Ecotourism can be an important tool for protecting biodiversity in developing countries. Tourists have preferences for viewing charismatic species and for their conservation, but our understanding of these preferences remains limited. Using choice experiment surveys, we investigate tourists’ preferences and willingness to pay (WTP) for the protection of the Ethiopian wolf (Canis simensis) in Ethiopia’s Bale Mountains National Park. Results from a random parameter logit model show that tourists were willing to pay up to US$5.82/day/trip for increasing the wolf population from 200 to a more viable number of 250 but very little for a more substantial increase. Tourists also valued increases in the size of the protected area (PA) and access to the wolf habitat. The WTP is found to be dependent on tourists’ prior experience to Ethiopian PAs and whether they had viewed other unique species in the park. The findings suggest opportunities for ecotourism to support the Ethiopian wolf, which is in a critical state, and that the primary motivation for tourists’ support might be due to the wolf’s existence value.
AdamowiczWBoxallPWilliamsM, et al. (1998) Stated preference approaches for measuring passive use values: choice experiments and contingent valuation. American Journal of Agricultural Economics80: 64–75.
2.
ArbieuUGrünewaldCMartín-LópezB, et al. (2018) Large mammal diversity matters for wildlife tourism in Southern African protected areas: insights for management. Ecosystem Services31: 481–490.
3.
BalmfordABeresfordJGreenJ, et al. (2009) A global perspective on trends in nature-based tourism. PLoS Biology7: 1–6.
4.
BalmfordAGreenJMHAndersonM, et al. (2015) Walk on the wild side: estimating the global magnitude of visits to protected areas. PLoS Biology13: 1–6.
5.
BartczakAMarielPChiltonS, et al. (2015) The impact of latent risk preferences on valuing the preservation of threatened lynx populations in Poland. Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics60: 284–306.
6.
BatemanIJCarsonRTDayB, et al. (2002) Economic Valuation with Stated Preference Techniques: A Manual. Cheltenham:Edward Elgar.
7.
BennettJBlameyR (2001) The choice modelling approach to environmental valuation. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
8.
BirdLife International (2012) Ecosystem Profile: Eastern Afromontane Biodiversity Hotspot Critical Ecosystem Partnership Fund (CEPF). Arlington: Conservation International.
9.
BomanMBostedtG (1999) Valuing the wolf in Sweden: are benefits contingent on the supply? In: BomanMBrdnnlundRKristromB (eds) Topics in Environmental Economics. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic, pp. 157–174.
10.
BoxallPCAdamowiczWL (2002) Understanding heterogeneous preferences in random utility models: a latent class approach. Environmental and Resource Economics23: 421–446.
11.
BrunerAGGullisonREBalmfordA (2004) Financial costs and shortfalls of managing and expanding protected-area systems in developing countries. BioScience54: 1119–1126.
12.
BuckleyRC (2009) Parks and tourism. PLoS Biology7: 1–2.
13.
BuckleyRC (2013) To use tourism as a conservation tool, first study tourists. Animal Conservation16: 259–260.
14.
BuckleyRCCastleyJGPegasFDV, et al. (2012) A population accounting approach to assess tourism contributions to conservation of IUCN-redlisted mammal species. Plos One7: 1–8.
15.
ChambersCMWhiteheadJC (2003) A contingent valuation estimate of the benefits of wolves in Minnesota. Environmental and Resource Economics26: 249–267.
16.
ClucasBMcHughKCaroT (2008) Flagship species on covers of US conservation and nature magazines. Biodiversity and Conservation17: 1517–1528.
17.
Conservation Capital (2015) Bale Mountains National Park Tourism Development Plan February 2015. Ethiopian Wildlife Conservation Authority: Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
18.
Di MininEFraserISlotowR, et al. (2013a) Conservation marketing and education for less charismatic biodiversity and conservation businesses for sustainable development. Animal Conservation16: 263–264.
19.
Di MininEFraserISlotowR, et al. (2013b) Understanding heterogeneous preference of tourists for big game species: implications for conservation and management. Animal Conservation16: 249–258.
