Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2025-7
Multi-level empowerment strategies: Regionalist parties’ territory-oriented legislative initiative in the regional,statewide and European parliamentary arenas
In the European Union (EU), parties operate on the regional, the state, and the supranational levels. Exploring how parties behave legislatively from a cross-level perspective, this paper evaluates the territory-oriented legislation introduced by three regionalist parties – Südtiroler Volkspartei, Femu a Corsica, and Plaid Cymru – in all parliaments they occupy (from 2018 to 2022). The parties initiate greater self-government, autonomy safeguards, and concrete region-oriented policies in the regional and statewide parliaments. Meanwhile, many specific, state-addressed proposals are generalised to all European regions in the Committee of the Regions and the European Parliament (as are all demands directed to the EU) and concern the protection of ethnic minorities, regional development, and regional involvement in EU policies. Drawing on novel parliamentary data, this three-level study reveals multi-level legislative strategies of a distinct party family aimed at territorial empowerment while exposing available legislative channels and routes of interaction across the levels of governance.
AbelsGEpplerA (eds) (2015) Subnational Parliaments in the EU Multi-Level Parliamentary System: Taking Stock of the Post-Lisbon Era. Studienverlag: Innsbruck Wien Bozen: Studienverlag. Foster Europe - international studies series volume 3.
2.
AcquavivaJF (2019) Avec l’ALE et Oriol Junqueras, cap sur les européennes (accessed 12 November 12 2022).
3.
AlonsoSGómezBCabezaL (2013) Measuring centre–periphery preferences: the regional manifestos project. Regional & Federal Studies23(2): 189–211.
4.
AmatFFalcó-GimenoA (2014) The legislative dynamics of political decentralization in parliamentary democracies. Comparative Political Studies47(6): 820–850.
5.
BombergEPetersonJ (1998) European union decision making: the role of sub-national Authorities. Political Studies46(2): 219–235.
6.
BraunDSchmittH (2020) Different emphases, same positions? The election manifestos of political parties in the EU multilevel electoral system compared. Party Politics26(5): 640–650.
7.
BraunDHutterSKerscherA (2016) What type of Europe? The salience of polity and policy issues in European Parliament elections. European Union Politics17(4): 570–592.
8.
CeronA (2015) The politics of fission: an analysis of faction breakaways among Italian parties (1946–2011). British Journal of Political Science45(1): 121–139.
9.
ComanEE (2009) Reassessing the influence of party groups on individual members of the European parliament. West European Politics32(6): 1099–1117.
10.
ConversiDFriis HauM (2021) Green nationalism. Climate action and environmentalism in left nationalist parties. Environmental Politics: 1–22.
11.
De WinterL (2003) Conclusion. A comparative analysis of the electoral, office and policy success of ethnoregionalist parties. In: De WinterLTürsanH (eds) Regionalist Parties in Western Europe. London: Routledge, 204–247.
12.
De WinterLCachafeiroMG-R (2002) European integration and ethnoregionalist parties. Party Politics8(4): 483–503.
13.
De WinterLGómez-Reino CachafeiroMLynchP (2006) Introduction: autonomist parties in European politics. In: De WinterLGómez-Reino CachafeiroMLynchP (eds) Autonomist Parties in Europe: Identity Politics and the Revival of the Territorial Cleavage. Barcelona: Institut de Ciències Polítiques i Socials, 11–30. Workshop Barcelona 21.
14.
DeschouwerK (2003) Political parties in multi-layered systems. European Urban and Regional Studies10(3): 213–226.
15.
DöringHHallerbergM (eds) (2004) Patterns of Parliamentary Behavior: Passage of Legislation across Western Europe. Aldershot, Hants, England; Burlington, VT: Ashgate.
16.
EliasA (2009) Minority Nationalist Parties and European Integration. New York, NY: Routledge.
17.
EliasATronconiF (2011) From protest to power: autonomist parties in government. Party Politics17(4): 505–524.
18.
EliasABasileLFranco-GuillénN,et al. (2021) The Framing Territorial Demands (FraTerr) dataset: a novel approach to conceptualizing and measuring regionalist actors’ territorial strategies. Regional & Federal Studies33(3): 355–370.
19.
FagerholmA (2016) Ethnic and regionalist parties in Western Europe: a party family? Ethnic and regionalist parties. Studies in Ethnicity and Nationalism16(2): 304–339.
20.
FieldBNHamannK (2015) Framing legislative bills in parliament: regional-nationalist parties’ strategies in Spain’s multinational democracy. Party Politics21(6): 900–911.
21.
HeinischRMassettiEMazzoleniO (eds) (2020) The People and the Nation: Populism and Ethno-Territorial Politics in Europe. Routledge Studies in Extremism and Democracy. London; New York, NY: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.
22.
HepburnE (2010) Using Europe: Territorial Party Strategies in a Multi-Level System. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
23.
HoleschAJordanaJ (2021) The politics of unilateral secession in the European Union: the case of Catalonia. Territory, Politics, Governance: 1–20.
24.
HuwylerOTathamMBlatterJ (2018) Party politics, institutions, and identity: the dynamics of regional venue shopping in the EU. West European Politics41(3): 754–778.
KeatingMLoughlinJSchuman CentreR (eds) (1997) The political economy of regionalism. The Cass Series in Regional and Federal Studies 1]. London; Portland, OR: Frank Cass.
27.
KellermannM (2013) Sponsoring early day motions in the British House of commons as a response to electoral vulnerability. Political Science Research and Methods1(2): 263–280.
