What happens to the anti-establishment sentiments of pro-incumbent voters for a populist force that is in government and thus controls the political system? This article examines this question utilizing the case of Turkey, a country in which a populist force has been in power for more than a decade. By analyzing populist attitudes among a nationally representative sample, we demonstrate that while the voters of the incumbent populist party (AKP) are less likely, compared to everyone else, to hold populist sentiments, the same voters are also substantially more likely to endorse conspiracy theories that center on malign foreign powers. This finding is relevant beyond Turkey, because it demonstrates that populist forces might be able to maintain popular support and thus stay in power for a long stretch of time by employing government propaganda to fuel an antagonism against conspiratorial foreign and global forces.
AkkermanAMuddeCZasloveA (2014) How populist are the people? Measuring populist attitudes in voters. Comparative Political Studie47(9): 1324–1353.
2.
AkkermanAZasloveASpruytB (2017) “We the people” or “we the peoples”? A comparison of support for the populist radical right and populist radical left in the Netherlands. Swiss Political Science Review23(4): 377–403.
3.
AlbertazziDMcDonnellD (2008) Introduction: the sceptre and the spectre. In: Twenty-First Century Populism. London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 1–11.
4.
Aydın-DüzgitS (2016) De-Europeanisation through discourse: a critical discourse analysis of AKP’s election speeches. South European Society and Politics21(1): 45–58.
5.
Aydın-DüzgitSBaltaE (2018) When elites polarize over polarization: framing the polarization debate in Turkey. New Perspectives on Turkey59: 109–133.
6.
AytaçSEÖnişZ (2014) Varieties of populism in a changing global context: the divergent paths of Erdoğan and Kirchnerismo. Comparative Politics47(1): 41–59.
7.
AytaçSEÇarkoğluAElçiE (2021) Partisanship, elite messages, and support for populism in power. European Political Science Review13: 23–39.
8.
BergmannE (2018) Conspiracy & Populism: The Politics of Misinformation. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
9.
BergmannEButterM (2020) Populism and conspiracy theories. In: ButterMKnightP (eds) Routledge Handbook of Conspiracy Theories. London: Routledge.
10.
BowlerSDenemarkDDonovanT, et al. (2017) Right-wing populist party supporters: dissatisfied but not direct democrats. European Journal of Political Research56(1): 70–91.
11.
BrothertonRFrenchCCPickeringAD (2013) Measuring belief in conspiracy theories: the generic conspiracist beliefs scale. Frontiers in Psycholog4: 279.
12.
ÇarkoğluAKalaycıoğluE (2009) The Rising Tide of Conservatism. London: Palgrave.
13.
CastaldoA (2018) Populism and competitive authoritarianism in Turkey. Southeast European and Black Sea Studies18(4): 467–487.
14.
Castanho SilvaBVegettiFLittvayL (2017) The elite is up to something: exploring the relation between populism and belief in conspiracy theories. Swiss Political Science Review23(4): 423–443.
15.
ÇelikABBaltaE (2018) Explaining the micro dynamics of the populist cleavage in the “new Turkey.” Mediterranean Politics25: 160–181.
16.
De MedeirosJ (2018) Conspiracy Theory in Turkey: Politics and Protest in the Age of “Post-Truth.” London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
17.
DouglasKMUscinskiJESuttonRM, et al. (2019) Understanding conspiracy theories. Political Psychology40(S1): 3–35.
18.
EdelsonJAlduncinAKrewsonC, et al. (2017) The effect of conspiratorial thinking and motivated reasoning on belief in election fraud. Political Research Quarterly70(4): 933–946.
19.
ElchardusMSpruytB (2016) Populism, persistent republicanism and declinism: an empirical analysis of populism as a thin ideology. Government and Opposition51(1): 111–133.
20.
EsenBGumuscuS (2016) Rising competitive authoritarianism in Turkey. Third World Quarterly37(9): 1581–1606.
21.
FensterM (1999) Conspiracy Theories: Secrecy and Power in American Culture. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
22.
GoertzelT (1994) Belief in conspiracy theories. Political Psychology15: 731–742.