EricssonGBostedtGKindbergJ (2008) Wolves as a symbol of people’s willingness to pay for large carnivore conservation. Society & Natural Resources21: 294–309.
22.
GoodwinHJLeader-WilliamsN (2000) Protected area tourism – distorting conservation priorities towards charismatic megafauna? In: EntwistleADunstoneN (eds) Priorities for the Conservation of Mammalian Diversity: Has the Panda Had its Day?Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 257–275.
23.
GösslingS (1999) Ecotourism: a means to safeguard biodiversity and ecosystem functions?Ecological Economics29: 303–320.
24.
GottelliDSillero-ZubiriC (1992) The Ethiopian wolf – an endangered endemic canid. Oryx26: 205–214.
25.
GottelliDSillero-ZubiriCApplebaumGD, et al. (1994) Molecular genetics of the most endangered canid: the Ethiopian wolf Canis simensis. Molecular Ecology3: 301–312.
26.
GreeneWHHensherDARoseJ (2006) Accounting for heterogeneity in the variance of unobserved effects in mixed logit models. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological40: 75–92.
27.
HanleyNMouratoSWrightRE (2001) Choice modelling approaches: a superior alternative for environmental valuation?Journal of Economic Surveys15: 435–462.
28.
HausmannASlotowRFraserI, et al. (2017) Ecotourism marketing alternative to charismatic megafauna can also support biodiversity conservation. Animal Conservation20: 91–100.
29.
HeberleinTAWilsonMABishopRC, et al. (2005) Rethinking the scope test as a criterion for validity in contingent valuation. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management50: 1–22.
30.
HensherDARoseJMGreeneWH (2005a) Applied Choice Analysis: A Primer. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.
31.
HensherDAShoreNTrainK (2005b) Households’ willingness to pay for water service attributes. Environmental and Resource Economics32: 509–531.
32.
HillmanJC (1986) Conservation in Bale Mountains National Park, Ethiopia. Oryx20: 89–94.
33.
HillmanJC (1988) The Bale Mountains National Park area, Southeast Ethiopia, and its management. Mountain Research and Development8: 253–258.
34.
IUCN/SSC Canid Specialist Group (2011) Strategic plan for Ethiopian wolf conservation. Oxford: IUCN/SSC Canid Specialist Group.
35.
JacobsenJBLundhedeTHThorsenBJ (2012) Valuation of wildlife populations above survival. Biodiversity and Conservation21: 543–563.
36.
JorgensenBSWilsonMAHeberleinTA (2001) Fairness in the contingent valuation of environmental public goods: attitude toward paying for environmental improvements at two levels of scope. Ecological Economics36: 133–148.
37.
KinahanA (2011) Bale Mountains National Park Business and Sustainable Finance Plan 2011-2016. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: FZS/BMNP publication, pp. 1–30.
38.
KuhfeldWF (2004) Marketing Research Methods in SAS: Experimental Design, Choice, Conjoint, and Graphical Techniques. Cary: SAS Inc. Institute.
39.
LindseyPAAlexanderRMillsMGL, et al. (2007) Wildlife viewing preferences of visitors to protected areas in South Africa: implications for the role of ecotourism in conservation. Journal of Ecotourism6: 19–33.
40.
LouviereJJSwaitJHensherDA (2000) Stated Choice Methods: Analysis and Application. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.
41.
McFaddenD (1974) Conditional Logit Analysis of Qualitative Choice Behavior. New York: Academic Press.
42.
MarinoJSillero-ZubiriC (2013) Canis simensis. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2013. Available at: www.iucnredlist.org (accessed 5 October 2017).
43.
MarinoJStewartAEGordonCH, et al. (2011) Ethiopian wolf status review. In: Strategic planning for Ethiopian wolf conservation. IUCN/SSC Canid Specialist Group (eds), Oxford, United Kingdom, pp. 1–50.
44.
MoCT (2015) The Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia Sustainable Tourism Master Plan (2015–2025). Addis Ababa: Ministry of Culture and Tourism.
45.
