Labour policies have large impacts on gender equality in the workplace. While political parties play critical roles in policy making, it remains unclear if party-level women’s representation impacts labour policies. Therefore, this study examines the relationship between women’s representation in intra-party leadership and party policy positions on gender equality in employment. The analyses of 1,955 political parties in 169 countries from 1970 to 2019 find that a higher proportion of women in intra-party leadership results in the party taking stances more likely to favor gender equality in employment. Even among the parties we would expect to be the least women-friendly, a greater representation of women in intra-party leadership has positive influence. More women in leadership means stronger party support for gender equality regardless of ideological party placement. Furthermore, the findings also suggest that women party leaders have greater impacts on labour policies when a party leadership has greater decision-making power.
AldrichAS (2020) Party organization and gender in European elections. Party Politics26(5): 675–688.
2.
AtchisonA (2015) The impact of female cabinet ministers on a female-friendly labor environment. Journal of Women, Politics and Policy36(4): 388–414.
3.
AtchisonAIan Down (2009) Women cabinet ministers and female-friendly social policy. Poverty and Public Policy1(2): 1–23.
4.
CareyJMSoberg ShugartM (1995) Incentives to cultivate a personal vote: a rank ordering of electoral formulas. Electoral Studies14(4): 417–439.
5.
CaulM (1999) Women’s representation in parliament: the role of political parties. Party Politics5(1): 79–98.
6.
CeronA (2012) Bounded oligarchy: how and when factions constrain leaders in party position-taking. Electoral Studies31(4): 689–701.
7.
CharlesworthSMacdonaldF (2017) Employment regulation and worker-carers: reproducing gender inequality in the domestic and market spheres? In: PeetzDMurrayG (eds), Women, Labor Segmentation and Regulation: Varieties of Gender Gaps. New York: Palgrave Macmillan US. 79–96 DOI: 10.1057/978-1-137-55495-6_5.
8.
ChengCTavitsM (2011) Informal influences in selecting female political candidates. Political Research Quarterly64(2): 460–471.
9.
ChildsSarahKrookMona Lena (2008) Critical mass theory and women’s political representation. Political studies56(3): 725–736.
CrossWPPruysersS (2019) The local determinants of representation: party constituency associations, candidate nomination and gender. Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue Canadienne De Science Politique52(3): 557–574.
12.
Crowder-MeyerM (2013) Gendered recruitment without trying: how local party recruiters affect women’s representation. Politics and Gender9(4): 390–413.
13.
DoviS (2002) Preferable descriptive representation: will just any woman, black, or latino do?American Political Science Review96(4): 729–743.
14.
Ennser-JedenastikL (2017) How women’s political representation affects spending on family benefits. Journal of Social Policy46(3): 563–581.
15.
Espirito-SantoAFreireASerra-SilvaS (2020) Does women’s descriptive representation matter for policy preferences? The role of political parties. Party Politics26(2): 227–237.
16.
FunkKDLuis MolinaA (2022) Closing the gap: how mayors’ individual attributes affect gender wage disparities in local bureaucracies. Review of Public Personnel Administration42(3): 553–573.
17.
FunkKDSilvaTEscobar-LemmonMC (2019) Leading toward equality: the effect of women mayors on gender equality in local bureaucracies. Politics, Groups, and Identities7(3): 554–573.
18.
GreeneZO’BrienDZ (2016) Diverse parties, diverse agendas? Female politicians and the parliamentary party’s role in platform formation. European Journal of Political Research55: 435–453.
19.
HazanRY (2003) Introduction. Journal of Legislative Studies9(4): 1–11.
20.
HazanRYRahatG (2010) Democracy within Parties: Candidate Selection Methods and Their Political Consequences. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
21.
Itzkovitch-MalkaRHazanRY (2017) Unpacking party unity: the combined effects of electoral systems and candidate selection methods on legislative attitudes and behavioural norms. Political Studies65(2): 452–474.
22.
KatzRichardMairPeter (1993) The Evolution of Party Organizations in Europe: The Three Faces of Party Organization. American Review of Politics14(4): 593–617.
23.
KimNK (2022) When does women’s political power matter? Women’s representation and legal gender equality of economic opportunity across contexts. European Political Science Review14(4): 583–599.
24.
