The impact of party primaries on turnout at the meso level has been particularly under-researched. Thus, the aim of this paper is to explore the determinants of turnout on party primaries by employing an original dataset comprising over 300 selection processes of candidates and leaders in Spain from 1991 to 2021 at both the national and regional level. One of our main findings suggests, in line with what has been affirmed by previous literature, a positive impact of competitiveness on turnout. We also find some contradictory effects of ideology on turnout: as expected most left-wing parties have better turnout averages than right-wing parties, but turnout is higher in primaries organised by right-wing parties. In addition, the type of primaries and the (online-offline) format of the event also appear to be a relevant factor shaping participation.
AchurySScarrowSEKosiara-PedersenK, et al. (2020) The consequences of membership incentives: do greater political benefits attract different kinds of members?Party Politics26(1): 56–68. DOI: 10.1177/1354068818754603.
2.
AstudilloJDetterbeckK (2020) Why, sometimes, primaries? Intraparty democratization as a default selection mechanism in German and Spanish mainstream parties. Party Politics26(5): 594–604.
3.
AtkesonLR (2003) Not all cues are created equal: the conditional impact of female candidates on political engagement. The Journal of Politics65(4): 1040–1061. DOI: 10.1111/1468-2508.T01-1-00124/0.
4.
AtkesonLMaestasC (2016) Presidential primary turnout 1972–2016. PS: Political Science and Politics49(4): 755–760. DOI: 10.1017/S1049096516001608.
5.
BarberàOLisiMRodríguez-TeruelJ (2015) Democratising party leadership selection in Spain and Portugal. In: SandriGSeddoneAVenturinoF (eds) Party Primaries in Comparative Perspective. Farnham: Ashgate, 59–84.
6.
BarratJPérez-MoneoM (2019) La digitalización de los partidos políticos y el uso del voto electrónico. Cizur Menor: Thomson Reuters-Aranzadi.
7.
BiezenIvanPiccioDR (2013) Shaping intra-party democracy: on the legal regulation of internal party organizations. In: CrossWPKatzRS (eds) The Challenges of Intra-party Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 24–48.
8.
BirchS (2010) Perceptions of electoral fairness and voter turnout. Comparative Political Studies43(12): 1601–1622. DOI: 10.1177/0010414010374021.
9.
BirchS (2016) Full Participation. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
10.
BlaisA (2006) What affects voter turnout?Annual Review of Political Science9(1): 111–125. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.polisci.9.070204.105121.
11.
BlaisADobrzynskaA (1998) Turnout in electoral democracies. European Journal of Political Research33: 239–261.
12.
BoatrightRGMoscardelliVGVickreyCD (2020) Primary election timing and voter turnout. Election Law Journal: Rules, Politics, and Policy19(4): 472–485. DOI: 10.1089/elj.2019.0583.
13.
BruhnK (2010) Too much democracy? primaries and candidate success in the 2006 mexican national elections. Latin American Politics and Society52(4): 25–52. DOI: 10.1111/j.1548-2456.2010.00097.x.
14.
BühlmannMFreitagM (2006) Individual and contextual determinants of electoral participation. Swiss Political Science Review12(4): 13–47. DOI: 10.1002/j.1662-6370.2006.tb00059.x.
15.
CampbellAConverseMillerPEWEStokesDE (1976) The American Voter. New York/London: University of Chicago Press.
16.
CancelaJGeysB (2016) Explaining voter turnout: a meta-analysis of national and subnational elections. Electoral Studies42: 264–275. DOI: 10.1016/J.ELECTSTUD.2016.03.005.
17.
CancelaJDiasALLisiM (2017) The impact of endorsements in intra-party elections: evidence from open primaries in a new Portuguese party. Politics37(2): 167–183. DOI: 10.1177/0263395716680125.
18.
CoxGW (1988) Closeness and turnout: a methodological note. The Journal of Politics50(3): 768–775. DOI: 10.2307/2131467.
19.
CrossWPPruysersS (2019) Sore losers? The cost of intra-party democracy. Party Politics25(4): 483–494.
20.
CrossWPKenigOPruysersS, et al. (2016) The Promise and Challenge of Party Primary Elections. A Comparative Perspective. Montreal: McGuill-Queen’s University Press.
21.
DeseriisMVittoriD (2019) The impact of online participation platforms on the internal democracy of two southern European parties: podemos and the five star movement. International Journal of Communication13: 5696–5714.
22.
DuvergerM (1954) Political Parties: Their Organization and Activity in the Modern State. New York: John Wiley & Son.
23.
GallegoA (2010) Understanding unequal turnout: education and voting in comparative perspective. Electoral Studies29(2): 239–248. DOI: 10.1016/J.ELECTSTUD.2009.11.002.
