The degree to which party systems are ideologically and programmatically structured is central to democracy. This article analyzes differences in the extent and nature of programmatic structuration in Latin America and Europe, using a new original data source, the Chapel Hill Expert Survey-Latin America (CHES-LA), in combination with the long-standing CHES-Europe. First, we demonstrate the reliability of CHES-LA in relation to CHES-Europe, and substantiate its validity by comparing it to other expert, elite and party manifesto surveys in Latin America. Using confirmatory factor analysis, we then show that while party system structuration in Latin America is somewhat lower than in Europe, it is also of a decisively different nature. In Latin America economic and socio-cultural policy positions are largely captured in a single overlapping dimension; in Europe, by contrast, competition occurs overwhelmingly along two dimensions, each with distinct clusters of policy positions.
Abou-ChadiTBreyerMGesslerT (2021) The (re)politicisation of gender in Western Europe. European Journal of Politics and Gender4(2): 311–314.
2.
AlcántaraM (ed.) (2018) Proyecto Elites Latinoamericanas (PELA-USAL). Salamanca, Spain: Universidad de Salamanca.
3.
AlmeidaPSosaECordero UlateA, et al. (2021) Protest waves and social movement fields: the micro foundations of campaigning for subaltern political parties. Social Problems68(4): 831–851.
4.
AresCVolkensA (2017) Representación, estructura de la competencia e ideología de los partidos políticos. Revista Latinoamericana de Política Comparada13(July): 9–28.
5.
BakkerRJollySPolkJ (2012) Complexity in the European party space: Exploring dimensionality with experts. European Union Politics13(2): 219–245.
6.
BenoitKLaverM (2006) Party Policy in Modern Democracies. London, UK: Routledge.
7.
BoasTSmithA E (2015) Religion and the Latin American voter. In: CarlinRSingerEZechmeisterEJ (eds.), The Latin American Voter: Pursuing Representation and Accountability in Challenging Contexts. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
8.
BornschierS (2010) Cleavage Politics and the Populist Right: The New Cultural Conflict in Western Europe. Philadelphia, Asia: Temple University Press.
9.
EckerAJennyMMüllerMC, et al. (2021) How and why party position estimates from manifestos, expert, and party elite survey diverge. A comparative analysis of the ‘left-right’ and the ‘European integration’ dimensions. Party Politics. DOI: 10.1177/1354068821990298.
10.
FriedmanE (ed.), (2019) Seeking Rights from the Left: Gender, Sexuality, and the Latin American Pink Tide. Durham, England: Duke University Press.
11.
GramachoWLlamazaresI (2007) Ideología y preferencias de intervención económica estatal entre los diputados latinoamericanos. Barcelona, Spain: Fundación CIDOB, Documentos CIDOB. América Latina, 18.
12.
HartlynJStoyanAT (2020) Constitutions in Latin American Politics. Oxford, UK: Oxford Research Encyclopedia on Politics. DOI: 10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.1685.
13.
HäusermannSKriesiH (2015) What do voters want? dimensions and configurations in individual-level preferences and party choice. In: BeramendiPHäusermannSKitscheltH, et al. (eds.), The Politics of Advanced Capitalism. Cambridge, CA: Cambridge University Press, pp. 202–230.
14.
HoogheLMarksG (2018) Cleavage theory meets Europe's crises: Lipset, Rokkan, and the transnational cleavage. Journal of European Public Policy25(1): 109–135.
15.
HoogheLMarksG (2021 December) The social roots of the transnational cleavage: sex, education, and occupation. In Paper Presented at a Conference on ‘Theories of the Contemporary Divide. FL, Italy: EUI, 15–17.
16.
HoogheLMarksGWilsonCJ (2002) Does left/right structure party positions on European integration?Comparative Political Studies35(8): 965–989.
17.
JollySBakkerRHoogheL, et al. (2022) Chapel Hill Expert Survey trend file, 1999-2019. Electoral Studies75: 102420.
18.
KitscheltHHawkinsKALunaJP, et al. (2010) Latin American Party Systems. Cambridge, CA: Cambridge University Press.
