This study aims to develop a benefit valuation model with household production under consumption suppressed by self-restraint, as observed during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. This study proposes a model to measure the benefits of the value of time (VOT), value of environmental quality (VOQ), and value of self-restrained consumption (VOS). Numerical simulations show that 1) the benefits can be measured in a single modeling system, 2) the absolute VOS might be larger than the other benefits, 3) the VOS decreases exponentially with an increase in self-restrained consumption, and 4) the VOT may be sensitive to the degrees of the parameter values.
BigirwaDMseseLRRwakalazaR, et al. (2021) Measuring the economic use values of recreation resources in protected areas, evidence from Nyerere national park in Tanzania. American Journal of Environmental and Resource Economics6(2): 54–65. DOI: 10.11648/j.ajere.20210602.14.
2.
CaulkinsPPBishopRCBouwesNWSr (1986) The travel cost model for lake recreation: a comparison of two methods for incorporating site quality and substitution effects. American Journal of Agricultural Economics68(2): 291–297. DOI: 10.2307/1241430.
3.
De SerpaAC (1971) A theory of the economics of time. The Economic Journal81(324): 828–846. DOI: 10.2307/2230320.
4.
EberleWDHaydenFG (1991) Critique of contingent valuation and travel cost methods for valuing natural resources and ecosystems. Journal of Economic Issues25(3): 649–687. DOI: 10.1080/00213624.1991.11505196.
5.
EbertU (2007) Revealed preference and household production. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management53: 276–289. DOI: 10.1016/j.jeem.2006.09.003.
6.
EomYSLarsonDM (2006) Improving environmental valuation estimates through consistent use of revealed and stated preference information. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management52(1): 501–516. DOI: 10.1016/j.jeem.2005.11.001.
7.
HausmanJA (1981) Exact consumer’s surplus and deadweight loss. American Economic Review71(4): 662–676. Available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1806188 (Accessed 5 December 2021).
8.
HayashiyamaYNoharaK (2008) Time spent on the recreation site and recreation benefits: evaluation on theory by revealed preference approach (in Japanese). Environmental systems research36: 327–332.
9.
HardyABeetonRJSPearsonL (2002) Sustainable tourism: an overview of the concept and its position in relation to conceptualisations of tourism. Journal of Sustainable Tourism10(6): 475–496. DOI: 10.1080/09669580208667183.
10.
HaryantoT (2020) COVID-19 pandemic and international tourism demand. Journal of Developing Economies5(1): 1–4. DOI: 10.20473/jde.v5i1.19767.
11.
KealyMJBishopRC (1986) Theoretical and empirical specification issues and travel cost demand studies. American Journal of Agricultural Economics68(3): 660–667. DOI: 10.2307/1241550.
12.
KlingCLHerrigesJ (2008) Revealed Preference Approaches to Environmental Valuation Vol. I and II. London: Routledge.
13.
KimSSWongKKFChoM (2007) Assessing the economic value of a world heritage site and willingness-to-pay determinants: a case of Changdeok Palace. Tourism Management28(1): 317–322. DOI: 10.1016/j.tourman.2005.12.024.
14.
KrutillaJV (1967) Consideration reconsidered. American Economic Review57(4): 777–786.
15.
LarsonDShaikhS (2004) Recreation demand choice and revealed values of leisure time. Economic Inquiry42(2): 264–278. DOI: 10.1093/ei/cbh059.
16.
MalteseIMariottiIOppioA, et al. (2017) Assessing the benefits of slow mobility connecting a cultural heritage. Journal of Cultural Heritage26: 153–159. DOI: 10.1016/j.culher.2017.01.006.
17.
MazumdeR (2012) Application of travel cost method to assess the pricing policy of public parks: the case of Kaziranga National Park. Journal of Regional Development and Planning1(1): 44–52.
18.
MitchellRCCarsonRT (1989) Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: The Contingent Valuation Method. New York: RFF Press.
19.
NuraeniSArruAPNovaniS (2015) Understanding consumer decision-making in tourism sector: conjoint analysis. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences169: 312–317. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.315.
20.
PhaneufDJSiderelisC (2003) An application of the Kuhn–Tucker model to the demand for water trail trips in North Carolina. Marine Resource Economics18(1): 1–14. Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/42629380 (Accessed 20 Feburary 2022).
21.
PoorPJSmithJM (2004) Travel cost analysis of a cultural heritage site: the case of historic St. Mary’s city of Maryland. Journal of Cultural Economics28: 217–229. DOI: 10.1023/B:JCEC.0000038020.51631.55.
22.
SuhYKMcAvoyL (2005) Preferences and trip expenditures—a conjoint analysis of visitors to Seoul, Korea. Tourism Management26(3): 325–333. DOI: 10.1016/j.tourman.2003.11.015.
23.
TaylorRGMcKeanJRJohnsonDM (2010) Measuring the location value of a recreation site. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics35(1): 87–104. DOI: 10.2307/23243038.
24.
TorreAScarboroughH (2017) Reconsidering the estimation of the economic impact of cultural tourism. Tourism Management59: 621–629. DOI: 10.1016/j.tourman.2016.09.018.
25.
VoltaireLLéviLAlbanF, et al. (2017) Valuing cultural world heritage sites: an application of the travel cost method to Mont-Saint-Michel. Applied Economics49(16): 1593–1605. DOI: 10.1080/00036846.2016.1221046.
26.
YamaguchiAKandaK (2020) To what extent was personal consumption suppressed by voluntary restraint due to COVID-19? In: Economic Report. Koto, Tokyo: Daiwa Institute of Research (In Japanese).
27.
ZhangaHSongHWenL, et al. (2021) Forecasting tourism recovery amid COVID-19. Annals of Tourism Research87: 103–149. DOI: 10.1016/j.annals.2021.103149.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
