This article revisits the nature and governance implications of the convergence phenomenon more than a decade after it gained major prominence in politics and research. It analyses the reforms undertaken in reaction to convergence, outlines their common features, and argues that a worldwide trend towards a modified common governance pattern for convergent communications markets is emerging. The major constituent components include integrated strategies, control structures and legal frameworks for the convergent communications sector; a technology-neutral functional taxonomy; a subdivision into transmission and content regulation; and a growing reliance on alternative modes of regulation such as self- and co-regulation.
Baldwin, T.F., McVoy, S.D. and Steinfield, C. ( 1996) Convergence: Integrating Media, Information and Communication . London: SAGE.
2.
Bauer, J.M. ( 2005) ‘Bundling, Differentiation, Alliances, and Mergers: Convergence Strategies in U.S. Communications Markets’, Communications & Strategies60: 59-83.
3.
Bohlin, E., Brodin, K., Lundgren, A. and Thorngren B., eds (2000) Convergence in Communications and Beyond. Amsterdam: Elsevier .
4.
Braman, S., ed. (2003) Communication Researchers and Policy-Making. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
5.
Cherry, B.A. ( 2007) ‘The Telecommunications Economy and Regulation as Coevolving Complex Adaptive Systems: Implications for Federalism’, Federal Communications Law Journal59(2): 369-402.
6.
Cherry, B.A. and Bauer, J.M. ( 2004) ‘Adaptive Regulation: Contours of a Policy Model for the Internet Economy’, paper presented at the 15th Biennial ITS Conference, Berlin, 4-7 September.
7.
Collins, R. and Murroni, C. ( 1996) New Media, New Politics: Media and Communications Strategies for the Future. Cambridge: Polity Press.
8.
COM - European Commission (1997) Towards an Information Society Approach. Green Paper on the Convergence of the Telecommunications, Media and Information Technology Sectors, and the Implications for Regulation. COM (97) 623 final, 3 December 1997, URL (consulted January 2008): http://aei.pitt.edu/1160/01/telecom_convergence_gp_COM_97_623.pdf
9.
COM - European Commission (2007) Reforming the Current Telecom Rules, URL (consulted January 2008): http://ec.europa.eu/information_society/policy/ecomm/tomorrow/index_en.htm
10.
De SolaPool, I. ( 1983) Technologies of Freedom. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.
11.
DLM - Direktorenkonferenz der Landesmedienanstalten, ed. (2007) Dynamische Technik - Medien in der beschleunigten Konvergenz: Dokumentation des DLM-Symposiums vom Dezember 2006, DLM-Band 37 . Berlin: Vistas Verlag.
12.
Dong, H.S. ( 2006) ‘VoIP: A Debate over Information Service or Telephone Application in US: A New Perspective in Convergence Era’, Working Paper, School of Information Sciences and Technology, Pennsylvania State University, Reading.
13.
Garcia-Murillo, M.A. and MacInnes, I. ( 2001) ‘FCC Organizational Structure and Regulatory Convergence’ , Telecommunications Policy25(6): 431-52.
14.
Garnham, N. and Mulgan, G. ( 1991) ‘Broadband and the Barriers to Convergence in theEuropean Community’, Telecommunications Policy15(3): 182-94.
15.
Hasebrink, U. ( 2003) ‘Konvergenz aus Nutzerperspektive. Zur Integration neuer Medien in die Nutzungsmuster von Jugendlichen’, in J. Bug and M. Karmasin (eds) Telekommunikation und Jugendkultur: Eine Einführung , pp. 29-46. Opladen: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
16.
Héritier, A. and Thatcher, M., eds (2002) ‘Regulatory Reform in Europe’, Special Issue of: Journal of European Public Policy9(6): 859-72.
17.
Hoffmann-Riem, W., Schulz, W. and Held, T. ( 2000) Konvergenz und Regulierung: Optionen für rechtliche Regelungen und Aufsichtsstrukturen im Bereich Information, Kommunikation und Medien. Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft .
18.
Höflich, J.R. ( 1999) ‘Der Mythos vom umfassenden Medium. Anmerkungen zur Konvergenz aus einer Nutzerperspektive’, in M. Latzer et al. (eds) Die Zukunft der Kommunikation, Phänomene und Trends in der Informationsgesellschaft, pp. 43-60. Innsbruck, Wien: Studien Verlag.
19.
Iosifidis, P. ( 2002) ‘Digital Convergence: Challenges forEuropean Regulation’, The Public Javnost9(3): 27-48.
20.
Just, N. ( 2005) ‘Competition Policy in Convergent Communication Sectors: Quo vadis?’, conference contribution presented at the 16th ITS Regional Conference, Porto, 4-6 September.
21.
Latzer, M. ( 1997) Mediamatik: Die Konvergenz von Telekommunikation, Computer und Rundfunk. Opladen: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
22.
Latzer, M. ( 1998) ‘European Mediamatics Policies. Coping with Convergence and Globalization’, Telecommunications Policy22(6): 457-66.
23.
Latzer, M. ( 2000) ‘Toward an Integrated Universal Services Policy for the "Mediamatics"-Sector’, in E. Bohlin, K. Brodin, A. Lundgren and B. Thorngeren (eds) Convergence in Communications and Beyond, pp. 301-12. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
24.
