This study assesses how and in what circumstances tourists’ perceived value of nature-based tourism (NBT) attributes differ among various types of national parks. A novel discrete choice experiment is used employing data collected from 343 international tourists in four national parks in Sri Lanka. We find that the improvements in frequency of large species’ encounters, habitat quality and proximity to encountered wildlife produce greater utility. A surprising finding is that tourists are shown to prefer to spend only a limited amount of time at national parks. They also tend to choose less-visited parks that have large mammals for which they would be willing to pay more compared to those national parks that are more frequently visited. Our article contributes to the empirical evidence that time is a key factor that determines the tourism destination choice and less-visited parks offer considerable potential for future growth of tourism.
AdamowiczWBoxallPWilliamsM, et al. (1998) Stated preference approaches for measuring passive use values: choice experiments and contingent valuation. American Journal of Agricultural Economics80(1): 64–75.
AusterREBarrSWBrazierRE (2020) Wildlife tourism in reintroduction projects: exploring social and economic benefits of beaver in local settings. Journal for Nature Conservation58: 125920.
4.
AylwardBAllenKEcheverríaJ, et al. (1996) Sustainable ecotourism in Costa Rica: the Monteverde Cloud Forest Reserve. Biodiversity and Conservation5: 315–343.
5.
BirolEKarousakisKKoundouriP (2006) Using a choice experiment to account for preference heterogeneity in wetland attributes: the case of Cheimaditida wetland in Greece. Ecological Economics60(1): 145–156.
6.
BoleyBBGreenGT (2016) Ecotourism and natural resource conservation: the ‘potential’ for a sustainable symbiotic relationship. Journal of Ecotourism15(1): 36–50.
7.
BoxallPCMacnabB (2000) Exploring the preferences of wildlife recreationists for features of boreal forest management: a choice experiment approach. Canadian Journal of Forest Research30(12): 1931–1941.
8.
BoxallPCWatsonDOEnglinJ (1996) Backcountry recreationists’ valuation of forest and park management features in wilderness parks of the western Canadian Shield. Canadian Journal of Forest Research26(6): 982–990.
9.
BuckleyR (2009) Parks and tourism. PLOS Biology7(6): e1000143.
10.
BudowskiG (1976) Tourism and environmental conservation: conflict, coexistence, or symbiosis. Environmental Conservation3(1): 27–31.
11.
BuultjensJRatnayakeIGnanapalaA, et al. (2005) Tourism and its implications for management in Ruhuna National Park (Yala), Sri Lanka. Tourism Management26(5): 733–742.
12.
CastroCBArmarioEMRuizDM (2007) The influence of market heterogeneity on the relationship between a destination’s image and tourists’ future behaviour. Tourism Management28(1): 175–187.
ChunJKimCKKimGS, et al. (2020) Social big data informs spatially explicit management options for national parks with high tourism pressures. Tourism Management81: 104136.
15.
CongLNewsomeDWuB, et al. (2017) Wildlife tourism in China: a review of the Chinese research literature. Current Issues in Tourism20(11): 1116–1139.
16.
Díaz-PérezFMBethencourt-CejasM (2016) CHAID algorithm as an appropriate analytical method for tourism market segmentation. Journal of Destination Marketing & Management5(3): 275–282.
17.
DwyerLKimC (2003) Destination competitiveness: determinants and indicators. Current Issues in Tourism6(5): 369–414.
18.
DybsandHNH (2020) In the absence of a main attraction – perspectives from polar bear watching tourism participants. Tourism Management79: 104097.
19.
EstifanosTPolyakovMPanditR, et al. (2019) What are tourists willing to pay for securing the survival of a flagship species? The case of protection of the Ethiopian wolf. Tourism Economics27(1): 45–69.
20.
HanleyNWrightREAdamowiczV (1998) Using choice experiments to value the environment. Environmental and Resource Economics11(3): 413–428.
21.
HausmannAToivonenTSlotowR, et al. (2018) Social media data can be used to understand tourists’ preferences for nature-based experiences in protected areas. Conservation Letters11(1): e12343.
