This article examines the distribution of expertise in the performance of ‘digital housekeeping’ required to maintain a networked home. It considers the labours required to maintain a networked home, the forms of digital expertise that are available and valued in digital housekeeping, and ways in which expertise is gendered in distribution amongst household members. As part of this discussion, we consider how digital housekeeping implicitly situates technology work within the home in the role of the ‘housekeeper’, a term that is complicated by gendered sensitivities. Digital housework, like other forms of domestic labour, contributes to identity and self-worth. The concept of housework also affords visibility of the digital housekeeper’s enrolment in the project of maintaining the household. This article therefore asks, what is at stake in the gendered distribution of digital housekeeping?
AlbertsJKTracySJTretheweyA (2011) An integrative theory of the division of domestic labor: threshold level, social organizing and sensemaking. Journal of Family Communication11(1): 21–38.
2.
ArrighiBAMaumeDJ (2000) Workplace subordination and men’s avoidance of housework. Journal of Family Issues21: 464–487.
3.
AuneM (1996) The computer in everyday life – patterns of domestication of a new technology. In: LieMSørensenKH (eds) Making Technology our Own? – Domesticating Technology into Everyday Life. Oslo: Scandinavian University Press, pp. 91–120.
4.
Australian Bureau of Statistics (1997) Unpaid work and the Australian economy, cat. no. 5240.0, Canberra: ABS.
5.
Australian Bureau of Statistics (2006) How Australians use their time, cat. no. 4153.0, Canberra: ABS.
6.
Australian Bureau of Statistics (2009) Trends in household work, Australia, cat. no 4102.0, Canberra: ABS.
7.
BakardjievaM (2005) Internet Society: The Internet in Everyday Life. London: Routledge.
8.
BassettC (2013) Feminism, expertise and the computational turn. In: ThornhamHWeissmannE (eds) Renewing Feminism: Radical Narratives, Fantasies and Futures in Media Studies. London and New York: IB Tauris and Co Ltd, pp. 199–214.
BellGBlytheMSengersP (2005) Making by making strange: defamiliarization and the design of domestic technologiesACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI)12(2): 149–173.
11.
BergAJ (1997) Digital Feminism. Dragvoll, Norway: Senter for Teknologi of Samfum, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Rapport nr. 28.
12.
BergmanSvan ZoonenL (1999) Fishing with false teeth: women, gender and the internet. In: DowneyJMcGuiganJ (eds) Technocities. London: Sage, pp. 90–107.
13.
BlytheMMonkA (2002) Notes towards an ethnography of domestic technology. In: Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (DIS), 2002. New York: ACM, pp. 277–281.
14.
CellierJEyrolleHMarineC (1997) Expertise in dynamic environments. Ergonomics40: 28–50.
15.
CockburnC (1983) Brothers: Male Dominance and Technological Change. London: Pluto Press.
16.
CockburnC (1985) Machinery of Dominance: Women, Men and Technical Know-How. London: Pluto Press.
17.
CowanRS (1983) More Work for Mother: The Ironies of Household Technology from the Open Hearth to the Microwave. New York: Basic Books.
18.
CunninghamM (2007) Influences of women’s employment on the gendered division of household labor over the life course: evidence from a 31-year panel study. Journal of Family Issues28: 422–444.
19.
EwingSThomasJ (2012) CCi Digital Futures 2012: The Internet in Australia. Australia: ARC Centre of Excellence for Creative Industries and Innovation.
20.
Farrington-DarbyTWilsonJR (2006) The nature of expertise: a review. Applied Ergonomics37(1): 17–32.
21.
FleckJTierneyM (1991) The management of expertise: knowledge, power and the economics of expert labour. Edinburgh PICT Working Paper29. Edinburgh: Research Centre for Social Sciences, University of Edinburgh.
22.
GauntlettDHillA (1999) TV Living: Television, Culture and Everyday Life. London: Routledge.
23.
GiddensA (1991) Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age. Cambridge: Polity Press.
24.
GlaserRChiM (1988) Overview. In: ChiMGlaserRFarrM (eds) The Nature of Expertise. Hillside: Erlbaum, pp. xv–xxxvi.
25.
GrayA (1992) Video Playtime: The Gendering of a Leisure Technology. London: Routledge.
