The nexus between tourism and income inequality has received much attention but no consensus emerged. It is of interest to explore how this nexus is affected by the important external condition of the Internet. This study examines the spatial threshold effect of the Internet on the nexus between tourism and urban-rural income inequality by developing a spatial threshold model. Using panel data for 280 Chinese cities from 2003 to 2019, the results show that the impact of the Internet is characterised by clear spatial thresholds, and the local and spatial spillover effects of tourism on urban-rural income inequality vary under different regimes of Internet development. Further, by differentiating the Internet’s functions, the inequality-reducing effect of tourism in local and surrounding cities has strengthened significantly as cities’ Internet penetration improves; meanwhile, this effect has increased first and then decreased as cities’ online market penetration deepens, with a relative optimal interval.
AlamMSParamatiSR (2016) The impact of tourism on income inequality in developing economies: does Kuznets curve hypothesis exist?Annals of Tourism Research61: 111–126.
2.
BauerJM (2018) The Internet and income inequality: socio-economic challenges in a hyperconnected society. Telecommunications Policy42(4): 333–343.
3.
BlakeA (2008) Tourism and income distribution in east africa. International Journal of Tourism Research10(6): 511–524.
4.
BraesemannFLehdonvirtaVKässiO (2022) ICTs and the urban-rural divide: can online labour platforms bridge the gap?Information, Communication and Society25(1): 34–54.
5.
BrousseauECurienN (2007) Internet and Digital Economics: Principles, Methods and Applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
6.
BrynjolfssonEHittLM (2000) Beyond computation: information technology, organizational transformation and business performance. The Journal of Economic Perspectives14(4): 23–48.
7.
CardonaMKretschmerTStrobelT (2013) ICT and productivity: conclusions from the empirical literature. Information Economics and Policy25(3): 109–125.
8.
ChenJPuMHouW (2019) The trend of the Gini coefficient of China (1978–2010). Journal of Chinese Economic and Business Studies17(3): 261–285.
9.
CroesRRiveraMA (2017) Tourism’s potential to benefit the poor: a social accounting matrix model applied to Ecuador. Tourism Economics23(1): 29–48.
10.
ElhorstJP (2014) Spatial Econometrics: From Cross-Sectional Data to Spatial Panels. Heidelberg: Springer.
11.
FanJTangLZhuW, et al. (2018) The Alibaba effect: spatial consumption inequality and the welfare gains from e-commerce. Journal of International Economics114: 203–220.
12.
FangZRazzaqAMohsinM, et al. (2022) Spatial spillovers and threshold effects of internet development and entrepreneurship on green innovation efficiency in China. Technology in Society68: 101844.
13.
FengYLiuYYuanH (2022) The spatial threshold effect and its regional boundary of new-type urbanization on energy efficiency. Energy Policy164: 112866.
14.
FormanCGoldfarbAGreensteinS (2005) How did location affect adoption of the commercial Internet? Global village vs. urban leadership. Journal of Urban Economics58(3): 389–420.
15.
GaoYZangLSunJ (2018) Does computer penetration increase farmers’ income? An empirical study from China. Telecommunications Policy42(5): 345–360.
16.
GuoQTDongYFengB, et al. (2023) Can green finance development promote total-factor energy efficiency? Empirical evidence from China based on a spatial Durbin model. Energy Policy177: 113523.
17.
HanCPhillipsPC (2010) GMM estimation for dynamic panels with fixed effects and strong instruments at unity. Econometric Theory26(1): 119–151.
18.
HansenBE (1999) Threshold effects in non-dynamic panels: estimation, testing, and inference. Journal of Econometrics93(2): 345–368.
19.
IvusOBolandM (2015) The employment and wage impact of broadband deployment in Canada. Canadian Journal of Economics48(5): 1803–1830.
20.
KaranasiosSBurgessS (2008) Tourism and internet adoption: a developing world perspective. International Journal of Tourism Research10(2): 169–182.
21.
KimJHKangKH (2020) The interaction effect of tourism and foreign direct investment on urban–rural income disparity in China: a comparison between autonomous regions and other provinces. Current Issues in Tourism23(1): 68–81.
22.
KlytchnikovaIDoroshP (2013) Tourism sector in Panama: regional economic impacts and the potential to benefit the poor. Natural Resources Forum37(2): 70–79.
23.
KumarNKumarRR (2020) Relationship between ICT and international tourism demand: a study of major tourist destinations. Tourism Economics26(6): 908–925.
24.
LawRLeungDChanICC (2020) Progression and development of information and communication technology research in hospitality and tourism: a state-of-the-art review. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management32(2): 511–534.
25.
LiR (2016) Spatial econometric research on the relationship between tourism development and urban-rural income gap in China. Economic Management38(9): 161–172.
26.
LiBHuangS (2021) Online market penetration and firm market power: micro evidence from Chinese manufacturing firms. Economic Research Journal56(11): 84–99.
27.
LiHChenJLLiG, et al. (2016) Tourism and regional income inequality: evidence from China. Annals of Tourism Research58: 81–99.
28.
LiLZengYYeZ, et al. (2021) E‐commerce development and urban‐rural income gap: evidence from Zhejiang Province, China. Papers in Regional Science100(2): 475–494.
29.
LiFChenJChenH, et al. (2022) How to reduce PM2. 5? Perspective from a spatial autoregressive threshold panel model. Ecological Indicators143: 109353.
30.
LiuJNijkampPLinD (2017) Urban-rural imbalance and tourism-led growth in China. Annals of Tourism Research64: 24–36.
31.
