDaviesJ (eds) Virtual Literacies: Interactive Spaces for Children and Young People. London: Routledge, pp. 41–56.
9.
CarringtonVHodgettsK (2010) Literacy-lite in barbiegirls. British Journal of Sociology of Education31(6): 671–682.
10.
CharmazK (2000) Grounded theory: objectivist and constructivist methods. In: DenzinNKLincolnYS (eds) Handbook of Qualitative Research. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage, pp. 509–535.
ColemanJ (2011) The Nature of Adolescence. 4th ed. New York: Psychology Press.
15.
CookD (2005) The dichotomous child in and of commercial culture. Childhood12(2): 155–159.
16.
EverettA (2005) Serious play: playing with race in contemporary gaming culture. In: RaessensJGoldsteinJ (eds) Handbook of computer game studies. Cambridge: The MIT Press, pp. 312–325.
17.
GillenJ (2009) Literacy practices in Schome Park: a virtual literacy ethnographyJournal of Research in Reading32(1): 57–74.
18.
GlaserBStraussA (1967) The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Chicago: Aldine.
19.
GrimesSFieldsD (2012) Kids Online: a new research agenda for understanding social networking forums. The Joan Ganz Cooney Center at Sesame Workshop.
20.
GrimesSShadeL (2005) Neopian economics of play: children’s cyberpets and online communities as immersive advertising in Neopets.com. International Journal of Media and Cultural Politics1(2): 181–198.
21.
LeonardD (2006) Not a hater, just keepin’ it real: the importance of race- and gender-based game studies. Games and Culture1(
1
): 83–88.
22.
HammersleyMAtkinsonP (2007) Ethnography: Principles in Practice. New York: Routledge.
23.
HasebrinkULivingstoneSHaddonL. (2009) Comparing Children’s Online Opportunities and Risks Across Europe: Cross-national Comparisons for EU Kids Online. LSE, London: EU Kids Online.
24.
ItoMBaumerSBittantiM. (2010) Hanging Out, Messing Around, Geeking Out: Living and Learning with New Media. Cambridge: MIT Press.
25.
JacksonLGauntlettDSteemersJ (2008) Children in Virtual Worlds: Adventure Rock Users and Producers Study. Communication and Media Research Institute, University of Westminster.
KafaiY (2008) Gender play in a Tween gaming club. In: KafaiYHeeterCDennerJSunJ (eds) Beyond Barbie and Mortal Kombat: New Perspectives on Gender and Gaming. Cambridge: MIT Press, pp. 111–124.
29.
KafaiYCookMFieldsD (2010) ‘Blacks deserve bodies too!’ Discussion and design about diversity and race in a tween virtual world. Games and Culture5(1): 43–63.
30.
KafaiYFieldsDGiangM (2009) Transgressive gender play: profiles and portraits of girl players in a Tween virtual world. In Breaking New Ground: Innovation in Games, Play, Practice and Theory: Proceedings of DiGRA. West London: Brunel University.
31.
LivingstoneS (2009) Children and the Internet: Great Expectations, Challenging Realities. Cambridge: Polity.
32.
LivingstoneSHelsperE (2007) Gradations in digital inclusion: children, young people and the digital divide. New Media & Society9(
4
): 671–696.
33.
LivingstoneSHaddonLGorzigA (2012) Children, Risk and Safety on the Internet: Research and Policy Challenges in Comparative Perspective. Bristol: Policy Press.
34.
MarshJ (2008) Out-of-school play in online virtual worlds and the implications for literacy learning. Paper presented at the Centre for Studies in Literacy, Policy, and Learning Cultures, University of South Australia, July 2008.
35.
MarshJ (2010) Young children’s play in online virtual worlds. Journal of Early Childhood8(
1
): 23–39.
36.
MarshJ (2011) Young children’s literacy practices in a virtual world: establishing an online interaction order. Reading Research Quarterly46(2): 101–118.
37.
MarshJ (2013) Countering chaos in Club Penguin: young children’s literacy practices in a virtual world. In: MerchantGGillenJMarshJDaviesJ (eds) Virtual Literacies: Interactive Spaces for Children and Young People. London: Routledge, pp. 75–88.
38.
MerchantG (2009) Literacy in virtual worlds. Journal of Research in Reading32(
1
): 38–56.
39.
MerchantGGillenJMarshJ. (eds) (2013) Virtual Literacies: Interactive Spaces for Children and Young People. London: Routledge.
40.
MeyersE (2009) Tip of the iceberg: meaning, identity, and literacy in preteen virtual worlds. Journal of Education for Library and Information Science50(4): 226–234.
41.
MeyersENathanLUnsworthK (2010) Who’s watching your kids? Privacy and surveillance in virtual worlds for children. Journal of Virtual Worlds Research3(2): 4–28.
42.
ReichSBlackR (2012) Missed opportunities on Webkinz when developmental abilities are not considered. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology33(3): 136–145.
43.
RideoutVFoehrUGRobertsD (2010) Generation M2: Media in the Lives of 8- to 18-Year-Olds. Menlo Park, CA: Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation.
44.
RyanGBernardH (2003) Techniques to identify themes. Field Methods15: 85–109.
45.
SteinkuehlerC (2007) Massively multiplayer online gaming as a constellation of literacy practices. eLearning4(
3
): 297–318.
46.
van DijkJ (2005) The Deepening Divide: Inequality in the Information Society. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
47.
WohlwendK (2010) A is for avatar literacy: young children in literacy 2.0 worlds and literacy 1.0 schools. Language Arts88(2): 144–152.
48.
WaskoJ (2010) Children’s virtual worlds: the latest commercialization of children’s culture. In: BuckinghamDTingstadV (eds) Childhood and Consumer Culture. Basingstoke: Palgrave, pp. 113–129.
49.
YounessJSmollarJ (1985) Adolescent Relations with Mothers, Fathers and Friends. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
