Gender stereotypes may affect market transactions. We use a laboratory experimental fifth-price Vickrey auction to analyze the effect of the producer’s gender on consumers’ willingness to pay (WTP) for wine, along with a response to the perceived warmth and competence of the producer. The within-subject design includes three rounds for one male and one female producer. Round 1 includes their name and picture, round 2 adds their professional background, and round 3 includes a tasting. Using two models, we regress WTP against the producer’s gender and then against its interaction with perceived warmth and competence. Our main results suggest that while consumers’ WTP is not sensitive to the gender of the producer, perceived warmth and competence correlate differently with WTP for each producer, with a stronger influence of competence for the female and a stronger effect of warmth for the male.
AakerJLGarbinskyENVohsKD (2012) Cultivating admiration in brands: warmth, competence, and landing in the “golden quadrant”. Journal of Consumer Psychology22(2): 191–194.
2.
AckermannTZimmerC (2021) The sound of gender–correlations of name phonology and gender across languages. Linguistics59(4): 1143–1177.
BryantLGarnhamB (2014) The embodiment of women in wine: gender inequality and gendered inscriptions of the working body in a corporate wine organization. Gender, Work and Organization21(5): 411–426.
5.
CaiRDengDSChiCG, et al. (2024) The eyes have it: how do gender cues in wine labels influence US women wine consumers?International Journal of Hospitality Management123: 103930.
6.
Campos-SoriaJAOrtega-AguazaBRopero-GarciaMA (2009) Gender segregation and wage difference in the hospitality industry. Tourism Economics15(4): 847–866.
7.
CassidyKWKellyMHSLJ (1999) Inferring gender from name phonology. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General128(3): 362–381.
8.
Castillo-OrtizILeeMTaylorS, et al. (2024) Forecasting the Mexican craft beer market: an integrated consumer perception conjoint analysis approach incorporating price and product attributes. International Journal of Wine Business Research36(2): 248–269.
9.
CharnessGGneezyUKuhnMA (2012) Experimental methods: between-subject and within-subject design. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization81(1): 1–8.
10.
ColleyANorthAHargreavesDJ (2003) Gender bias in the evaluation of New Age music. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology44(2): 125–131.
11.
CollinsJC (2015) Characteristics of “masculinized” industries: Gay men as a provocative exception to male privilege and gendered rules. Human Resource Development Review14(4): 415–441.
12.
CooperDJ (2014) A note on deception in economic experiments. Journal of Wine Economics9(2): 111–114.
13.
CorriganJRRousuMC (2006) The effect of initial endowments in experimental auctions. American Journal of Agricultural Economics88(2): 448–457.
14.
CowartKOFoxGLWilsonAE (2008) A structural look at consumer innovativeness and self‐congruence in new product purchases. Psychology and Marketing25(12): 1111–1130.
15.
CroppenstedtAGoldsteinMRosasN (2013) Gender and agriculture: inefficiencies, segregation, and low productivity traps. The World Bank Research Observer28(1): 79–109.
16.
CuddyAJGlickPBeningerA (2011) The dynamics of warmth and competence judgments, and their outcomes in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior31: 73–98.
17.
DenissenAM (2010) The right tools for the job: constructing gender meanings and identities in the male-dominated building trades. Human Relations63(7): 1051–1069.
18.
DolanCSorbyK (2003) Gender and employment in high-value agriculture industries. Agriculture and rural development working paper7(90): 149–157.
19.
DrichoutisACLazaridisPNaygaRMJr (2008) The role of reference prices in experimental auctions. Economics Letters99(3): 446–448.
20.
EaglyAHKiteME (1987) Are stereotypes of nationalities applied to both women and men?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology53(3): 451–462.
21.
EaglyAHWoodW (1991) Explaining sex differences in social behavior: a meta-analytic perspective. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin17(3): 306–315.
22.
FerreiraCLourenço-GomesLPintoLMC (2022) How does self-reported knowledge influence the effect of extrinsic cues on wine choice? A qualitative approach. Journal of Wine Research33(1): 17–39.
23.
FischerEGainerBBristorJ (1997) The sex of the service provider: does it influence perceptions of service quality?Journal of Retailing73(3): 361–382.
24.
FiskeSTCuddyAJGlickP, et al. (2002) A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology82(6): 878–902.
25.
FiskeSTCuddyAJGlickP, et al. (2018) A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. In: Social Cognition. Oxfordshire, UK: Routledge, 162–214.
26.
FugateDLPhillipsJ (2010) Product gender perceptions and antecedents of product gender congruence. Journal of Consumer Marketing27(3): 251–261.
27.
GallaisALivatF (2024) Willingness to pay for female-made wine: evidence from an online experiment. Journal of Wine Economics19(1): 41–63.
28.
GilbertLAGilbertJC (2012) Evidence of women winemakers’ success in a maledominated field. In: Meeting of the Association for Psychological Science, Chicago, IL, 24–27 May 2012, 24–27.
29.
GraciaALoureiroMLNaygaJ, et al. (2011) Valuing an EU animal welfare label using experimental auctions. Agricultural Economics42(6): 669–677.
30.
GüntürkünPHaumannTMikolonS (2020) Disentangling the differential roles of warmth and competence judgments in customer-service provider relationships. Journal of Service Research23(4): 476–503.
31.
GygaxPThomasCDidierjeanA, et al. (2019) Are women perceived as worse magicians than men? Gender bias when evaluating magic tricks. Social Psychological Bulletin14(3): 1–19.
32.
HessACMelnykV (2016) Pink or blue? The impact of gender cues on brand perceptions. European Journal of Marketing50(9/10): 1550–1574.