23.
GuilerK (2016) Towards Erdogan and the East: conspiracies and public perception in post-coup Turkey. In: POMEPS Studies 22: Contemporary Turkish Politics. Houston, TX: Baker Institute for Public Policy, p. 28.
24.
GürpınarD (2019) Conspiracy Theories in Turkey: Conspiracy Nation. London: Routledge.
25.
HawkinsKA (2009) Is Chávez populist? Measuring populist discourse in comparative perspective. Comparative Political Studies42(8): 1040–1067.
26.
HawkinsKARoviraKaltwasser C (2017) What the (ideational) study of populism can teach us, and what it can’t. Swiss Political Science Review23(4): 526–542.
27.
HawkinsKARoviraKaltwasser CAndreadisI (2018) The activation of populist attitudes. Government and Opposition55: 283–307.
28.
HawkinsKARidingSMuddeC (2012) Measuring Populist Attitudes. Committee on Concepts and Methods Working Paper Series.
29.
HawkinsKARyanECLeventeL, et al. (eds) (2019) The Ideational Approach to Populism: Concept, Theory, and Analysis. Abingdon/New York: Routledge.
30.
HerzogC (2014) Small and large scale conspiracy theories and their problems: an example from Turkey. In: ButterMReinkowskiM (eds) Conspiracy Theories in the United States and the Middle East: A Comparative Approach. Berlin: de Gruyter, pp. 194–211.
31.
IvaldiGLanzoneMEWoodsD (2017) Varieties of populism across a left-right spectrum: the case of the Front National, the Northern League, Podemos and Five Star Movement. Swiss Political Science Review23(4): 354–376.
32.
IvarsflatenE (2008) What unites right-wing populists in Western Europe? Re-examining grievance mobilization models in seven successful cases. Comparative Political Studies41(1): 3–23.
33.
KaraosmanoğluK (forthcoming) The discourse of üst akıl: a search for hegemony in the Turkish media. Southeast European and Black Sea Studies. DOI: 10.1080/14683857.2021.1872233
34.
KONDA (2016) KONDA Barometresi: Kitle İletişim Araçları ve Sosyal Medya Etkisi. April Survey Report.
35.
LockeS (2009) Conspiracy culture, blame culture, and rationalisation. The Sociological Review57(4): 567–585.
36.
McCloskyHChongD (1985) Similarities and differences between left-wing and right-wing radicals. British Journal of Political Science15(3): 329–363.
37.
MeléndezCRovira KaltwasserC (2019) Political identities: the missing link in the study of populism. Party Politics25(4): 1–14.
38.
MillerJMSaundersKLFarhartCE (2016) Conspiracy endorsement as motivated reasoning: the moderating roles of political knowledge and trust. American Journal of Political Science60(4): 824–844.
39.
MuddeC (2004) The populist zeitgeist. Government and Opposition39(4): 541–563.
40.
MuddeCRoviraKaltwasser C (eds) (2012) Populism in Europe and the Americas: Threat or Corrective for Democracy?. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
41.
MuddeCRoviraKaltwasser C (2017) Populism: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
42.
MuddeCRoviraKaltwasser C (2018) Studying populism in comparative perspective: reflections on the contemporary and future research agenda. Comparative Political Studies51(13): 1667–1693.
43.
ÖzpekBBTanriverdi YaşarN (2018) Populism and foreign policy in Turkey under the AKP rule. Turkish Studies19(2): 198–216.
44.
RicoGAnduizaE (2019) Economic correlates of populist attitudes: an analysis of nine European countries in the aftermath of the great recession. Acta Politica54(3): 371–397.
45.
RicoGGuinjoanMAnduizaE (2017) The emotional underpinnings of populism: how anger and fear affect populist attitudes. Swiss Political Science Review23(4): 444–461.
46.
RooduijnMPauwelsT (2011) Measuring populism: comparing two methods of content analysis. West European Politics34(6): 1272–1283.
47.
RosenblumNLMuirheadR (2019) A Lot of People are Saying: The New Conspiracism and the Assault on Democracy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
48.