22.
HensherDARoseJMGreeneWH (2015) Applied Choice Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–1071.
23.
HuangYDengJLiJ, et al. (2008) Visitors’ attitudes towards China’s national forest park policy, roles and functions, and appropriate use. Journal of Sustainable Tourism16(1): 63–84.
24.
HuybersTBennettJ (2003) Environmental management and the competitiveness of nature-based tourism destinations. Environmental and Resource Economics24(3): 213–233.
25.
JacobsenJBHanleyN (2009) Are there income effects on global willingness to pay for biodiversity conservation?Environmental and Resource Economics43(2): 137–160.
26.
KangNWangEYuY (2019) Valuing forest park attributes by giving consideration to the tourist satisfaction. Tourism Economics25(5): 711–733.
27.
KimSSLeeCKKlenoskyDB (2003) The influence of push and pull factors at Korean national parks. Tourism Management24(2): 169–180.
28.
KimYJLeeDKKimCK (2020) Spatial trade-off between biodiversity and nature-based tourism: considering mobile phone-driven visitation pattern. Global Ecology and Conservation21: e00899.
29.
KozakM (2002) Comparative analysis of tourist motivations by nationality and destinations. Tourism Management23(3): 221–232.
30.
KrügerO (2005) The role of ecotourism in conservation: Panacea or Pandora’s box?Biodiversity and Conservation14(3): 579–600.
31.
KularatneTWilsonCLeeB, et al. (2021) Tourists’ before and after experience valuations: a unique choice experiment with policy implications for the nature-based tourism industry. Economic Analysis and Policy69: 529–543.
32.
LaarmanJGGregersenHM (1996) Pricing policy in nature-based tourism. Tourism Management17(4): 247–254.
33.
LiZHensherDA (2020) Performance contributors of bus rapid transit systems: an ordered choice approach. Economic Analysis and Policy67: 154–161.
34.
LuoYDengJ (2008) The new environmental paradigm and nature-based tourism motivation. Journal of Travel Research46(4): 392–402.
35.
McFaddenDS (1974) Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior. In: ZarembkaP (ed), Frontiers in Econometrics. New York, NY: Academic Press.
36.
McKinnonEARotenbergJAStutchburyBJ (2015) Seasonal change in tropical habitat quality and body condition for a declining migratory songbird. Oecologia179(2): 363–375.
37.
MehmetogluM (2007) Typologising nature-based tourists by activity – theoretical and practical implications. Tourism Management28(3): 651–660.
38.
MeledduMPulinaM (2016) Evaluation of individuals’ intention to pay a premium price for ecotourism: an exploratory study. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics65: 67–78.
39.
MutangaCNVengesayiSChikutaO, et al. (2017) Travel motivation and tourist satisfaction with wildlife tourism experiences in Gonarezhou and Matusadona National Parks, Zimbabwe. Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism20: 1–18.
40.
NaidooRAdamowiczWL (2005) Biodiversity and nature-based tourism at forest reserves in Uganda. Environment and Development Economics10(2): 159–178.
41.
NguyenMHNguyenTLANguyenT, et al. (2021) Economic analysis of choices among differing measures to manage coastal erosion in Hoi An (a UNESCO World Heritage Site). Economic Analysis and Policy70: 529–543.
42.
OkelloMMMankaSGD’AmourDE (2008) The relative importance of large mammal species for tourism in Amboseli National Park, Kenya. Tourism Management29(4): 751–760.
43.
PizamASussmannS (1995) Does nationality affect tourist behavior?Annals of Tourism Research22(4): 901–917.
44.
PringleRM (2017) Upgrading protected areas to conserve wild biodiversity. Nature546(7656): 91–99.
45.
PriskinJ (2003) Characteristics and perceptions of coastal and wildflower nature-based tourists in the central coast region of Western Australia. Journal of Sustainable Tourism11(6): 499–528.
46.
ReynoldsPCBraithwaiteD (2001) Towards a conceptual framework for wildlife tourism. Tourism Management22(1): 31–42.
