Does co-partisanship with mayors influence citizen trust in local governance institutions in new democracies? I answer this question through conducting a case study in Tunisia. I evaluate Arab Barometer (2018) survey data on trust in local governance institutions, and interview data with mayors, council members and civil society organizations (CSOs). The results indicate that Tunisians who support the same political party as their mayors tend to develop greater levels of trust in local governance institutions. Both quantitative evidence through a mediation model and qualitative evidence link a substantive portion of this relationship to the perceptions of institutional performance, such as their degrees of corruption, clientelism, inclusivity and efficiency. The findings identify the role and mechanism of co-partisanship in shaping trust in local governance institutions among the emerging democracies. This contributes to understanding the influence of parties in new democracies despite their weaknesses.
AyubiN (1995) Etatisme versus privatization: the changing economic role of the state in nine Arab countries. Economic Research Forum Working Papers9511.
2.
BahriCVlkelJC (2021) A Struggle for institutionalization: the Tunisian assemble des representants du peuple and the dominance of consensus-oriented politics. Middle East Law and Governance13(3): 272–293.
3.
BarnettABruceYGeorgeN (2013) Regulation, trust, and cronyism in Middle Eastern societies: The simple economics of wasta. The Journal of Socio-Economics44: 41–46.
4.
BarnettCShalabyM (2021) Success beyond gender quotas: gender, local Pplitics, and clientelism in Morocco. In: GLD University of Gothenburg Working Paper Series. 1–29.
5.
BaronRKennyD (1986) The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology51(6): 1173–1182.
6.
BensteadLAtkesonLRAdnan ShahidM (2019) Does wasta undermine support for democracy?: Corruption, clientelism, and attitudes toward political regimes. In: Corruption and Informal Practices in the Middle East and North Africa. London: Routledge, 77–99.
7.
BerenschotWMulderP (2019) Explaining regional variation in local governance: clientelism and state-dependency in Indonesia. World Development122: 233–244.
8.
BiancoWT (1994) Trust: Representatives and Constituents. Michigan, MI: University of Michigan Press.
9.
BielasiakJ (2005) Party competition in emerging democracies: representation and effectiveness in post-communism and beyond. Democratization12(3): 331–356.
10.
BlaisAGidengilEKilibardaA (2017) Partisanship, information, and perceptions of government corruption. International Journal of Public Opinion Research29(1): 95–110.
11.
BoettkePJCoyneCJLeesonPT (2011) Quasimarket failure. Public Choice149(1): 209–224.
12.
BornschierS (2009) Cleavage politics in old and new democracies. Living Reviews in Democracy1. online.
13.
BoubekeurA (2018) Islamists, secularists and old regime elites in Tunisia: Bargained competition. In: Dynamics of Transformation, Elite Change and New Social Mobilization. London: Routledge, 107–127.
14.
BrixiHLustEWoolcockM (2015) Trust, Voice, and Incentives: Learning from Local Success Stories in Service Delivery in the Middle East and North Africa. Washington, DC: The World Bank.
15.
Brody-BarreAG (2013) The impact of political parties and coalition building on Tunisia’s democratic future. The Journal of North African Studies18(2): 211–230.
16.
BrumbergD (2021) Contending Legaciess: Tunisia and the U.S. as unexceptionally exceptional case. Revenue Tunisienne de Science Politique5: 159–189.
17.
BuehlerM (2016) Do you have connections at the courthouse? An original survey on informal influence and judicial rulings in Morocco. Political Research Quarterly69(4): 760–772.
18.
CammettMLuongPJ (2014) Is there an Islamist Political Advantage?Annual Review of Political Science17: 187–206.
19.
ChoWBrattonM (2006) Electoral institutions, partisan status, and political support in Lesotho. Electoral Studies25(4): 731–750.
20.
CiftciSBernickEM (2015) Utilitarian and modern: Clientelism, citizen empowerment, and civic engagement in the Arab world. Democratization22(7): 1161–1182.
21.
ClarkJA (2018) Local Politics in Jordan and Morocco: Strategies of Centralization and Decentralization. New York: Columbia University Press.
22.
ClarkJADalmassoELustE, (2019) Not the only game in towns: Explaining Changes in Municipal Councils in Post-revolutionary Tunisia. Democratization26(8): 1362–1381.
23.
CorstangeD (2018) Clientelism in competitive and uncompetitive elections. Comparative Political Studies51(1): 76–104.
24.
De MiguelCJamalAATesslerM (2015) Elections in the Arab world: why do citizens turn out?Comparative Political Studies48(11): 1355–1388.
25.
DihstelhoffJ (2018) Tunisian politics between crisis and normalization. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace 1.
26.
ElviraLRSchwarzCWeipert-FennerI (2018) Clientelism and Patronage in the Middle East and North Africa. Networks of Dependency. London; New York: Routledge.
HoDEImaiKKingG, et al. (2007) Matching as nonparametric preprocessing for reducing model dependence in parametric causal inference. Political Analysis15(3): 199–236.