KittilsonMC (2006) Challenging Parties, Changing Parliaments: Women and Elected Office in Contemporary Western Europe. Columbus, OH: The Ohio State University Press.
25.
KittilsonMC (2008) Representing women: the adoption of family leave in comparative perspective. The Journal of Politics70(2): 323–334.
26.
KittilsonMC (2011) Women, parties and platforms in post-industrial democracies. Party Politics17(1): 66–92.
27.
KroeberCorinna (2022) How Parties Led by a Woman Redefine Their Positions: Empirical Evidence for Women’s Green, Alternative and Libertarian Agenda. European Journal of Political Research61(1): 175–193.
28.
KrookMona Lena (2009) Quotas for Women in Politics: Gender and Candidate Selection Reform Worldwide. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
29.
KunovichSPaxtonP (2005) Pathways to power: the role of political parties in women’s national political representation. American Journal of Sociology111(2): 505–552.
30.
LuhrmannADupontNHigashijimaM, et al (2020a) Varieties of party identity and organization (V–party) dataset V1. Varieties of democracy (V-Dem) project. Available at:https://www.v-dem.net/data/v-party-dataset/.
31.
LuhrmannADupontNHigashijimaM, et al (2020b) Codebook varieties of party identity and organisation (V-Party) V1” varieties of democracy (V–Dem) project. Available at:https://www.v-dem.net/data/v-party-dataset/.
NorrisPippaLovenduskiJoni (1995) Political Recruitment: Gender, Race and Class in the British Parliament. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
36.
OblerJeffrey (1973) The Role of National Party Leaders in the Selection of Parliamentary Candidates: the Belgian Case. Comparative Politics5(2): 158–184.
37.
O’ReillyJSmithMSimonD, et al. (2015) Equal pay as a moving target: international perspectives on forty-years of addressing the gender pay gap. Cambridge Journal of Economics39(2): 299–317.
38.
PaxtonPHughesMM (2015) The increasing effectiveness of national gender quotas, 1990-2010. Legislative Studies Quarterly40(3): 331–362.
39.
PaxtonPHughesMMBarnesTD (2014) Women, Politics, and Power: A Global Perspective. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Publications.
40.
PemsteinDMarquardtKLTselgovE, et al. (2020) The V–dem measurement model: latent variable analysis for cross–national and cross–temporal expert–coded data. V–Dem Working Paper No. 21. 5th edition. Gothenburg, Sweden: University of Gothenburg: Varieties of Democracy Institute.
41.
PhillipsA (1998) “Democracy and representation: or, why should it matter who our representatives are?” Chap. In: PhillipsA (ed), 10 in Feminism and Politics. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
42.
RahatGHazanRYKatzRS (2008) Democracy and political parties: on the uneasy relationships between participation, competition and representation. Party Politics14(6): 663–683.
43.
RayRGornickJCSchmittJ (2010) Who cares? Assessing generosity and gender equality in parental leave policy designs in 21 countries. Journal of European Social Policy20(3): 196–216.
44.
SchumacherGGigerN (2018) Do leadership-dominated parties change more?Journal of Elections, Public Opinion, and Parties28(3): 349–360.
45.
SchumacherGCatherineEde Vries, et al. (2013) Why do parties change position? Party organization and environmental incentives. The Journal of Politics75(2): 464–477.
46.
SundstromADaniel Stockemer (2022) Political party characteristics and women’s representation: the case of the European parliament. Representation58(1): 119–137.
47.
TavitsM (2011) Power within parties: the strength of the local party and MP independence in postcommunist Europe. American Journal of Political Science55(4): 923–936.
48.
TavitsM (2012a) Organizing for success: party organizational strength and electoral performance in postcommunist Europe. The Journal of Politics74(1): 83–97.
49.
TavitsM (2012b) Party organizational strength and party unity in post-communist Europe. European Political Science Review4(3): 409–431.
50.
TeorellJ (1999) A deliberative defence of intra-party democracy. Party Politics5(3): 363–382.
WeeksAC (2018) Why are gender quota laws adopted by men? The role of inter-and intraparty competition. Comparative Political Studies51(4): 1935–1973.
53.
WuttkeAJungherrASchoenH (2019). “More than opinion expression: secondary effects of intraparty referendums on party members.” Party Politics25(6): 817–827.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