Rovira KaltwasserC (2021) Bringing political psychology into the study of populism. Philosophical Transactions B. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2020.0148
49.
Rovira KaltwasserCTaggartP (2016) Dealing with populists in government: a framework for analysis. Democratization23(2): 201–220.
50.
Rovira KaltwasserCVan HauwaertSM (2020) The populist citizen: empirical evidence from Europe and Latin America. European Political Science Review12(1): 1–18.
51.
SağlamE (2020) What to do with conspiracy theories? Insights from contemporary Turkey. Anthropology Today36(5): 18–21.
52.
SchulzAMüllerPSchemerC, et al. (2017) Measuring populist attitudes on three dimensions. International Journal of Public Opinion Research30(2): 316–326.
53.
SelçukO (2016) Strong presidents and weak institutions: populism in Turkey, Venezuela and Ecuador. Southeast European and Black Sea Studies16(4): 571–589.
54.
SilvaBC (2019) “He’s not one of them!” Antiestablishment supporters of populist governments in Bolivia and Ecuador. The Journal of Politics81(3): 1085–1089.
55.
SomerMMcCoyJ (2018) Déjà vu? Polarization and endangered democracies in the 21st century. American Behavioral Scientist62(1): 1–13.
56.
SpruytBKeppensGVan DroogenbroeckF (2016) Who supports populism and what attracts people to it?Political Research Quarterly69(2): 335–346.
57.
SuttonRMDouglasKM (2014) Examining the monological nature of conspiracy theories. In: van ProoijenJWvan LangePA (eds) Power Politics Paranoia: Why People Are Suspicious Their Lead. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 254–272.
58.
SwamiVChamorro-PremuzicTFurnhamA (2010) Unanswered questions: a preliminary investigation of personality and individual difference predictors of 9/11 conspiracist beliefs. Applied Cognitive Psychology24: 749–761.
59.
TaşH (2015) Turkey–from tutelary to delegative democracy. Third World Quarterly36(4): 776–791.
60.
TsatsanisEAndreadisITeperoglouE (2018) Populism from below: socio-economic and ideological correlates of mass attitudes in Greece. South European Society and Politics23(4): 429–450.
61.
TürkHB (2018) “Populism as a medium of mass mobilization”: the case of Recep Tayyip Erdoğan. International Area Studies Review21(2): 150–168.
62.
UscinskiJEKlofstadCAtkinsonMD (2016) What drives conspiratorial beliefs? The role of informational cues and predispositions. Political Research Quarterly69(1): 57–71.
63.
UscinskiJEOlivellaS (2017) The conditional effect of conspiracy thinking on attitudes toward climate change. Research & Politics4(4): 1–9.
64.
Van HauwaertSMVan KesselS (2018) Beyond protest and discontent: a cross-national analysis of the effect of populist attitudes and issue positions on populist party support. European Journal of Political Research57(1): 68–92.
65.
Van ProoijenJ-W (2017) Why education predicts decreased belief in conspiracy theories. Applied Cognitive Psychology31: 50–58.
66.
van ProoijenJWDouglasKM (2018) Belief in conspiracy theories: basic principles of an emerging research domain. European Journal of Social Psychology48(7): 897–908.
67.
Van ProoijenJ-WKrouwelAPMPolletT (2015) Political extremism predicts belief in conspiracy theories. Social Psychological and Personality Science6: 570–578.
68.
YabanciB (2016) Populism as the problem child of democracy: the AKP’s enduring appeal and the use of meso-level actors. Southeast European and Black Sea Studies16(4): 591–617.
69.
YağcıA (2009) Packaging Neoliberalism: Neopopulism and the Case of Justice and Development Party. Unpublished Master’s Thesis. Bogaziçi University, Istanbul.
70.
YıldırımKBaruhLÇarkoğluA (forthcoming) Dynamics of campaign reporting and press-party parallelism: rise of competitive authoritarianism and the media system in Turkey. Political Communication. DOI: 10.1080/10584609.2020.1765913
71.
ZallerJR (1992) The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