34.
HoweP (2017) Eroding norms and democratic deconsolidation. Journal of Democracy28(4): 15–29.
35.
IacusSMKingGPorroG (2012) Causal inference without balance checking: Coarsened exact matching. Political Analysis20: 1–24.
36.
InnesA (2002) Party Competition in Postcommunist Europe: The Great Electoral Lottery. Comparative Politics35: 85–104.
37.
JacobMSSchenkeG (2020) Partisanship and Institutional Trust in Mongolia. Democratization274: 605–623.
38.
JamalAmaney, et al. (2018) Arab-Barometer Wave V: Public Opinion Survey Conducted in Tunisia. Arab Barometer.
39.
KatzRSMairP (1995) Changing models of party organization and party democracy: the emergence of the cartel party. Party Politics1(1): 5–28.
KornbergAClarkeHD (1994) Beliefs about democracy and satisfaction with democratic government: the Canadian case. Political Research Quarterly47(3): 537–563.
42.
KrnkeMJ LockwoodSMattesR (2020) Party footprints in Africa: measuring local party presence across the continent. Party Politics28: 13540688211008352.
43.
LacknerH (2016) Wasta: is it such a bad thing? An anthropological perspective. In: The Political Economy of Wasta: Use and Abuse of Social Capital Networking. Cham: Springer, 35.
44.
LambertRDCurtisJEBrownSD, et al. (1986) Effects of identification with governing parties on feelings of political efficacy and trust. Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue canadienne de science politique19(4): 705–728.
45.
LecaJSchemeilY (1983) Clientlisme et patrimonialisme dans le monde arabe. International Political Science Review4(4): 455–494.
46.
LoxtonJ (2015) Authoritarian successor parties. Journal of Democracy26(3): 157–170.
47.
LustE (2009) Democratization by elections? Competitive clientelism in the middle east. Journal of Democracy20(3): 122–135.
48.
ManzettiLWilsonCJ (2007) Why do corrupt governments maintain public support?Comparative Political Studies40(8): 952–970.
49.
MarzoukiN (2015) Tunisia’s rotten compromise. In: Middle East Report.
50.
McCarthyR (2021). “Political Mistrust and the Islamist Impasse”. In: MarkLynch (ed) MENA Politics Newslestter (Fall 2021). APSA MENA Section, 57–59.
51.
MeroneF (2015) Enduring class struggle in Tunisia: the fight for identity beyond political Islam. British Journal of Middle Eastern Studies42(1): 74–87.
52.
MeroneF (2017) Tunisian Islamism beyond Democratization. PhD thesis. Ghent:Ghent University.
53.
MeroneFDe FacciD (2015) The new islamic middle class and the struggle for hegemony in Tunisia. Afriche e Orienti17(1–2): 56–69.
54.
MorrisSDKlesnerJL (2010) Corruption and trust: theoretical considerations and evidence from Mexico. Comparative Political Studies43(10): 1258–1285.
55.
M’radH (2021) Theorie de la decision politique de Carl Schmitt et transition democratique tunisienne. Revenue Tunisienne de Science Politique5: 103–158.
56.
Perspectives (2018). Tunisian Democracy Stands at the Precipice.
57.
RonigerL (2004) Political clientelism, democracy, and market economy. Comparative Politics36: 353–375.
58.
StoyanATNiedzwieckiSMorganJ, et al. (2016) Trust in Government Institutions: The Effects of Performance and Participation in the Dominican Republic and Haiti. International Political Science Review37(1): 18–35.
59.
TeehankeeJC (2012) Clientelism and party politics in the Philippines. In: Party Politics in Southeast Asia. London: Routledge, 204–232.
60.
TetiAAbbottPCavatortaF, (2019) Beyond elections: perceptions of democracy in four arab countries. Democratization26(4): 645–665.
61.
TingleyDTeppeiYKentaroH, et al. (2014) Mediation: R Package for Causal Mediation Analysis. UCLA Statistics/American Statistical Association.
62.
VolpiFMeroneFLoschiC, (2016) Local (R) evolutions in Tunisia, 2011–2014: Reconstructing municipal political authority. The Middle East Journal70(3): 365–381.
63.
WangF (1994) The political economy of authoritarian clientelism in Taiwan. Democracy, Clientelism, and Civil Society36: 181–206.
64.
WolfA (2017) Political Islam in Tunisia: The History of Ennahda. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
YasunS (2021) Bureaucrat-local politician relations and hierarchical local governance in emerging democracies: a case study of Tunisia. The Journal of the Middle East and Africa13: 1–26.
67.
ZafiroviJMatijeviBFilipoviB (2021) Institutional trust, political participation, and corruption: A European comparative perspective. Sociologija63(2): 336–354.
68.
ZedermanM (2016) The hegemonic bourguibist discourse on modernity in post-revolutionary Tunisia. Middle East Law and Governance8(2): 179–200.
69.
ZielinskiJ (2002) Translating social cleavages into party systems: the significance of new democracies. World Politics54: 184–211.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
