This study provides new evidence on the impact of tourism grants for service-standard improvement on tourism firm performance. Small matching grants provided to firms in two economically different regions are considered. We study additionality caused by the grants in the performance indicators of firms while taking into account regional heterogeneity and differing tourism demand. In the context of tourism firms in Croatia, we estimate the causal effect via a matching difference-in-differences estimator. We find a positive effect on tourism firm sales, value-added, capital, and labor in the region with higher tourism demand but not in the one with lower tourism demand. A cost–benefit analysis suggests that, in more developed regions, the benefits of the grant scheme for tourism outweigh the grant’s direct costs.
AbadieAImbensGW (2008) On the failure of the bootstrap for matching estimators. Econometrica76(6): 1537–1557.
2.
AckerbergDACavesKFrazerG (2015) Identification properties of recent production function estimators. Econometrica83(6): 2411–2451.
3.
AnsolabehereSSnyderJMJr (2006) Party control of state government and the distribution of public expenditures. Scandinavian Journal of Economics108(4): 547–569.
4.
AssafAGTsionasMG (2019) A review of research into performance modeling in tourism research-launching the annals of tourism research curated collection on performance modeling in tourism research. Annals of Tourism Research76: 266–277.
5.
Bagur-FemeníasLPerramonJOliveras VillanuevaM (2019) Effects of service quality policies in the tourism sector performance: an empirical analysis of Spanish hotels and restaurant. Sustainability11: 872.
6.
BerniniC.PellegriniG (2013) Is subsidising tourism firms an effective use of public funds?Tourism Management35: 156–167.
7.
BlakeASinclairMTSoriaJAC (2006) Tourism productivity: evidence from the United Kingdom. Annals of Tourism Research33(4): 1099–1120.
8.
Chabé-FerretS (2017). Should We Combine Difference In Differences with Conditioning on Pre-Treatment Outcomes?(TSE Working Paper, No. 17–824). France: Toulouse. Available at: http://publications.ut-capitole.fr/25629/1/wp_tse_824.pdf (accessed 12 April 2020).
9.
CohenJ (1977) Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. London, UK: Academic Press.
10.
CriscuoloCMartinROvermanHG, et al. (2019) Some causal effects of an industrial policy. American Economic Review109(1): 48–85.
11.
DomadenikPKomanMPrašnikarJ (2018) Do governmental subsidies increase productivity of firms? Evidence from a panel of Slovene firms. Društvena istraživanja: časopis za opća društvena pitanja27(2): 199–220.
12.
DvouletýOSrhojSPanteaS (2020) Public SME grants and firm performance in European Union: a systematic review of empirical evidence. Small Business Economic: 1–21. DOI: 10.1007/s11187-019-00306-x.
13.
DwyerLForsythPSpurrR (2004). Evaluating tourism’s economic effects: new and old approaches. Tourism Management25: 307–317.
14.
DZS (2010-2017) Croatian Bureau of Statistics—First Releases Tourist Arrivals and Nights for Period 2010-2017. Croatia: Državni zavod za statistiku (DZS). Available at: https://www.dzs.hr/Hrv_Eng/publication/2017/04-03-02_01_2017.htm (accessed 10 April 2019).
FleischerAFelsensteinD (2004) Short-run output and employment effects arising from assistance to tourism SMEs: evidence from Israel. In: ThomasR (ed) Small Firms in Tourism: International Perspectives. UK: Elsevier Science, pp. 71–82.
18.
GrönroosC (1984) A service quality model and its marketing implications. European Journal of Marketing18(4): 36–44.
19.
HendrenNSprung-KeyserB (2020) A unified welfare analysis of government policies. The Quarterly Journal of Economics135(3): 1209–1318.
20.
HoDEImaiKKingG, et al. (2011) MatchIt: nonparametric preprocessing for parametric causal inference. Journal of Statistical Software42(8): 1–28.
21.
HottenrottHLopes-BentoCVeugelersR (2017) Direct and cross scheme effects in a research and development subsidy program. Research Policy46(6): 1118–1132.
22.
HurleyAArcherBFletcherJ (1994) The economic impact of European Community grants for tourism in the Republic of Ireland. Tourism Management15(3): 203–211.
