Comparing situated sense-making processes in virtual worlds

Abstract

What happens when a person engages with a virtual world? Are there unique processes of engagings that occur? One approach to understanding how a person makes sense of a virtual world is to compare the engaging processes with other media technologies, focusing on situated performative and interpretive sense-makings. This article reports on a study conducted to compare how novices make sense of four media technologies: film, console videogames, massively multiplayer online role-playing games, and social virtual worlds. Using Dervin’s Sense-Making Methodology (SMM) and our conceptualization of media reception situations, we extracted five potential overlapping sense-making concepts to make comparisons that do not presume a priori the influences of characteristics of technologies and other structures. The five comparative concepts all focus on situated sense-making processes. Our purpose in this article is not to present a full study report but rather to illustrate the methodological approach used in the data collection/production and analysis of the study. Results of our analyses indicate the complexity of media reception situations, how they converged and diverged, and how they involve multiple potential influences on media reception outcomes.

Keywords

engaging interpretive mapping methodology narratives performative sense-making situationality

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Antonietti

Cantoia

(2000) To see a painting versus to walk in a painting: An experiment on sense-making through virtual reality. Computers in Education 34 (3–4): 213–223.

Bailenson

Patel

Nielse

Bajscy

Jung

Kurillo

(2008) The effect of interactivity on learning physical actions in virtual reality. Media Psychology 11(3): 354–376.

Bideau

Kulpa

Ménardais

Fradet

Multon

Delamarche

Arnaldi

(2003) Real handball goalkeeper vs. virtual handball thrower. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 12(4): 411–422.

Carter

(2003) Communication, a harder science. In: Dervin

Chaffee

(eds) Communication, a Different Kind of Horse Race. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press, 369–376.

Castronova

Williams

Shen

Ratan

Xiong

Huang

Keegan

(2009) As real as real? Macroeconomic behaviour in a large-scale virtual world. New Media and Society 11(5): 685–707.

Chappell

Eatough

Davies

MNO

Griffiths

(2006) EverQuest – It’s just a computer game right? An interpretive phenomenological analysis of online gaming addiction. International Journal of Mental Health Addiction 4(3): 205–216.

Crawford

Gosling

(2009) More than a game: Sports-themed video games and player narratives. Sociology of Sport Journal 26(1): 50–66.

Dervin

(2008) Interviewing as dialectical practice: Sense-Making Methodology as exemplar. Paper presented at International Association of Media and Communication Research, Stockholm, July.

Dervin

Foreman-Wernet

(2003) Sense-Making Methodology Reader: Selected Writings of Brenda Dervin. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.

10.

Dervin

Song

(2005) Reaching for phenomenological depths in uses and gratifications research: A quantitative empirical investigation. Paper presented at the International Communication Association, New York City, May.

11.

DeVane

Squire

(2008) The meaning of race and violence in Grand Theft Auto. Games and Culture 3 (3–4): 264–285.

12.

Dill

Brown

Collins

(2008) Effects of exposure to sex-stereotyped video game characters on tolerance of sexual harassment. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 44(5): 1402–1408.

13.

Dovey

Lister

(2009) Straw men or cyborgs? Interactions: Studies in Communication and Culture 1(1): 129–145.

14.

Dworkin

Foreman-Wernet

Dervin

(1999) Sense-Making and television news: An inquiry into audience interpretations. The Electronic Journal of Communication 9(2, 3 and 4). URL (accessed 17 August 2011): http://www.cios.org/www/ejcmain.htm.

15.

Eastin

Appiah

Cicchirillo

(2009) Identification and the influence of cultural stereotyping on postvideogame play hostility. Human Communication Research 35(3): 337–356.

16.

Flannery

Walles

(2003) How does schema theory apply to real versus virtual memories? Cyberpsychology and Behavior 6(2): 151–159.

17.

Foreman-Wernet

Dervin

(2004) A study comparing audience uses of the arts and popular culture: Applying a common methodological framework. Paper presented at the Social Theory, Politics, and the Arts Conference, Arlington, Virginia , October.

18.

Funk

(2001) Girls just want to have fun. URL (retrieved 15 April 2005): http://culturalpolicy.uchicago.edu/conf2001/papers/funk2.html.

19.

Giddings

(2009) Events and collusions: A glossary for the microethnography of video game play. Games and Culture 4(2): 144–157.

20.

Golub

(2010) Being in the World (of Warcraft): Raiding, realism, and knowledge production in a Massively Multiplayer Online Game. Anthropological Quarterly 83(1): 17–45.

21.

Greibel

(2006) Self-portrayal in a simulated life: Projecting personality and values in The Sims 2. Game Studies 6(1). URL (accessed 17 August 2011): http://gamestudies.org/0601/articles/griebel.