Latzer, M. and Saurwein, F. ( 2007) ‘Vertrauen in die Industrie - Vertrauen in die Nutzer: Selbstregulierung und Selbsthilfe bei digitalen Medieninhalten in der EU’, Bericht für die Expertenkonferenz zur europäischen Medienpolitik: ‘Mehr Vertrauen in Inhalte - das Potential von Ko- und Selbstregulierung in den digitalen Medien’, Mai 2007, Leipzig.
25.
Latzer, M., Just, N., Saurwein, F. and Slominski, P. ( 2002) Selbst- und Ko-Regulierung im Mediamatiksektor. Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag.
26.
Latzer, M., Just, N., Saurwein, F. and Slominski, P. ( 2006) ‘Institutional Variety in Communications Regulation Classification scheme and empirical evidence from Austria’, Telecommunications Policy30(3-4): 152-70.
27.
Latzer, M., Maier-Rabler, U., Siegert, G. and Steinmaurer, T., eds (1999) Die Zukunft der Kommunikation: Phänomene und Trends in der Informationsgesellschaft . Innsbruck and Wien: Studien Verlag.
28.
Marsden, C.T. and Verhulst, S.G., eds (1999) Convergence in European Digital TV Regulation. London: Blackstone Press.
29.
McQuail, D. and Siune, K., eds (1998) Media Policy: Convergence, Concentration and Commerce. London, Thousand Oaks, CA, New Delhi: SAGE.
30.
Meier, W.A. ( 1999) ‘Was macht die Publizistik- und Kommunikationswissenschaft mit der Konvergenz?’, in M. Latzer, U. Maier-Rabler, G. Siegert and T. Steinmaurer (eds) Die Zukunft der Kommunikation. Phänomene und Trends in der Informationsgesellschaft , pp. 29-42. Innsbruck and Wien: Studien Verlag.
31.
Mueller, M. ( 1999) ‘Digital Convergence and its Consequences’ , The Public Javnost6(3): 11-28.
32.
Murdock, G. ( 2000) ‘Digital Futures: European Television in the Age of Convergence’, in J. Wieten, G. Murdock, and P. Dahlgren (eds) Television Across Europe: A Comparative Introduction , pp. 35-57. London: SAGE.
33.
Napoli, P.M. ( 2001) Foundations of Communications Policy: Principles and Process in the Regulation of Electronic Media. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
34.
Napoli, P.M. and Gillis, N. ( 2005) ‘Reassessing the Potential Contribution of Communications Research to Communications Policy: The Case of Media Ownership’, paper presented at NCA’s 91st Annual Convention, Boston, 17-20 November.
35.
Nora, S. and Minc, A. ( 1978): L’informatisation de la société. Paris: La Documentation Française.
36.
Oecd (1992) Telecommunications and Broadcasting: Convergence or Collision?Paris: OECD.
37.
Oecd (2003) The Implications of Convergence for Regulation of Electronic Communications: Report to the Working Party on Telecommunication and Information Services Policies. Paris: OECD.
38.
Oecd (2005) Telecommunication Regulatory Institutional Structures and Responsibilities: Report to the Working Party on Telecommunication and Information Services Policies. Paris: OECD.
39.
OTA - Office of Technology Assessment (1990 ) Critical Connections: Communication for the Future. Washington, DC: Congress of the US.
40.
Roßnagel, A., ed. (2005) Neuordnung des Medienrechts: Neuer rechtlicher Rahmen für eine konvergente Technik?Baden-Baden: Nomos.
41.
Scherer, J. ( 1985) Telekommunikationsrecht und Telekommunikationspolitik . Baden-Baden: Nomos.
42.
Schulz, W. and Held, T. ( 2004) Regulated Self-Regulation as a Form of Modern Government . Luton: University of Luton Press .
43.
Simpson, S. ( 2004) ‘Universal Service Issues in Converging Communications Environments: The Case of the UK’, Telecommunications Policy28(3/4): 233-48.
44.
Storsul, T. and Syvertsen, T. ( 2007) ‘The Impact of Convergence on European Television Policy: Pressure for Change - Forces of Stability’, Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies13(3): 275-91.
45.
Van Cuilenburg, J. and McQuail, D. ( 2003) ‘Media Policy Paradigm Shifts. Toward a New Communications Policy Paradigm’, European Journal of Communication18(2): 181-207.
46.
Verhoest, P., ed. (2005) Contradiction, Confusion and Hubris: A Critical Review of European Information Society Policy . ENCIP, URL (consulted January 2008 ): http://www.encip.org/garnham_2.php
Vick, D.W. and G. Doyle ( 2004) ‘Über die "konvergierte" Regulierung zum deregulierten Medienmarkt?’, Media Perpektiven (1): 38-48.
49.
Vowe, G. ( 2006) ‘Kommunikationspolitik’, in G. Bentele, H.-B. Brosius and O. Jarren (eds) Lexikon Kommunikations- und Medienwissenschaft, pp. 130-31. Wiesbaden : VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
50.
Wagner, U., Theunert, H., Gebel, C. and Lauber, A. ( 2004) Zwischen Vereinnahmung und Eigensinn: Konvergenz im Medienalltag Heranwachsender. München: Verlag Reinhard Fischer.
51.
Windahl, S. and McQuail, D. ( 1993) Communication Models, 2nd edition. London: Prentice Hall.
52.
Wu, I. ( 2004) ‘Canada, South Korea, Netherlands and Sweden: Regulatory Implications of the Convergence of Telecommunications, Broadcasting and Internet Services’, Telecommunications Policy28(1): 79-96.