19.
KitscheltHP (1988) Left-libertarian parties: explaining innovation in competitive party systems. World Politics40(2): 194–234.
20.
KlineRB (2010) Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling. 3rd ed.. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
21.
KriesiHGrandeELachatR, et al. (2008) West European Politics in the Age of Globalization. Cambridge, CA: Cambridge University Press.
22.
LevitskySLoxtonJVan DykeB (2016) Introduction. In: LevitskySLoxtonJVan DykeB, et al. (eds), Challenges of Party-Building in Latin America. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–48.
23.
LupuN (2011) Party Brands in Crisis. Cambridge, CA: Cambridge University Press.
24.
MainwaringSBejaranoAMLeongómexEP (2006) The crisis of democratic representation in the andes. In: MainwaringSBejaranoAMPizarro LeongómezE (eds.), The Crisis of Democratic Representation in the Andes. Cambridge, CA: Stanford University Press, pp. 1–44.
25.
MainwaringS (ed.), (2018) Party Systems in Latin America: Institutionalization, Decay, and Collapse. Cambridge, CA: Cambridge University Press.
26.
Mantilla BacaS (ed), (2020) Los partidos políticos en América Latina: ideología y estructura de la competencia. Quito, Equador: CELAEP & Fundación Hanns Seidel.
27.
MarksGHoogheLSteenbergenMR, et al. (2007) Crossvalidating data on party positioning on European integration. Electoral Studies26(1): 23–38.
28.
MorganJHinojosaM (2018) Women in political parties: Seen but not heard. In: Schwindt-BayerL (ed.), Gender and Representation in Latin America. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, pp. 74–98.
29.
MorganJ (2011) Bankrupt Representation and Party System Collapse. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.
30.
MuddeC (2007) Populist Radical Right Parties in Europe. Cambridge, CA: Cambridge University Press.
PowerTZuccoJr C (2009) Estimating ideology of Brazilian legislative parties, 1990-2005: a research communication. Latin American Research Review44(1): 218–246.
33.
RobertsKM (2013) Market reform, programmatic (de)alignment, and party system stability in Latin America. Comparative Political Studies46(11): 1422–1452.
34.
RobertsKMWibbelsE (1999) Party systems and electoral volatility in Latin America: a test of economic, institutional, and structural explanations. American Political Science Review93(3): 575–590.
35.
RovnyJPolkJ (2019) New wine in old bottles: Explaining the dimensional structure of European party systems. Party Politics25(1): 12–24.
36.
SaieghSM (2009) Recovering a basic space from elite surveys: Evidence from Latin America. Legislative Studies Quarterly34(1): 117–145.
37.
SingerMM (2011) Who Says "It's the Economy"? Cross-National and Cross-Individual Variation in the Salience of Economic Performance. Comparative Political Studies44(3): 284–312.
38.
SingerM (2016) Elite Polarization and the Electoral Impact of Left-Right Placements: Evidence from Latin America, 1995-2009. Latin American Research Review51(2): 174–194.
39.
SmithAE (2019) Religion and Brazilian Democracy: Mobilizing the People of God. Cambridge, CA: Cambridge University Press.
40.
SteenbergenMRMarksG (2007) Evaluating expert judgments. European Journal of Political Research46(3): 347–366.
41.
StubagerR (2009) Education-based group identity and consciousness in the authoritarian-libertarian value conflict. European Journal of Political Research48(2): 204–233.
42.
Wickham-CrowleyTPEcksteinSE (2015) “There and back again”: Latin American social movements and reasserting the powers of structural theories. In: AlmeidaPCordero UlateA (eds). Handbook of Social Movements across Latin America. New York, NY: Springer, 25–42.
43.
WiesehomeierNBenoitK (2009) Presidents, parties, and policy competition. The Journal of Politics71(4): 1435–1447.
44.
WiesehomeierNDoyleD (2012) Attitudes, ideological associations and the left-right divide in Latin America. Journal of Politics in Latin America4(1): 3–33.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
