Changes in electoral markets in the late 20th century have forced political parties to adapt. Having lost much support and facing growing disaffection, parties often resorted to organizational structure reforms as means to reengage with a dealigned electorate. This article explores the impact of two changes in party organization—democratization of leadership selection procedures and increasing leadership power—on the extent to which leaders have an effect on voting behavior. In doing so, it analyzes the understudied interconnection between the electoral and the party faces of the presidentialization of politics thesis. The results provide mixed evidence regarding the relationship between both dimensions of presidentialization: more leadership power boosts leader effects, but only non-divisive direct leadership elections favor leader effects. This is a comparative study on Western democracies, combining individual-level data from the Comparative of Study of Electoral Systems with contextual data from the Political Party Database Project.
AardalBBinderT (2011) Leader effects and party characteristics. In: AartsKBlaisASchmittH (eds), Political Leaders and Democratic Elections. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 108–126.
2.
AartsKBlaisASchmittH (eds) (2011) Political Leaders and Democratic Elections. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
3.
BardiLBartoliniSTrechselAH (2014) Responsive and responsible? The role of parties in twenty-first century politics. West European Politics37(2): 235–252.
4.
BarisioneM (2009) So, what difference do leaders make? Candidates’ images and the “conditionality” of leader effects on voting. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties19(4): 473–500.
5.
BarneaSRahatG (2007) Reforming candidate selection methods: a three-level approach. Party Politics13(3): 375–394.
6.
BartoliniSMairP (2001) Challenges to contemporary political parties. In: DiamondLGuntherR (eds) Political Parties and Democracy. Baltimore; London: The Johns Hopkins University Press, pp. 327–343.
7.
BernsteinR (1977) Divisive primaries do hurt: U.S. Senate Races, 1956–1972. American Political Science Review71(2): 540–545.
8.
CrossWPiletJB (2014) The selection of party leaders in contemporary parliamentary democracies. In: PiletJCrossW (eds) The Selection of Political Party Leaders in Contemporary Parliamentary Democracies: A Comparative Study. New York: Routledge, pp. 1–11.
9.
CrossWPKatzRSPruysersS (2018) The Personalization of Democratic Politics and the Challenge for Political Parties. Colchester: ECPR Press/Rowman & Littlefield International.
10.
CurticeJLisiM (2014) The Impact of Leaders in Parliamentary and Presidential Regimes. In: LoboMCCurticeJ (eds) Personality Politics? The Role of Leader Evaluations in Democratic Elections. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 63–84.
11.
DaltonRJWattenbergMP (2000) Parties Without Partisans: Political Change in Advanced Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
12.
De LucaMVenturinoF (2015) Democratising candidate selection in Italy and France. In: SandriGSeddoneAVenturinoF (eds) Party Primaries in Comparative Perspective. Farnham: Ashgate, pp. 129–144.
13.
Ferreira da SilvaF (2018) Fostering turnout?: Assessing party leaders’ capacity to mobilize voters. Electoral Studies56: 61–79.
14.
GarziaD (2014) Personalization of Politics and Electoral Change. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
15.
GarziaDViottiF (2012) Party identification, leader effects and vote choice in Italy, 1990-2008. World Political Science Review8(1): 1–23.
16.
GarziaDFerreira da SilvaFDe AngelisA (2018) Partisan Dealignment and the Personalization of Politics in West European Parliamentary Democracies, 1961-2016. UC Irvine: Centre for the Study of Democracy. Available at: https://escholarship.org/uc/item/8r7500zq (accessed 8 March 2019).
17.
GidengilE (2011) Voter characteristics and leader effects. In: AartsKBlaisASchmittH (eds) Political Leaders and Democratic Elections. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 147–164.
18.
GuntherRDiamondL (2003) Species of political parties: a new typology. Party Politics9(2): 167–199.
19.
HackerA (1965) Does a divisive primary harm a candidate’s election chances?American Political Science Review59(1): 105–110.
20.
JohnsonDBGibsonJR (1974) The divisiveness primary revisited: party activists in Iowa. American Political Science Review68(1): 67–77.
