Abstract
In health-related crises, hotels tend to disclose risk-coping measures (RCMs) as a vital element of crisis management. While there has been active research on these measures, much of the work has focused on consumer perceptions and travel intentions. Drawing on signaling theory, we address this gap by rigorously quantifying the underexplored linkage between RCMs disclosure and performance outcomes. Leveraging a quasi-experimental design that combines difference-in-differences method with propensity score matching, we analyze matched hotel samples with/without RCMs disclosure. Our findings reveal significant performance gains for disclosing hotels, driven primarily by firm-operated measures, whereas consumer-involved initiatives yield neutral or adverse effects. Pandemic severity, government responses, and hotel status further moderate efficacy. Additionally, mediation analysis reveals that performance improvements are partially attributable to the increase in positive consumer feedback. Our findings contribute to the crisis management and tourism literature and offer managerial insights for enhancing operational performance in the hospitality industry.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