26.
GrinterREEdwardsWKNewmanM. (2005) The work to make the home network work. In: Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (ECSCW) 1995 (eds HGellersenKSchmidtMBeaudouin-LafonWMackay), Paris, France, 18-22 September 2005. Paris: Springer.
27.
HaddonL (2003) Domestication and mobile telephony. In: KatzJ (ed) Machines that Become Us: The Social Context of Personal Communication Technology. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers, pp. 43–56.
28.
HaddonL (2004) Information and Communication Technologies in Everyday Life: A Concise Introduction and Research Guide. Oxford: Berg.
29.
HahnMWilkinsR (2014) Families, Incomes and Jobs, Volume 9: A Statistical Report on Waves 1 to 11 of the Household, Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia Survey. Melbourne: Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, University of Melbourne.
30.
HochschildAMachungA (1989) The Second Shift: Working Parents and the Revolution at Home. New York: Viking.
31.
JohnsonLLloydJ (2004) Sentenced to Everyday Life: Feminism and the Housewife. Oxford: Berg.
32.
Lachance-GrzelaMBouchardG (2010) Why do women do the lion’s share of housework? A decade of research. Sex Roles63(11–12): 767–780.
33.
LallyE (2002) At Home with Computers. Oxford: Berg.
34.
MalosE (ed) (1975) The Politics of Housework. New York: The New Clarion Press.
35.
McNeilM (1998) Gender, expertise and feminism. In: WilliamsRFaulknerWFleckJ (eds) Exploring Expertise: Issues and perspectives. Basingstoke: Macmillan, pp. 55–79.
36.
MillerD (2010) Stuff. Cambridge: Polity
37.
MillerD (2012) Consumption and its Consequences. Cambridge: Polity.
38.
MorleyD (1986) Family Television: Cultural Power and Domestic Leisure. London: Comedia.
39.
NatalierK (2003) ‘I’m not his wife’: doing gender and doing housework in the absence of women. Journal of Sociology39(3): 253–269.
40.
PhillipsATaylorB (1980) Sex and skill: notes towards a feminist economics. Feminist Review6(1): 79–88.
41.
PiersonJ (2005) Domestication at work in small businesses. In: BerkerTHartmannMPunieYWardK (eds) Domestication of Media and Technologies. Maidenhead: Open University Press, pp. 205–226.
42.
ShanteauJ (1992) The psychology of experts: an alternative view. In: WrightGBolgerF (eds) Expertise and Decision Support. New York: Plenum Press, pp. 11–23.
43.
SilverstoneRHirschE (eds) (1992) Consuming Technologies: Media and Information in Domestic Spaces. Hove: Psychology Press.
44.
SilverstoneRHaddonL (1996) Design and the domestication of information and communication technologies: technical change and everyday life. In: SilverstoneRMansellR (eds) Communication by Design: The Politics of Information and Communication Technologies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 44–74.
45.
SpigelL (2001) Media homes: then and now. International Journal of Cultural Studies4(4): 285–411.
46.
TolmiePCrabtreeARoddenT. (2007) Making the home network at home: digital housekeeping. In: ECSCW 2007: Proceedings of the 10th European Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work (eds LBannonIWagnerCGutwinRHarperKSchmidt), Limerick, Ireland, 24–28 September 2007. Paris: Springer.
47.
UrenaC (2004) Skill acquisition in ballet dancers: the relationship between deliberate practice and expertise. PhD Thesis, Florida State University, Florida.
48.
VogelL (1995) Woman Questions: Essays for a Materialist Feminism. New York: Routledge.
WalkerJBellamyR (eds) (1993) The Remote Control in the New Age of Television. Westport: Praeger Publishers.
51.
WardK (2005) Internet consumption in Ireland – towards a ‘connected’ life. In: SilverstoneR (ed) Media, Technology and Everyday Life in Europe. Aldershot: Ashgate, pp. 107–123.
52.
WebsterJ (2014) Shaping Women’s Work: Gender, Employment and Information Technology. London and New York: Routledge.
53.
XiaoYMilgramPDoyleJ (1997) Capturing and modeling planning expertise in anesthesiology: results of a field study. In: ZsambokCKleinG (eds) Naturalistic Decision Making. Hillside: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 197–205.