Morse-JonesSBatemanIJKontoleonA, et al. (2012) Stated preferences for tropical wildlife conservation amongst distant beneficiaries: charisma, endemism, scope and substitution effects. Ecological Economics78: 9–18.
46.
MuellerJMLimaRESpringerAE (2017) Can environmental attributes influence protected area designation? A case study valuing preferences for springs in Grand Canyon National Park. Land Use Policy63: 196–205.
47.
OkelloMMYerianS (2009) Tourist satisfaction in relation to attractions and implications for conservation in the protected areas of the Northern Circuit, Tanzania. Journal of Sustainable Tourism17: 605–625.
48.
OkelloMMMankaSGD’AmourDE (2008) The relative importance of large mammal species for tourism in Amboseli National Park, Kenya. Tourism Management29: 751–760.
49.
Oromia Agriculture and Rural Development Bureau (OARDB) (2007) Bale Mountains National Park General Management Plan 2007–2017. Oromia Agriculture and Rural Development Bureau (OARDB), Oromia National Regional State.
50.
PanditRDhakalMPolyakovM (2015) Valuing access to protected areas in Nepal: the case of Chitwan National Park. Tourism Management50: 1–12.
51.
ReynoldsPCBraithwaiteD (2001) Towards a conceptual framework for wildlife tourism. Tourism Management22: 31–42.
52.
SaaymanMSaaymanA (2014) Who is willing to pay to see the Big 7?Tourism Economics20: 1181–1198.
53.
Sillero-ZubiriCMacdonaldD (1997) The Ethiopian Wolf: Status Survey and Conservation Action Plan. Gland, Switzerland, and Cambridge: IUCN/SSC Canid Specialist Group.
54.
SkibinsJC (2015) Ambassadors or attractions? Disentangling the role of flagship species in wildlife tourism. In: MarkwellK (ed), Animals and Tourism: Understanding Diverse Relationships. Bristol: Channel View, pp. 256–273.
55.
SkibinsJCPowellRHalloJ (2016) Lucky 13: conservation implications of broadening “Big 5” flagship species recognition in East Africa. Journal of Sustainable Tourism24: 1024–1040.
56.
StephensPAd’SaCASillero-ZubiriC, et al. (2001) Impact of livestock and settlement on the large mammalian wildlife of Bale Mountains National Park, southern Ethiopia. Biological Conservation100: 307–322.
57.
TapsuwanSBurtonMPerriamJ (2010) A multivariate probit analysis of willingness to pay for cave conservation: a case study of Yanchep National Park, Western Australia. Tourism Economics16: 1019–1035.
58.
TisdellC (1995) Investment in ecotourism: assessing its economics. Tourism Economics1: 375–387.
59.
TisdellCWilsonC (2001) Wildlife-based tourism and increased support for nature conservation financially and otherwise: evidence from sea turtle ecotourism at Mon Repos. Tourism Economics7: 233–249.
60.
TrainK (1999) Halton sequences for mixed logit. Working Paper, Department of Economics, University of California, Berkeley.
61.
TrainK (2009) Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Van ZylH (2015) The Economic Value and Potential of Protected Areas in Ethiopia. Addis Ababa: Ethiopian Wildlife Conservation Agency.
64.
WilliamsCKEricssonGHeberleinTA (2002) A quantitative summary of attitudes toward wolves and their reintroduction (1972–2000). Wildlife Society Bulletin (1973-2006)30: 575–584.
65.
WilliamsSVivero PolJLSpawlsS, et al. (2004) Ethiopian highlands. In: MittermeierRAGillPRHoffmannMPilgrimJBrooksTMittermeierCGLamoreuxJDa FonsecaGAB (eds) Hotspots Revisited. Washington: CEMEX Publisher, pp. 262–273.
66.
WilsonMAHeberleinTA (1996) The wolf, the tourist, and the recreational context: new opportunity or uncommon circumstance?Human Dimensions of Wildlife1: 38–53.
67.
WoodEM (2002) Ecotourism: Principles, Practices and Policies for Sustainability. New York: United Nations Publications.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
