Abstract
This study examines the estimation of linear regression models for length of stay using on-site versus border-point samples. We show that Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) based on on-site samples is inconsistent, whereas OLS estimators from border-point samples are consistent. However, consistent estimates can be recovered from on-site samples by applying Weighted Least Squares. We also demonstrate that the inconsistency of OLS affects survival models that admit an Accelerated Failure-Time (AFT) specification. These findings challenge the validity of empirical studies relying on on-site samples and linear regression or survival models that admit an AFT formulation.
Keywords
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