23.
ImbensGWWooldridgeJM (2009) Recent developments in the econometrics of program evaluation. Journal of Economic Literature47(1): 5–86.
24.
KingGNielsenR (2019) Why propensity scores should not be used for matching. Political Analysis27(4): 435–454.
25.
LehtinenULehtinenJR (1991) Two approaches to service quality dimensions. Service Industries Journal11(3): 287–303.
26.
LevinsohnJPetrinA (2003) Estimating production functions using inputs to control for unobservables. The Review of Economic Studies70(2): 317–341.
27.
LiuAWuDC (2019) Tourism productivity and economic growth. Annals of Tourism Research76: 253–265.
28.
MangionMLCooperCCortés-JimenezI, et al. (2012) Measuring the effect of subsidization on tourism demand and destination competitiveness through the AIDS model: an evidence-based approach to tourism policymaking. Tourism Economics18(6): 1251–1272.
29.
McKenzieD (2017) Identifying and spurring high-growth entrepreneurship: experimental evidence from a business plan competition. American Economic Review107(8): 2278–2307.
OECD (2017) Financing approaches for tourism SMEs and entrepreneurs. OECD Tourism Papers, 2017/03. Paris: OECD Publishing. DOI: 10.1787/8d06572a-en
36.
OvermanHGPugaD (2010) Labour pooling as a source of agglomeration: An empirical investigation. In: GlaeserEL (ed.) Agglomeration Economics. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
37.
PanfilukE (2016) Analysis of the effectiveness in the disbursement of the European regional development fund for selected entities in the tourism economy. Ekonomia i Zarzadzanie8(4): 39–49.
38.
ParasuramanABerryLLZeithamlVA (1985) A conceptual model of service quality and its implications for future research. Journal of Marketing49(4): 41–50.
39.
ParkSNicolauJL (2019) Image effect on customer-centric measures of performance. Annals of Tourism Research76: 226–238.
40.
PerićMVitezicV (2016) Impact of global economic crisis on firm growth. Small Business Economics46(1): 1–12.
41.
RyanC (2018) Future trends in tourism research–looking back to look forward: the future of ‘Tourism Management Perspectives’. Tourism Management Perspectives25: 196–199.
42.
SalehFRyanC (1991) Analysing service quality in the hospitality industry using the SERVQUAL model. Service Industries Journal11(3): 324–345.
43.
SchubertS. F.BridaJ. G (2008) Dynamic effects of subsidizing the tourism sector. Tourism Economics14(1): 57–80.
44.
SkalpeOSandvikK (2002) The economics of quality in the hotel business. Tourism Economics8(4): 361–376.
45.
SongHvan der VeenRLiG, et al. (2012) The Hong Kong tourist satisfaction index. Annals of Tourism Research39(1): 459–479.
46.
SrhojSWaldeJ (2020) Getting ready for EU single market: the effect of export-oriented grant schemes on firm performance. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics52: 279–293.
47.
SrhojSLapinskiMWaldeJ (2020) Impact evaluation of business development grants on SME performance. Small Business Economics: 1–17. DOI: 10.1007/s11187-020-00348-6.
48.
SrhojSŠkrinjarićBRadasS (2021) Bidding against the odds? The impact evaluation of grants for young micro and small firms during the recession. Small Business Economics56(1): 83–103.
49.
TundisEGabrieleRZaninottoE (2017) Investigating the effectiveness of public subsidies to hotels: evidence from an Alpine region. Tourism management perspectives23: 8–18.
VitezićVCarTŠimunićM (2015) Managing innovative technology in the hotel industry-response to growing consumer preferences. International Scientific Conference Tourism in Southern and Eastern Europe3: 467–478.
52.
VitezićV.SrhojS.PerićM (2018) Investigating industry dynamics in a recessionary transition economy. South East European Journal of Economics and Business13(1): 43–67.
53.
Zúñiga-VicenteJÁAlonso-BorregoCForcadellFJGalánJI (2014) Assessing the effect of public subsidies on firm R&D investment: a survey. Journal of Economic Surveys28(1): 36–67.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
