Many recent discussions of the decline of party are predicated on the assumption that the Duverger/socialist mass-party model is the only model for parties. We contend that this assumption is misconceived, that the mass-party model is only one, temporally limited and contingent model, and that it is necessary to differentiate notions of adaptation and change from notions of decline or failure. Following an analysis of how various models of party can be located in terms of the relationship between civil society and the state, we contend that the recent period has witnessed the emergence of a new model of party, the cartel party, in which colluding parties become agents of the state and employ the resources of the state (the party state) to ensure their own collective survival. Finally, we suggest that the recent challenge to party is in fact a challenge to the cartel that the established parties have created for themselves.
Beer, Samuel H. (1969) Modern British Politics, 2nd edn.London: Faber and Faber.
2.
Castles, Francis , ed. (1982) The Impact of Parties. London: Sage.
3.
Dahl, Robert (1956) A Preface to Democratic Theory. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
4.
Dalton, Russell and Kuechler, Manfred, eds (1990) Challenging the Political Order: New Social and Political Movements in Western Democracies. New York: Oxford University Press.
5.
Downs, Anthony (1957) An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper & Row.
6.
Duverger, Maurice (1954) Political Parties: Their Organization and Activities in the Modern State. London: Methuen.
7.
Einhorn, Eric S. and Logue, John (1988) `Continuity and Change in the Scandinavian Party Systems', in Steven B. Wolinetz (ed.) Parties and Party Systems in Liberal Democracies, pp. 159-202. London: Routledge.
8.
Epstein, Leon (1986) Political Parties in the American Mold. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
9.
Finer, S. E. (1984) `The Decline of Party?', in Vernon Bogdanor (ed.) Parties and Democracy in Britain and America, pp. 1-6. New York: Praeger.
10.
Fiorina, Morris (1981) Retrospective Voting in American National Elections. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
11.
Fisher, Stephen L. (1980) `The “Decline of Parties” Thesis and the Role of Minor Parties', in Peter H. Merkl (ed.) Western European Party Systems: Trends and Prospects. New York: Free Press.
12.
Katz, Richard S. and Mair, Peter, eds (1992) Party Organizations: A Data Handbook on Party Organizations in Western Democracies, 1960-90. London: Sage.
13.
Kirchheimer, Otto (1966) `The Transformation of West European Party Systems', in Joseph LaPalombara and Myron Weiner (eds) Political Parties and Political Development, pp. 177-200. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
14.
Lawson, Kay , ed. (1980) Political Parties and Linkage: A Comparative Perspective. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
15.
Lawson, Kay (1988) `When Linkage Fails', in Kay Lawson and Peter H. Merkl (eds) When Parties Fail. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
16.
Lawson, Kay and Merkl, Peter H. (1988) `Alternative Organizations: Environmental, Supplementary, Communitarian, and Antiauthoritarian', in Kay Lawson and Peter H. Merkl (eds) When Parties Fail. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
17.
Lipset, S. M. and Rokkan, Stein (1967) `Cleavage Structures, Party Systems and Voter Alignments: an Introduction', in S. M. Lipset and Stein Rokkan (eds) Party Systems and Voter Alignments, pp. 1-63. New York: The Free Press.
18.
Mair, Peter (1994) `Party Organizations: From Civil Society to the State', in Richard S. Katz and Peter Mair (eds) How Parties Organize: Change and Adaptation in Party Organizations in Western Democracies. London: Sage.
19.
Mayhew, David R. (1974) Congress: The Electoral Connection. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
20.
Michels, Robert (1962 [1911]) Political Parties: A Sociological Study of the Oligarchical Tendencies of Modern Democracies. New York: The Free Press.
21.
Neumann, Sigmund (1956) `Towards a Comparative Study of Political Parties', in Sigmund Neumann (ed.) Modern Political Parties, pp. 395-421. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
22.
Ostrogorski, M. I. (1902) Democracy and the Organization of Political Parties. London: Macmillan.
23.
Panebianco, Angelo (1988) Political Parties: Organisation and Power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
24.
Pizzorno, Allesandro (1981) `Interests and Parties in Pluralism', in Suzanne D. Berger (ed.) Organizing Interests in Western Europe, pp. 247-284. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
25.
Poguntke, Thomas (1994) `Explorations into a Minefield: Anti-Party Sentiment - Conceptual Thoughts and Empirical Evidence', paper presented to the Workshop on Anti-Party Sentiment, ECPR Joint Sessions, Madrid.
26.
Pomper, Gerald M. (1992) `Concepts of Political Parties', Journal of Theoretical Politics4(2): 143-159.
27.
Ranney, Austin (1962) The Doctrine of Responsible Party Government. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
28.
Rose, Richard and McAllister, Ian (1986) Voters Begin to Choose: From Closed-Class to Open Elections in Britain. London: Sage.
29.
Sainsbury, Diane , ed. (1990) Party Strategies and Party-Voter Linkages, special issue of the European Journal of Political Research 18.
30.
Scarrow, Susan (1994) `The Consequences of Anti-Party Sentiment: Anti-Party Arguments as Instruments of Change', paper presented to the Workshop on Anti-Party Sentiment, ECPR Joint Sessions, Madrid.
31.
Selle, Per and Svåsand, Lars (1991) `Membership in Party Organizations and the Problem of Decline of Parties', Comparative Political Studies23: 459-477.
32.
Truman, David (1951) The Governmental Process. New York: Knopf.
33.
Webb, Paul D. (1994) `Party Organizational Change in Britain: The Iron Law of Centralization?', in Richard S. Katz and Peter Mair (eds) How Parties Organize: Change and Adaptation in Party Organizations in Western Democracies. London: Sage.