24.
GerbaudoP (2019) The Digital Party: Political Organisation and Online Democracy. London: Pluto Press.
25.
GeysB (2006) “Rational” theories of voter turnout: a review. Political Studies Review4(1): 16–35. DOI: 10.1111/j.1478-9299.2006.00034.x.
26.
HaselmayerM (2019) Negative campaigning and its consequences: a review and a look ahead. French Politics17(3): 355–372. DOI: 10.1057/s41253-019-00084-8.
27.
HazanRYRahatG (2010) Democracy within Parties. Candidate Selection Methods and Their Political Consequences. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
28.
HiranoSSnyderJMJr (2012) Primary Elections and Political Accountability: What Happens to Incumbents in Scandals?Working Papers. Cambridge, United States: Department of Government, Harvard University.
29.
HopkinJ (2001) Bringing the members back in? democratizing candidate selection in Britain and Spain. Party Politics7(3): 343–361. DOI: 10.1177/1354068801007003005.
30.
IndridasonIH (2008) Competition and turnout: the majority run-off as a natural experiment. Electoral Studies27(4): 699–710. DOI: 10.1016/J.ELECTSTUD.2008.05.006.
31.
Jaime-CastilloAMCollerXCorderoG (2018) New parties and new ways of candidate selection in Spain. In: CorderoGCollerX (eds) Democratizing Candidates Selection. New Methods, Old Receipts?London: Palgrave, 226–242.
32.
KamarckEC (2018) Primary Politics: Everything You Need to Know about How America Nominates its Presidential Candidates. 3rd edition. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
33.
KarpJBanducciS (2008) Political efficacy and participation in twenty-seven democracies: how electoral systems shape political behaviour. British Journal of Political Science38(2): 311–334. DOI: 10.1017/S0007123408000161.
34.
KatzRy CrossWP (2013) Problematizing intra-party democracy. In: CrossWPKatzy R (eds) The Challenges of Intra-party Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 170–176.
35.
KenigO (2009) Democratization of party leadership selection: do wider selectorates produce more competitive contests?Electoral Studies28: 240–247. DOI: 10.1016/j.electstud.2008.11.001.
36.
KenigOy PruysersS (2018) The challenges of inclusive intra-party selection methods. In: CorderoGCollerX (eds) Democratizing Candidates Selection. New Methods, Old Receipts?. London: Palgrave, 25–48.
37.
KenigORahatGHazanRY (2015) Leadership selection versus candidate selection: similarities and differences. In: SandriGSeddoneAVenturinoF (eds) Party Primaries in Comparative Perspective. Farnham: Ashgate, 21–40.
38.
LazarsfeldPFBerelsonBGaudetH (1949) The People’s Choice. How the Voter Makes up His Mind in a Presidential Campaign. New York: Duell, Sloan, and Pearce.
39.
LengleJIOwenDSonnerMW (1995) Divisive nominating mechanisms and democratic party electoral prospects. The Journal of Politics57(2): 370–383. DOI: 10.2307/2960311.
40.
LisiMFreireABarberàO (2015) Leadership selection methods and party types. In: CrossWPPiletJB (eds) The Politics of Party Leadership: A Cross-National Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 12–30.
41.
MacKinnonJGWhiteH (1985) Some heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimators with improved finite sample properties. Journal of Econometrics29: 305–3025.
42.
Martínez-CantóJAstudilloJ (2021) The outcomes of party primaries: (Dis)continuity in top candidates’ political and partisan profiles. In: SandriGSeddoneA (eds) New Paths for Selecting Political Elites. Investigating the Impact of Inclusive Candidate and Party Leader Selection Methods. Abingdon: Routledge, 66–81.
43.
MullerENOppK-D (1986) Rational choice and rebellious collective action. American Political Science Review80(2): 471–487.
44.
NorranderB (1986) Measuring primary turnout in aggregate analysis. Political Behavior8(4): 356–373. DOI: 10.1007/BF00988437/METRICS.
45.
NorrisP (2002) Democratic Phoenix: Reinventing Political Activism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
46.
Pérez-MoneoM (2016) Regulating nominations in political parties: candidates, open primaries and Law. Ballot2(1): 27–54. DOI: 10.12957/ballot.2016.25568.
47.
PetitpasAJaquetJMSciariniP (2021) Does E-Voting matter for turnout, and to whom?Electoral Studies71: 102245. DOI: 10.1016/J.ELECTSTUD.2020.102245.
48.
PiletJBCrossWP (eds) (2014) The Selection of Political Party Leaders in Contemporary Parliamentary Democracies. London: Routledge.
49.
