Why do parties form pre-electoral coalitions (PECs) in executive elections? The party of the executive candidate may welcome coalition partners because of the votes that they can deliver. However, PECs often include parties that bring few votes to the coalition. I theorize that parties with a candidate in the executive election welcome small parties because of the campaign resources that they bring to the PEC. I test this argument using data from mayoral elections in Brazil, where parties do not control access to advertisement on radio/TV. The results indicate that campaign resources increase the likelihood of being admitted to a PEC when the party without an executive candidate has few votes to offer.
AlbalaA (2016) Presidencialismo y Coaliciones de Gobierno En América Latina: Un Análisis Del Papel de Las Instituciones. Revista de ciencia política (Santiago)36: 459–479.
2.
ArraesRAmorim NetoOSimonassiA (2017) Despesas de campanha e sucesso eleitoral nos pleitos legislativos brasileiros. Dados60(4): 1059–1093.
3.
BirchS (2009) Full Participation: A Comparative Study of Compulsory Voting. Tokyo, Japan; New York: United Nations University Press.
4.
BorbaF (2014) Tempo de televisão e voto nas eleições brasileiras. Paper presented at the IX Brazilian Political Science Association Meeting. Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
5.
BorbaFCerviEU (2017) Relação entre propaganda, dinheiro e avaliação de governo no desempenho de candidatos em eleições majoritárias no Brasil. Opinião Pública23(3): 754–785.
6.
BorgesATurgeonM (2019) Presidential coattails in coalitional presidentialism. Party Politics25: 192–202.
7.
BormannN-CGolderM (2013) Democratic electoral systems around the world, 1946-2011. Electoral Studies32: 360–369.
8.
CalvoEGuarnieriFLimongiF (2015) Why coalitions? Party system fragmentation, small party bias, and preferential vote in Brazil. Electoral Studies39: 219–229.
9.
CarreirãoYSNascimentoFP (2010) As coligações nas eleições para os cargos de governador, senador, deputado federal e deputado estadual no Brasil (1986/2006). Revista Brasileira de Ciência Política4: 75–104.
10.
CarrollR (2007) The Electoral Origins of Governing Coalitions. San Diego, CA: Dissertation Ph.D. UCSD.
11.
CartyRKEaglesM (1999) Do local campaigns matter? Campaign spending, the local canvass and party support in Canada. Electoral Studies18(1): 69–87.
12.
ChasquettiD (2008) Democracia, presidencialismo y partidos políticos en América Latina: evaluando la “difícil combinación.” Montevideo, Uruguay: Instituto de Ciencia Política, Facultad de Ciencias Sociales, Universidad de la República.
13.
CoxGW (1997) Making Votes Count: Strategic Coordination in the World’s Electoral Systems. Cambridge, NY: Cambridge University Press.
14.
CunhaPSDavidianAFreitasA, et al. (2015) Reforma política no Brasil: indagações sobre o impacto no sistema partidário e na representação. Opinião Pública21(1): 1–32.
15.
DantasHPraçaS (2004) Os pequenos partidos nas coligações eleitorais para prefeituras em 2000. Leviathan1: 181–200.
16.
DuvergerM (1954) Political Parties: Their Organisation and Activity in the Modern State. Hoboken, NJ: Methuen; Wiley.
17.
FisherJFieldhouseEJohnstonR, et al. (2016) Is all campaigning equally positive? The impact of district level campaigning on voter turnout at the 2010 British general election. Party Politics22: 215–226.
18.
FranzMMRidoutTN (2010) Political advertising and persuasion in the 2004 and 2008 presidential elections. American Politics Research38: 303–329.
19.
FreudenreichJ (2016) The formation of cabinet coalitions in presidential systems. Latin American Politics and Society58(4): 80–102.
20.
GolderM (2006a) Presidential coattails and legislative fragmentation. American Journal of Political Science50(1): 34–48.
21.
GolderSN (2005) Pre-electoral coalitions in comparative perspective: a test of existing hypotheses. Electoral Studies24: 643–663.
22.
GolderSN (2006b) The Logic of Pre-Electoral Coalition Formation. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press.
23.
GolderSN (2006c) Pre-electoral coalition formation in parliamentary democracies. British Journal of Political Science36: 193–212.
24.
