In this essay, we explore the aesthetic possibilities that are opened up by datamoshing, a practice whereby audiovisual artists actively downgrade the quality of digital images in order to render a more ‘raw’ aesthetic on screen. We follow this up by exploring the ways in which datamoshing as a practice (together with ‘glitch art’ more generally) highlights the decay that digital images undergo over time. Because it takes place through the deliberate compression of images, we here argue that the aforementioned loss of quality is an ‘artistic’ form of entropy, which leads us to the possibility for a theory of ‘digital chaos’. However, since the loss of data is reworked by artists in order to create new forms, we argue that this is a form of digital ‘emergence’ of ‘order out of chaos’, or ‘digital complexity’.
AbbasA (2006) The New Hong Kong cinema and the Déjà Disparu. In: EleftheriotisDNeedhamG (eds) Asian Cinemas: A Reader and Guide. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, pp. 72–99.
2.
BenjaminW (2004 [1935]) The work of art in the age of mechanical reproduction. In: BraudyLCohenM (eds) Film Theory and Criticism: Introductory Readings (6th edn). Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 791–811.
3.
BergsonH (1944 [1911]) Creative Evolution (trans. AMitchell). London: Modern Library.
4.
BordwellD (2002) Intensified continuity: Visual style in contemporary American film. Film Quarterly55(3): 16–28.
5.
BordwellD (2006) The Way Hollywood Tells It: Story and Style in Modern Movies, Berkeley: University of California Press.
6.
Cherchi UsaiP (2001) The Death of Cinema: History, Cultural Memory and the Digital Dark Age. London: British Film Institute.
7.
CohenJStewartI (1994) The Collapse of Chaos: Discovering Simplicity in a Complex World, London: Penguin.
8.
DavisD (1995) The Work of Art in the Age of Digital Reproduction: An Evolving Thesis 1991–1995. Available at: http://cristine.org/borders/Davis_Essay.html(accessed March 2010).
9.
DeleuzeG (2005a) Cinema 1: The Movement Image (trans. HTomlinsonBHabberjam). London: Continuum.
10.
DeleuzeG (2005b) Cinema 2: The Time Image (trans. HTomlinsonRGaleta). London: Continuum.
DeleuzeGGuattariF (2002) A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia (trans. BMassumi). London and New York: Continuum.
13.
FullerM (2005) Media Ecologies: Materialist Energies in Art and Technoculture. Cambridge, MA and London: MIT Press.
14.
GaudreaultA (1990) Showing and telling: Image and word in early cinema (trans. J Howe). In: ElsaesserTBarkerA (eds) Early Cinema: Space, Frame, Narrative. London: British Film Institute, pp. 274–281.
15.
GleickJ (1998) Chaos: The Amazing Science of the Unpredictable. London: Vintage.
16.
GoodmanS (2008) Timeline (Sonic). In: FullerM (ed.) Software Studies: A Lexicon. Cambridge, MA and London: MIT Press, pp. 256–259.
17.
GoriunovaOShulginA (2008) Glitch. In: FullerM (ed.) Software Studies: A Lexicon. Cambridge, MA and London: MIT Press, pp. 111–114.
18.
GreeneB (2000) The Elegant Universe: Superstrings, Hidden Dimensions, and the Quest for the Ultimate Theory. London: Vintage.
19.
HansenM (1987) Benjamin, cinema, and experience: ‘The blue flower in the land of technology’. New German Critique40(winter): 179–224.
20.
HansenMB (2004) Room-for-play: Benjamin’s gamble with cinema. Canadian Journal of Film Studies13(1): 2–27.
21.
KeaneS (2007) CineTech: Film, Convergence and New Media. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
22.
MackenzieA (2002) Tranductions: Bodies and Machines at Speed. London and New York: Continuum.
23.
MalinaRF (1990) Digital image, digital cinema: The work of art in the age of post-mechanical reproduction. Leonardo Supplemental Issue3(Digital Image, Digitial Cinema: SIGGRAPH ’90 Art Show Catalog): 33–38.
24.
ManovichL (2001) The Language of New Media. Cambridge, MA and London: MIT Press.
25.
MaturanaHJVarelaFJ (1980) Autopoiesis and Cognition: The Realization of the Living. Boston, MA and London: Reidel.
26.
MitchellWJT (2003) The work of art in the age of biocybernetic reproduction. Modernism/modernity10(3): 481–500.