33.
InselBHoepfnerA (2018) Study: leadership in the wine industry and the role of women. WineBusiness Monthly.
34.
JuddCMJames-HawkinsLYzerbytV, et al. (2005) Fundamental dimensions of social judgment: understanding the relations between judgments of competence and warmth. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology89(6): 899–913.
35.
KapelnerAWeinbergD (2019) Do readers judge books by author gender? Results from a randomized experiment. Socius: Sociological Research for a Dynamic World5: 1–9. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/2378023119868893
36.
Knobloch-WesterwickSGlynnCJHugeM (2013) The Matilda effect in science communication: an experiment on gender bias in publication quality perceptions and collaboration interest. Science Communication35(5): 603–625.
37.
Kricheli-KatzTRegevT (2016) How many cents on the dollar? Women and men in product markets. Science Advances2(2): e1500599.
38.
LiXChanKWKimS (2019) Service with emoticons: how customers interpret employee use of emoticons in online service encounters. Journal of Consumer Research45(5): 973–987.
39.
LievenTGrohmannBHerrmannA, et al. (2015) The effect of brand design on brand gender perceptions and brand preference. European Journal of Marketing49(1/2): 146–169.
40.
LivatFJaffréC (2022) Women in wine… occasionally: gendered roles in the wine industry. In: The Routledge Handbook of Wine and Culture. Oxfordshire, UK: Routledge, 320–330.
41.
LockshinLJarvisWd’HautevilleF, et al. (2006) Using simulations from discrete choice experiments to measure consumer sensitivity to brand, region, price, and awards in wine choice. Food Quality and Preference17(3-4): 166–178.
42.
LuohH-FTsaurS-H (2007) Gender stereotypes and service quality in customer–waitperson encounters. Total Quality Management and Business Excellence18(9): 1035–1054.
LuskJLFeldkampTSchroederTC (2004) Experimental auction procedure: impact on valuation of quality differentiated goods. American Journal of Agricultural Economics86(2): 389–405.
45.
MassetPRaubS (2023) The impact of wine tasters’ expectations on wine quality ratings and willingness-to-pay. Journal of Wine Economics18(2): 156–172.
46.
MassetPTerrierLLivatF (2023) Can a wine be feminine? Gendered wine descriptors and quality, price and aging potential. Journal of Wine Economics18(4): 273–285, forthcoming.
47.
MatasarAB (2006) Women of Wine: The Rise of Women in the Global Wine Industry. Berkeley, CA: University of CA Press.
48.
NealeLRobbieRMartinB (2016) Gender identity and brand incongruence: when in doubt, pursue masculinity. Journal of Strategic Marketing24(5): 347–359.
49.
PetersenTSaportaI (2004) The opportunity structure for discrimination. American Journal of Sociology109(4): 852–901.
50.
PogacarRAngleJLowreyTM, et al. (2021) Is Nestlé a lady? The feminine brand name advantage. Journal of Marketing85(6): 101–117.
51.
PoriaY (2008) Gender—a crucial neglected element in the service encounter: an exploratory study of the choice of hotel masseur or masseuse. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Research32(2): 151–168.
52.
ProudfootDKayACKovalCZ (2015) A gender bias in the attribution of creativity: archival and experimental evidence for the perceived association between masculinity and creative thinking. Psychological Science26(11): 1751–1761.
53.
PuchałaDHansenK (2024) The role of language, appearance, and voice in the social perception of nonbinary individuals. Psychology of Sexual Orientation and Gender Diversity Advance Online Publication1–17. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1037/sgd0000709
54.
RoosenJMaretteS (2011) Making the ‘right’choice based on experiments: regulatory decisions for food and health. European Review of Agricultural Economics38(3): 361–381.
55.
SeoS (2022) When female (male) robot is talking to me: effect of service robots’ gender and anthropomorphism on customer satisfaction. International Journal of Hospitality Management102: 103166.
56.
SkalpeO (2007) The CEO gender pay gap in the tourism industry—evidence from Norway. Tourism Management28(3): 845–853.
57.
SmithNAMartinezLRSabatIE (2016) Weight and gender in service jobs: the importance of warmth in predicting customer satisfaction. Cornell Hospitality Quarterly57(3): 314–328.
58.
TajfelHTurnerJC (2004) The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In: Political Psychology. London, UK: Psychology Press, 276–293.
59.
TakECorrellSJSouleSA (2019) Gender inequality in product markets: when and how status beliefs transfer to products. Social Forces98(2): 548–577.
60.
Van DoorenWJilkeS (2024) No evidence for ethnic discrimination in the nonprofit sector: an audit study of access to nursing homes. International Public Management Journal27(1): 2–17.
61.
WeinbergDBKapelnerA (2018) Comparing gender discrimination and inequality in indie and traditional publishing. PLoS One13(4): e0195298.
62.
WeinbergDBKapelnerA (2022) Do book consumers discriminate against Black, female, or young authors?PLoS One17(6): e0267537.
63.
WeissEMMaurerTJ (2004) Age discrimination in personnel decisions: a reexamination. Journal of Applied Social Psychology34(8): 1551–1562.
64.
WetzelsC (2008) Are workers in the cultural industries paid differently? Wage differentials between three sub-industries of the cultural industries and their respective main industry: the case of The Netherlands. Journal of Cultural Economics32(1): 59–77.
65.
WojciszkeB (2005) Morality and competence in person-and self-perception. European Review of Social Psychology16(1): 155–188.
66.
WrightT (2016) Women's experience of workplace interactions in male‐dominated work: the intersections of gender, sexuality and occupational group. Gender, Work and Organization23(3): 348–362.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