PotrafkeNRoeselF (2020) Opening hours of polling stations and voter turnout: evidence from a natural experiment. The Review of International Organizations15(1): 133–163. DOI: 10.1007/S11558-018-9305-8.
50.
RamiroL (2016) Effects of party primaries on electoral performance: the Spanish Socialist primaries in local elections. Party Politics22(1): 125–136. DOI: 10.1177/1354068813514884.
51.
Rodríguez-TeruelJy BarberàO (2017) Modelos, alternativas y consecuencias de la participación directa de las bases en los partidos. Zoom Político, 31/2017. Fundación Alternativas.
52.
RolfeM (2012) Voter Turnout: A Social Theory of Political Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
53.
SandriGSeddoneA (eds) (2021) New Paths for Selecting Political Elites. Investigating the Impact of Inclusive Candidate and Party Leader Selection Methods. Abingdon: Routledge.
54.
SandriGVenturinoF (2016) Primaries at the municipal level: how, how many and why. Contemporary Italian Politics8(1): 62–82. DOI: 10.1080/23248823.2016.1156306.
55.
SandriGSeddoneAVenturinoF (eds) (2015) Party Primaries in Comparative Perspective. Farnham: Ashgate.
56.
SeddoneAVenturinoFSandriG (2021) Living apart but together. members, sympathizers, and the Italian democratic party. Revista Internacional de Sociología79(4): e194. DOI: 10.3989/ris.2021.79.4.M21.06.
57.
SelbP (2009) A deeper look at the proportionality—turnout nexus. Comparative Political Studies42(4): 527–548.
58.
StataCorp (2021) Stata Base Reference Manual 17. College Station, TX: Stata Press.
59.
StaufferKEFiskCA (2022) Are you my candidate? gender, undervoting, and vote choice in same-party matchups. Politics and Gender18(3): 575–604. DOI: 10.1017/S1743923X20000677.
60.
StockemerD (2017) What affects voter turnout? A review article/meta-analysis of aggregate research. Government and Opposition52(4): 698–722. DOI: 10.1017/gov.2016.30.
61.
TanAC (1998) The impacts of party membership size: a cross-national analysis. The Journal of Politics60(1): 188–198. DOI: 10.2307/2648007.
62.
VerbaSNieNH (1972) Participation in America : Political Democracy and Social Equality. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
63.
VerbaSSchlozmanKLBradyHE (1995) Voice and Equality: Civic Voluntarism in American. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
64.
VillaplanaFR (2021) Los procesos de selección de líder en los partidos del sistema político español: evolución, democratización y primarias (1974-2018). PhD Thesis. University of Murcia. http://hdl.handle.net/10201/108422.
65.
VillaplanaFR (2023) Crisis competitiva y efecto contagio: la introducción de las primarias para la selección de líderes en España. Revista de Estudios Politicos200: 217–247. DOI: 10.18042/cepc/rep.200.08.
66.
VittoriD (2020) Membership and members’ participation in new digital parties: bring back the people?Comparative European Politics18(4): 609–629. DOI: 10.1057/s41295-019-00201-5.
67.
VowlesJKatzGStevensD (2017) Electoral competitiveness and turnout in British elections, 1964–2010. Political Science Research and Methods5(4): 775–794. DOI: 10.1017/PSRM.2015.67.
68.
WareA (1979) “Divisive” primaries: the important questions. British Journal of Political Science9(3): 381–384. DOI: 10.1017/S0007123400001861.
69.
WareA (2002) The American Direct Primary: Party Institutionalization and Transformation in the North. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
70.
WassHBlaisA‘Turnout’ArzheimerK, et al. (2017) The Sage Handbook of Electoral Behaviour. London and Thousand Oaks: Sage, 459–488.
71.
WautersB (2010) Explaining participation in intra-party elections: evidence from Belgian Political Parties. Party Politics16(2): 237–259. DOI: 10.1177/1354068809339541.
72.
WautersB (2015) Turnout rates in closed party leadership primaries: flash and fade out?Government and Opposition50(02): 218–239. DOI: 10.1017/gov.2013.45.
73.
WeldonS (2006) Downsize my polity? the impact of size on party membership and member activism. Party Politics12(4): 467–481. DOI: 10.1177/1354068806064729.
74.
WichowskyANieblerSE (2010) Narrow victories and hard games: revisiting the primary divisiveness hypothesis. American Politics Research38(6): 1052–1071. DOI: 10.1177/1532673X10369660.
75.
WuttkeAJungherrASchoenH (2019) More than opinion expression: secondary effects of intraparty referendums on party members. Party Politics25(6): 817–827. DOI: 10.1177/1354068817745729.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