GóreckiMAKukołowiczP (2018) Electoral formula, legal threshold and the number of parties: a natural experiment. Party Politics24: 617–628.
25.
HickenAStollH (2011) Presidents and parties: how presidential elections shape coordination in legislative elections. Comparative Political Studies44: 854–883.
26.
HolbrookTMMcClurgSD (2005) The mobilization of core supporters: campaigns, turnout, and electoral composition in United States presidential elections. American Journal of Political Science49(4): 689–703.
27.
IbenskasR (2016) Understanding pre-electoral coalitions in Central and Eastern Europe. British Journal of Political Science46: 743–761.
JonesM (2018) Presidential and Legislative Elections. In: ShugartMSPekkanenRHerronES (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Electoral Systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 283–302.
30.
KaidLLHoltz-BachaC (2006) Television advertising and democratic systems around the world. In: Holtz-BachaCKaidLL (eds) The SAGE Handbook of Political Advertising. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 445–458.
31.
KellamM (2017) Why pre-electoral coalitions in presidential systems?British Journal of Political Science47: 391–411.
32.
LucardiA (2017) The effect of district magnitude on electoral outcomes: evidence from two natural experiments in Argentina. British Journal of Political Science49: 1–21.
33.
MachadoA (2009) Minimum winning electoral coalitions under presidentialism: reality or fiction? the case of Brazil. Latin American Politics and Society51: 87–110.
34.
MartinLWStevensonRT (2001) Government formation in parliamentary democracies. American Journal of Political Science45(1): 33–50.
35.
MiguelLFFerreira Bispo de AssisPP (2016) Coligações eleitorais e fragmentação das bancadas parlamentares no Brasil: simulações a partir das eleições de 2014. Revista de Sociologia e Política24(60): 29–46.
36.
MirandaGLde (2013) Coligações eleitorais: tendências e racionalidades nas eleições federais e majoritárias estaduais (1990-2010). Revista de Sociologia e Política21(47): 69–90.
37.
NicolauJ (2008) The presidential and congressional elections in Brazil, October 2006. Electoral Studies27: 170–175.
38.
PanagopoulosCGreenDP (2011) Spanish-language radio advertisements and latino voter turnout in the 2006 congressional elections: field experimental evidence. Political Research Quarterly64: 588–599.
39.
RivarolaDRMoscovichNM (2018) Representación Visual y Simbólica de La Militancia En Las Campañas Electorales de Cristina F. de Kirchner (2007 y 2011) y Dilma Rousseff (2010 y 2014). Opinião Pública24: 144–177.
40.
SamuelsD (2003) Ambition, Federalism, and Legislative Politics in Brazil. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
41.
SamuelsDJ (2000) The gubernatorial coattails effect: federalism and congressional elections in Brazil. The Journal of Politics62(1): 240–253.
42.
SandesFVEVde (2015) Alianças partidárias nos estados brasileiros: das coligações às coalizões de governo. Brazil: Ph.D. Dissertation, UNICAMP.
43.
SchmittRCarneiroLPKuschnirK (1999) Estratégias de Campanha No Horário Gratuito de Propaganda Eleitoral Em Eleiçōes Proporcionais. Dados42(2): 277–301.
44.
SilveiraDBernardoSMelloD, et al. (2011) Campaign advertising and election outcomes: quasi-natural experiment evidence from gubernatorial elections in Brazil. The Review of Economic Studies78: 590–612.
45.
SpeckBWCerviEU (2016) Dinheiro, tempo e memória eleitoral: os mecanismos que levam ao voto nas eleições para prefeito em 2012. Dados59(1): 53–90.
46.
SpoonJ-JGómezAP (2017) Unusual Bedfellows? PRI-PVEM Electoral Alliances in Mexican Legislative Elections. Journal of Politics in Latin America9: 63–92.
47.
SpoonJ-JWestKJ (2015) Alone or together? How institutions affect party entry in presidential elections in Europe and South America. Party Politics21: 393–403.
48.
StratmannT (2009) How prices matter in politics: the returns to campaign advertising. Public Choice140: 357–377.
WarwickPV (1996) Coalition government membership in west European parliamentary democracies. British Journal of Political Science26: 471–499.
51.
WestKJSpoonJ-J (2017) Coordination and presidential coattails: do parties’ presidential entry strategies affect legislative vote share?Party Politics23: 578–588.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
