This study examines how partisan control of state government influences three important state wage policies over the 1968 – 2018 period: minimum wage laws, prevailing wage laws, and right-to-work laws. Using time series fixed-effects regression and probit event history analysis we find that Unified Democratic control of a state’s government results in more egalitarian wage policies while Unified Republican control leads to less egalitarian wage policies.
AlesinaAGlaeserE (2004) Fighting Poverty in the US and Europe: A World of Difference. Oxford UK: Oxford University Press.
2.
AlesinaALondreganJRosenthalH (1993) A model of the political economy of the United States. American Political Science Review1: 12–33.
3.
AutorDManningASmithCL (2015) The Contribution of the Minimum Wage to U.S. Wage Inequality over Three Decades: A Reassessment. Pennsylvania: DIANE Publishing.
4.
BartelsL. (2008) Unequal Democracy: The Political Economy of the New Gilded Age, 1st editionPrinceton: Princeton University Press.
5.
BartelsB (2015) Beyond fixed versus random effects: a framework for improving substantive and statistical analysis of panel, time-series cross-sectional, and multilevel data. In: FranzeseR (ed) Quantitative Research in Political Science. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
6.
BartelsL. (2016) Unequal Democracy: The Political Economy of the New Gilded Age, 2nd editionPrinceton: Princeton University Press.
7.
BechtelMMLieschR (2020) Reforms and redistribution: disentangling the egoistic and sociotropic origins of voter preferences. Public Opinion Quarterly84: 1–23.
8.
BesleyTCaseA. (2003) “Political institutions and policy choices:evidence from the United States.” Journal ofEconomicLiterature41(1):7–73.
9.
BinderC (2019) Inequality and the inflation tax. Journal of Macroeconomics61: 103122.
10.
BlinderASEsakiHY (1978) Macroeconomic activity and income distribution in the postwar United States. The Review of Economics and Statistics60(4): 604–609.
11.
BowlerSDonovanT (2004) Measuring the effect of direct democracy on state policy: not all initiatives are created equal. State Politics and Policy Quarterly4(3): 345–363.
12.
Box-SteffensmeierJMJonesBS (2004) Event History Modeling: A Guide for Social Scientists. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
13.
BucciLJansaJ (2021) Who passes restrictive labour policy? A view from the states. Journal of Public Policy41(3): 409–439.
14.
CaugheyDWarshawC (2016) The dynamics of state policy liberalism: 1936-2014. American Journal of Political Science60: 899–913.
15.
CaugheyDWarshawC. (2018) “Policy preferences and policy change: dynamic responsiveness in the American states, 1936-2014,” American Political Science Review112 (2): 249–266.
16.
CaugheyDWarshawC. (2022) Dynamic Democracy: Public Opinion, Elections, and Policymaking in the American States. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
17.
CaugheyDXuYWarshawC (2017) Incremental democracy: the policy effects of partisan control of state government. The Journal of Politics79(4): 1342–1358.
18.
ChenAS (2007) The party of lincoln and the politics of state fair employment practices legislation in the north, 1945–1964. American Journal of Sociology112(6): 1713–1774.
19.
DiSalvoDFlavinPHartneyM (2023) State labor laws and government responsiveness to public opinion. Political Research Quarterly76(3): 1475–1485.
20.
El HarradiMde HaanJLeroyA (2021) Inflation and the income share of the rich: evidence for 14 OECD countries. Society for the Study of Income Inequality69: 170–194.
21.
EriksonRSMacKuenMBStimsonJA (2002) The Macro Polity. New York: Cambridge University Press.
22.
FalkAFehrEZehnderC (2006) Fairness perceptions and reservation wages: the behavioral effects of minimum wage laws. Quarterly Journal of Economics121(4 (November): 1347–1381.
FeldmanSZallerJ (1992) The political culture of ambivalence: ideological responses to the welfare state. American Journal of Political Science36: 268–307.
FrankoWWWitkoC (2018) The New Economic Populism: How States Respond to Economic Inequality. New York: Oxford University Press.
27.
FredrikssonPGWangLWarrenPL (2013) Party politics, governors, and economic policy. Southern Economic Journal80(1): 106–126.
28.
GilensM (2009) Why Americans Hate Welfare: Race, Media, and the Politics of Antipoverty Policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
29.
GrossmanMHopkinsD (2016) Asymmetric Politics: Ideological Republicans and Group Interest Democrats. New York: Oxford University Press.
30.
HackerJSPiersonP, (2010) Winner-take-all Politics: How Washington Made the Rich Richer—And Turned its Back on the Middle Class. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
31.