21.
KatzR (2001) The problem of candidate selection and models of party democracy. Party Politics7(3): 277–296.
22.
KatzRMairP (1995) Changing models of party organization and party democracy: the emergence of the cartel party. Party Politics1(1): 5–28.
23.
KenigO (2009) Democratization of party leadership selection: Do wider selectorates produce more competitive contests?Electoral Studies28(2): 240–247.
24.
KirchheimerO (1966) The transformation of Western European Party Systems. In: LaPalombaraJWeinerM (eds) Political Parties and Political Development. Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp. 177–199.
25.
LeDucL (2001) Democratizing party leadership selection. Party Politics7(3): 323–341.
26.
LisiM (2010) The democratization of party leadership selection: the Portuguese experience. Portuguese Journal of Political Science9(2): 127–149.
27.
LoboMC (2008) Parties and leader effects: impact of leaders in the vote for different types of parties. Party Politics14(3): 281–298.
28.
LoboMC (2014) Party and electoral leadership. In: RhodesRAWt’HartP (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Political Leadership. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 362–375.
29.
LoboMCCurticeJ (eds) (2014) Personality Politics? The Role of Leader Evaluations in Democratic Elections. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
30.
MairP (1997) Party System Change: Approaches and Interpretations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
31.
MairP (2013) Ruling the Void: The Hollowing of Western Democracies. London: Verso.
32.
MairPMüllerWPlasserF (2004) Conclusion. In: MairPMüllerWPlasserF (eds) Political Parties and Electoral Change: Party Responses to Electoral Markets. London: SAGE, pp. 264–274.
33.
MughanA (2015) Parties, conditionality and leader effects in parliamentary elections. Party Politics21(1): 28–39.
34.
MusellaF (2017) Political Leaders Beyond Party Politics. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
35.
PanebiancoA (1988) Political Parties: Organization and Power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
36.
PassarelliG (ed.) (2015) The Presidentialization of Political Parties. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
37.
PieresonJESmithTB (1975) Primary divisiveness and general election success: a re-examination. The Journal of Politics37: 555–562.
38.
PiletJCrossW (eds) (2014) The Selection of Political Party Leaders in Contemporary Parliamentary Democracies: A Comparative Study. New York: Routledge.
39.
PoguntkeTWebbP (2005a) The Presidentialization of Politics: A Comparative Study of Modern Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
40.
PoguntkeTWebbP (2005b) The Presidentialization of politics in democratic societies: a framework for analysis. In:PoguntkeTWebbP (eds) The Presidentialization of Politics: A Comparative Study of Modern Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 1–25.
PoguntkeTScarrowSWebbP, et al. (2016) Party rules, party resources, and the politics of parliamentary democracies: How parties organize in the 21st century. Party Politics22(6): 661–678.
43.
PopescuMGosselinTPereiraJS (2010) European Media Systems Survey 2010 (Dataset). Colchester: University of Essex. Available at: www.mediasystemsineurope.org (accessed 1 October 2019).
44.
RahatGKenigO (2018) From Party Politics to Personalized Politics?Oxford: Oxford University Press.
45.
SandriGSeddonneAVenturinoF (2015) Party Primaries in Comparative Perspective. Farnham: Ashgate.
46.
ScarrowSWebbPFarrellD (2000) From social integration to electoral contestation. In: DaltonRJWattenbergMP (eds) Parties Without Partisans: Political Change in Advanced Industrial Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 129–154.
47.
SchmitterPC (2001) Parties are not what they once were. In: DiamondLGuntherR (eds) Political Parties and Democracy. Baltimore; London: The Johns Hopkins University Press, pp. 67–89.
48.
SchmitterPCTrechselAH (2004) The Future of Democracy—Trends, Analyses and Reforms. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.
49.
van der EijkCFranklinM (1996) Choosing Europe? The European Electorate and National Politics in the Face of Union. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
50.
WebbPPoguntkeTKolodnyR (2012) The presidentialization of party leadership? Evaluating party leadership and party government in the democratic world. In: HelmsL (ed.) Comparative Political Leadership. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 77–98.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