22.

Griffiths

Davies

MNO

Chappell

(2004) Demographic factors and playing variables in online computer gaming. CyberPsychology and Behavior 7(4): 479–487.

23.

Hermes

(2009) Audience Studies 2.0: On the theory, politics and method of qualitative audience research. Interactions: Studies in Communication and Culture 1(1): 111–127.

24.

Höijer

(1990) Studying viewers’ reception of television programmes: Theoretical and methodological considerations. European Journal of Communication 5(1): 29–56.

25.

Höijer

(2000) Audiences’ expectations and interpretations of different television genres: A sociocognitive approach. In: Hagen

Wasko

(eds) Consuming Audiences? Production and reception in media research. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press, 165–207.

26.

Höijer

(2008) Ontological assumptions and generalizations in qualitative (audience) research. European Journal of Communication 23(3): 275–294.

27.

Huesca

Dervin

(2003) Hypertext and journalism: Audiences respond to competing news narratives. In: Jenkins

Thorburn

(eds) Democracy and New Media. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 281–307.

28.

Jensen

(1987) Qualitative audience research: Toward an integrative approach to reception. Critical Studies in Mass Communication 4(1): 21–36.

29.

Jensen

Rosengren

(1990) Five traditions in search of the audience. European Journal of Communication 5: 207–238.

30.

Klimmt

Schmid

Nosper

Hartmann

Vorderer

(2006) How players manage moral concerns to make video game violence enjoyable. Communications 31(3): 309–328.

31.

Malpas

(2009) On the non-autonomy of the virtual. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies 15(2): 135–139.

32.

Mania

Chalmers

(2001) The effects of levels of immersion on memory and presence in virtual environments: A reality centered approach. Cyberpsychology and Behavior 4(2): 247–264.

33.

Østerud

(2000) How can audience research overcome the divide between macro- and microanalyses, between social structure and action? In: Hagen

Wasko

(eds) Consuming Audiences? Production and Reception in Media Research. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press, 123–143.

34.

Reinhard

(2008) Gendered media engagings as user agency mediations with sociocultural and media structures: A Sense-Making Methodology study of the situationality of gender divergences and convergences. Doctoral dissertation, Ohio State University.

35.

Reinhard

(2010) Interviews within experimental frameworks: How to make sense of sense-making in virtual worlds. Journal of Virtual Worlds Research 3(1). URL (accessed 17 August 2011): http://jvwresearch.org.

36.

Reinhard

(2011) Reception studies and virtual worlds: Comparing engagings. In: Zagalo

Morgado

Boa-Ventura

(eds) Virtual Worlds, Second Life and Metaverse Platforms: New Communication and Identity Paradigms. Hershey, PA: IGI Global, 117–136.

37.

Reinhard

Dervin

(2010) Situations of media engagings: Comparing the new and the old through sense-making. Paper presented at AOIR Conference IR 11.0 in Goteborg, Sweden, October.

38.

Reinhard

Dervin

(in press) Application of Dervin’s Sense-Making Methodology to Media Reception Studies. In: Valdivia

Parameswaran

(eds) International Companions to Media Studies. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.

39.

Schneiderman

Plaisant

Cohen

Jacobs

(2009) Designing the User Interface: Strategies for Effective Human-Computer Interaction (5th edn). Boston, MA: Addison-Wesley.

40.

Shields

(1999) Advertising to the gendered audience: Using Sense-Making to illustrate how audiences decode advertisements of idealized female bodies. The Electronic Journal of Communication 9(2, 3, and 4). URL (accessed 17 August 2011): http://www.cios.org/www/ejcmain.htm.

41.

Slater

(2003) Alienation, aggression, and sensation seeking as predictors of adolescent use of violent film, computer, and website content. Journal of Communication 53(1): 105–121.

42.

Smyth

(2007) Beyond self-selection in video game play: An experimental examination of the consequences of massively multiplayer online role-playing game play, Cyberpsychology and Behavior 10(5): 717–721.

43.

Spirek

Dervin

Nilan

Martin

(1999) Bridging gaps between audience and media: A Sense-Making comparison of reader information needs in life-facing versus newspaper reading contexts. The Electronic Journal of Communication 9(2, 3 and 4). URL (accessed 17 August 2011): http://www.cios.org/www/ejcmain.htm.

44.

Staiger

(2005) Media Reception Studies. New York: New York University Press.

45.

Steinkuehler

(2007) Massively multiplayer online gaming as a constellation of literacy practices. E-Learning and Digital Media 4(3). URL (accessed 17 August 2011): http://www.wwwords.co.uk/rss/abstract.asp?j=elea&aid=3122.