HatchMERigbyE (2015) Laboratories of (in) equality? Redistributive policy and income inequality in the A merican S tates. Policy Studies Journal43(2): 163–187.
32.
HayesTJXavier Medina VidalD (2015) Fiscal policy and economic inequality in the U.S. States: taxing and spending from 1976-2006. Political Research Quarterly68: 392–427.
33.
HibbsDAJr. (1977) Political Parties and Macroeconomic Policy. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, Vol. 71, 1467–1487.
34.
HibbsDA (1987) The American Political Economy: Macroeconomics and Electoral Politics. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
35.
HibbsDAJr.DennisC (1988) Income distribution in the United States. American Political Science Review82: 467–490.
36.
JacobsDDixonM (2006) The politics of labor-management relations: detecting the conditions that affect changes in right-to-work laws. Social Problems53: 118–137.
37.
JonesAFJr.WeinbergDH (2000) Change in the Income Inequality of Families: 1947-1998. Maryland: US Bureau of the Census.
38.
KellyNJ (2005) Political Choice, Public Policy, and Distributional Outcomes American. Journal of Political Science, 49, 865–880.
39.
KellyNJ (2009) The Politics of Income Inequality in the United States. New York: Cambridge University Press.
40.
KellyNJ (2019) America’s Inequality Trap. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
41.
KellyNJEnnsPK (2010) Inequality and the dynamics of public opinion: the self-reinforcing link between inequality and mass preferences. American Journal of Political Science54: 855–870.
42.
KellyNJWitkoC (2012) Federalism and American inequality. The Journal of Politics74: 414–426.
43.
KelsayMSturgeonJIPinkhamKD. (2011) “The Adverse Economic Impact from Repeal of the Prevailing Wage Law in Missouri,” Mimeo. Klarner, Carl: University of Missouri-Kansas City. https://www.klarnerpolitics.org/
44.
KoniskyDM (2007) Regulatory competition and environmental enforcement: is there a race to the bottom?American Journal of Political Science4: 853–872.
45.
LeboMJCassinoD (2007) The aggregated consequences of motivated reasoning and the dynamics of presidential approval. Political Psychology28: 719–746.
46.
LeighA (2008) Estimating the impact of gubernatorial partisanship on policy settings and economic outcomes:A regression discontinuity approach. European Journal of Political Economy24(1): 256–268.
47.
Levin-WaldmanOM (1998) Exploring the politics of the minimum wage. Journal of Economic Issues32: 773–802.
48.
LuttigM (2013) The structure of inequality and Americans’ attitudes toward redistribution. Public Opinion Quarterly77(3): 811–821.
49.
MeltzerAHRichardS (1981) A rational theory of the size of government. Journal of Political Economy89(5): 914–927.
50.
MettlerS (2018) The Government-Citizen Disconnect. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
51.
MooreWJ (1998) The determinants and effects of right-to-work laws: a review of the recent literature. Journal of Labor Research19: 445–469.
PetersM. (2009) “The Economic and Political Determinants of Minimum Wage Legislation,” College of New Jersey. New York: Mimeo.
54.
PooleKTRosenthalH (1991) The spatial mapping of minimum wage legislation. In: AlesinaACarlinerG (eds). Politics and Economics in Eighties. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 215–250.
55.
ReedWR (2006) Democrats, Republicans, and taxes: evidence that political parties matter. Journal of Public Economics90(4): 725–750.
56.
ShambaughJNunnRLiuP, et al. (2017) Thirteen Facts about Wage Growth. Washington, D.C.: The Hamilton Project.
57.
ShorBMcCartyN (2011) The ideological mapping of American legislatures. American Political Science Review3: 530–551.
58.
SimonovitsGBorA (2023) Stability and change in the opinion-policy relationship: evidence from minimum wage laws. Research & Politics10: 1–7.
59.
SimonovitsGGuessANaglerJ (2019) “Responsiveness without representation: evidence from minimum wage laws in U.S. States,” American Journal of Political Science63: 401-410.
60.
StevensonRT (2001) The economy and policy mood: a fundamental dynamic of democratic politics?American Journal of Political Science45: 620–633.
WhitakerEAHerianMNLarimerCW, et al. (2012) The determinants of policy introduction and bill adoption: examining minimum wage increases in the American states, 1997-2006. Policy Studies Journal40(4): 626–649.
63.
WidestromAHayesTJDennisC (2018) The effect of political parties on the distribution of income in the American states: 1917-2011. Social Science Quarterly99: 895–914.
64.
WitkoCMorganJKellyNJ, et al. (2021) Hijacking the Agenda: Economic Power and Political Influence. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