LoweWBenoitKMikhaylovS,et al. (2011) Scaling policy preferences from coded political texts. Legislative Studies Quarterly36(1): 123–155.
30.
LynchPDe WinterL (2008) The shrinking political space of minority nationalist parties in an enlarged Europe of the regions. Regional & Federal Studies18(5): 583–606.
31.
MassettiE (2020) Let down by Europe? Secessionist regionalist parties and the EU’s reactions vis-à-vis attempts to achieve ‘independence in Europe. In: AntunesS (ed) Self-Determination in a Context of Shared Sovereignty. Brussels: Coppieters Foundation, 68–81.
32.
MassettiESchakelAH (2021) From staunch supporters to critical observers: Explaining the turn towards Euroscepticism among regionalist parties. European Union Politics22(3): 425–445.
33.
MassettiE (2022) The European Union and the challenge of ‘independence in Europe’: straddling between (formal) neutrality and (actual) support for member-states’ territorial integrity. Regional & Federal Studies32(3): 307–330.
34.
MazzoleniOMuellerS (2017a) Introduction: explaining the policy success of regionalist parties in Western Europe. In: MazzoleniOMuellerS (eds) Regionalist Parties in Western Europe: Dimensions of Success. Party Families in Europe. London ; New York, NY: Routledge, 1–21.
35.
MazzoleniOMuellerS (eds) (2017b). Regionalist Parties in Western Europe: Dimensions of Success. London; New York, NY: Routledge. Party families in Europe.
36.
McEwenNMurphyMC (2022) Brexit and the union: territorial voice, exit and re-entry strategies in Scotland and Northern Ireland after EU exit. International Political Science Review43(3): 374–389.
37.
MeijersMJVeerH (2019) MEP responses to democratic backsliding in Hungary and Poland. An analysis of agenda‐setting and voting behaviour. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies57(4): 838–856.
38.
PallaverG (2017) The Südtiroler Volkspartei: sucess through conflict, failure through consensus. In: MazzoleniOMuellerS (eds) Regionalist Parties in Western Europe: Dimensions of Success. Party Families in Europe. London; New York, NY: Routledge, 107–135.
39.
ParkerJ (2022) Europe’s secessionist movements and Covid-19. Nationalities Papers50(1): 118–129.
40.
PartituU (2023) A dichjarazione di i Principii. Femu a Corsica (accessed 13 March 2023).
41.
PC (2021) Vote for Wales: Let’s Face the Future Together. Senedd Election Manifesto. Cardiff: Plaid Cymru (accessed 18 November 2021).
42.
PiattoniSSchönlauJ (2015) The Committee of the Regions and the debate on EU cohesion policy (2014–20): exercising voice to promote territorial cohesion. In: PiattoniSSchönlauJ (eds) Shaping EU Policy from below: EU Democracy and the Committee of the Regions. New Horizons in European Politics. Cheltenham Northampton: Edward Elgar, 106–131.
43.
RemschelTKroeberC (2022) Every single word: a new data set including all parliamentary materials published in Germany. Government and Opposition57(2): 276–295.
44.
RicciS (2011) The committee of the regions and the challenge of European governance. In: PanaraCBeckerAde (eds) The Role of the Regions in EU Governance. Berlin ; New York: Springer, 109–129.
45.
SchakelAH (2021) Regional spillover into third‐order European elections. Governance34(3): 643–663.
46.
Shair-RosenfieldSSchakelAHNiedzwieckiS,et al. (2021) Language difference and regional authority. Regional & Federal Studies31(1): 73–97.
47.
SiebererUSaalfeldTOhmuraT,et al. (2020) Roll-call votes in the German bundestag: a new dataset, 1949–2013. British Journal of Political Science50(3): 1137–1145.
48.
SoraceM (2018) Legislative Participation in the EU: an analysis of questions, speeches, motions and declarations in the 7th European Parliament. European Union Politics19(2): 299–320.
49.
SVP (2022) Jetzt mehr denn je. Autonomie wählen! Parlamentswahlen 2022. Südtiroler Volkspartei. Flugblatt, pp. 1-12.
50.
SVP (2016) SVP-Grundsatzprogramm. Südtiroler Volkspartei. Genehmigt durch die 62. ordentliche Landesversammlung. 7. Mai 2016.
51.
TathamM (2008) Going Solo: direct regional representation in the European union. Regional & Federal Studies18(5): 493–515.
52.
TathamMHoogheLMarksG (2021) The territorial architecture of government. Governance34(3): 607–620.
53.
TerrièreL (2021) With respect for the core business’: on regionalist parties and their minister portfolios in government. Territory, Politics, Governance11(8): 1689–1708.
54.
ThomsonRRoyedTNaurinE,et al. (2017) The fulfillment of parties’ election pledges: a comparative study on the impact of power sharing. American Journal of Political Science61(3): 527–542.
55.
ToubeauSMassettiE (2013) The party politics of territorial reforms in Europe. West European Politics36(2): 297–316.
56.
TrummS (2021) Explaining support for Brexit among parliamentary candidates: the case of Wales. British Politics16(1): 58–73.
57.
TuttnauerO (2018) If you can beat them, confront them: party-level analysis of opposition behavior in European national parliaments. European Union Politics19(2): 278–298.
58.
The European Parliament, 2020/0380(COD), Amendment 73, 31 March 2021.
59.
The European Parliament, PE703.134v01-00, Amendment 47, 12 January 2022.
60.
Senedd, OPIN-2020-0151, 24 January 2020.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