47.
RolfeJBennettJLouviereJ (2000) Choice modelling and its potential application to tropical rainforest preservation. Ecological Economics35(2): 289–302.
48.
RyanCHughesKChirgwinS (2000) The gaze, spectacle and ecotourism. Annals of Tourism Research27(1): 148–163.
49.
SaaymanMSaaymanA (2014) Who is willing to pay to see the Big 7. Tourism Economics20(6): 1181–1198.
50.
SeddighiHRTheocharousAL (2002) A model of tourism destination choice: a theoretical and empirical analysis. Tourism Management23(5): 475–487.
51.
SekerciogluCH (2002) Impacts of birdwatching on human and avian communities. Environmental Conservation29 (3): 282–289.
52.
SiikamäkiPKangasKPaasivaaraA, et al. (2015) Biodiversity attracts visitors to national parks. Biodiversity and Conservation24(10): 2521–2534.
53.
SkibinsJCHalloJCSharpJL, et al. (2012) Quantifying the role of viewing the Denali “big 5” in visitor satisfaction and awareness: conservation implications for flagship recognition and resource management. Human Dimensions of Wildlife17(2): 112–128.
54.
SmallmanCMooreK (2010) Process studies of tourists’ decision-making. Annals of Tourism Research37(2): 397–422.
55.
SmithSL (1994) The tourism product. Annals of Tourism Research21(3): 582–595.
56.
Sri Lanka Ministry of Environment (2012) The National red-list Sri Lanka – conservation status of fauna and flora, Biodiversity Secretariat, Ministry of Environment, Sri Lanka, Colombo, Sri Lanka. Available at: http://www.cea.lk/web/images/pdf/redlist2012.pdf(accessed 30 November 2020).
SureshKKhanalUWilsonC (2021) Stakeholders’ use and preservation valuation of lagoon ecosystems. Economic Analysis and Policy71: 123–137.
60.
SureshJSenthilnathanS (2014) Relationship between tourism and economic growth in Sri Lanka. In: VijayakumarS (ed), Published as the 7th chapter in “Economic Issues in Sri Lanka”. Chennai: Thurai Pathippagam, pp. 115–132.
61.
SureshKSivaguruTDarmalingamS, et al. (2020) The impact of Covid-19 on the Sri Lankan tourism sector and its future prospects. American Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences Research (AJHSSR)4(11): 146–153.
62.
TisdellC (2003) Economic aspects of ecotourism: wildlife-based tourism and its contribution to nature. Sri Lankan Journal of Agricultural Economics5(1): 83–95.
63.
TisdellCWilsonC (2001) Wildlife-based tourism and increased support for nature conservation financially and otherwise: Evidence from sea turtle ecotourism at Mon Repos. Tourism Economics7(3): 233–249.
64.
TisdellCAWilsonC (2012) Nature-Based Tourism and Conservation: New Economic Insights and Case Studies. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 1–520.
65.
UysalMJurowskiC (1994) Testing the push and pull factors. Annals of Tourism Research21(4): 844–846.
66.
ValentinePS (1993) Ecotourism and nature conservation: a definition with some recent developments in Micronesia. Tourism Management14(2): 107–115.
67.
VineyRLancsarELouviereJ (2002) Discrete choice experiments to measure consumer preferences for health and healthcare. Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research2(4): 319–326.
68.
WilsonCTisdellC (2001) Sea turtles as a non-consumptive tourism resource, especially in Australia. Tourism Management22(3): 279–288.
69.
WTTC (2013, 2017 & 2019) Travel and Tourism Competitiveness Report. London: World Travel and Tourism Council. London, United Kingdom.
70.
XuFFoxD (2014) Modelling attitudes to nature, tourism and sustainable development in national parks: a survey of visitors in China and the UK. Tourism Management45: 142–158.
71.
YaoRTScarpaRTurnerJA, et al. (2014) Valuing biodiversity enhancement in New Zealand’s planted forests: socioeconomic and spatial determinants of willingness-to-pay. Ecological Economics98: 90–101.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