LvZ (2019) Deepening or lessening? The effects of tourism on regional inequality. Tourism Management72: 23–26.
32.
MahadevanRSuardiS (2019) Panel evidence on the impact of tourism growth on poverty, poverty gap and income inequality. Current Issues in Tourism22(3): 253–264.
33.
MarrocuEPaciR (2011) They arrive with new information. tourism flows and production efficiency in the European regions. Tourism Management32(4): 750–758.
34.
PangSLLiuHHuaGH (2024) How does digital finance drive the green economic growth? New discoveries of spatial threshold effect and attenuation possibility boundary. International Review of Economics and Finance89: 561–581.
35.
PaunovCRolloV (2016) Has the internet fostered inclusive innovation in the developing world?World Development78: 587–609.
36.
PenaAIPJamilenaDMF (2010) The relationship between business characteristics and ICT deployment in the rural tourism sector. The case of Spain. International Journal of Tourism Research12(1): 34–48.
37.
PenaAIPJamilenaDMFMarM (2013) Impact of customer orientation and ICT use on the perceived performance of rural tourism enterprises. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing30(3): 272–289.
38.
PengZDanT (2023) Digital dividend or digital divide? Digital economy and urban-rural income inequality in China. Telecommunications Policy47(9): 102616.
39.
PriegerJE (2013) The broadband digital divide and the economic benefits of mobile broadband for rural areas. Telecommunications Policy37(6-7): 483–502.
40.
QiuLZhongSSunB (2021) Blessing or curse? The effect of broadband Internet on China’s inter-city income inequality. Economic Analysis and Policy72: 626–650.
41.
RuanWZhangS (2021) Can tourism information flow enhance regional tourism economic linkages?Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management49: 614–623.
42.
ShawK (2002) By what means does information technology affect employment and wages? In: GreenanNHortyYL’MairesseJ (eds) Productivity, Inequality, and the Digital Economy: A Transatlantic Perspective. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
43.
ShiWLuoMJinM, et al. (2020) Urban–rural income disparity and inbound tourism: spatial evidence from China. Tourism Economics26(7): 1231–1247.
44.
StandingCTang-TayeJPBoyerM (2014) The impact of the internet in travel and tourism: a research review 2001–2010. Journal of Travel and Tourism Marketing31(1): 82–113.
45.
TangJGongJMaW (2022) Narrowing urban–rural income gap in China: the role of the targeted poverty alleviation program. Economic Analysis and Policy75: 74–90.
46.
UzarUEyubogluK (2019) Can tourism be a key sector in reducing income inequality? An empirical investigation for Turkey. Asia Pacific Journal of Tourism Research24(8): 822–838.
47.
WangKLSunTTXuRY, et al. (2022) How does internet development promote urban green innovation efficiency? Evidence from China. Technological Forecasting and Social Change184: 122017.
48.
WangPCenCLinX (2023) Internet development and the spatial optimization of regional productivity: evidence from China. Growth and Change54: 912–939.
49.
WuHHaoYRenS, et al. (2021a) Does internet development improve green total factor energy efficiency? Evidence from China. Energy Policy153: 112247.
50.
WuHXueYHaoY, et al. (2021b) How does internet development affect energy-saving and emission reduction? Evidence from China. Energy Economics103: 105577.
51.
XiangZWangDO’LearyJT, et al. (2015) Adapting to the internet: trends in travelers’ use of the web for trip planning. Journal of Travel Research54(4): 511–527.
52.
XueLShenCLinC (2023) Effects of internet technology on the innovation performance of small-scale travel agencies: organizational learning innovation and competitive advantage as mediators. Journal of the Knowledge Economy14: 1830–1855.
53.
YanBWangFDongM, et al. (2022) How do financial spatial structure and economic agglomeration affect carbon emission intensity? Theory extension and evidence from China. Economic Modelling108: 105745.
54.
YangY (2020) Does Internet improve quality and efficiency of China tourism industry? Empirical test based on Chinese provincial data from 2004 to 2014. Tourism Tribune35(1): 32–46.
55.
YangYFikT (2014) Spatial effects in regional tourism growth. Annals of Tourism Research46: 144–162.
56.
YangYWongKKF (2012) A spatial econometric approach to model spillover effects in tourism flows. Journal of Travel Research51(6): 768–778.
57.
YinZHChoiCH (2022) Does e-commerce narrow the urban–rural income gap? Evidence from Chinese provinces. Internet Research32(4): 1427–1452.
58.
YuanHFengYLeeJ, et al. (2020) The spatial threshold effect and its regional boundary of financial agglomeration on green development: a case study in China. Journal of Cleaner Production244: 118670.
59.
ZengZWangX (2021a) Effects of domestic tourism on urban-rural income inequality: evidence from China. Sustainability13(16): 9009.
60.
ZengZWangX (2021b) Spatial effects of domestic tourism on urban-rural income inequality. Sustainability13(16): 9394.
61.
ZhangJ (2021) The effects of tourism on income inequality: a meta-analysis of econometrics studies. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management48: 312–321.
62.
ZhangJ (2023a) Tourism and rural income inequality: empirical evidence for China. Current Issues in Tourism26(1): 153–170.
63.
ZhangJ (2023b) The nonlinear effects of tourism on rural income inequality and urban–rural income inequality: evidence from China. Tourism Economics29(1): 172–193.
64.
ZhangMZhangGLiuH (2021) Analysis of the impact of tourism development on the urban-rural income gap: evidence from 248 prefecture-level cities in China. Asia Pacific Journal of Tourism Research26(6): 614–625.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
