This article examines political parties’ approach to trade unions and the role of private and public party finance in contemporary democracies. We suggest that both unions’ direct donations and states’ party finance regimes may account for variation in the strength of parties’ organizational links to unions. We investigate this argument with a new data set covering parties historically aligned with trade unions and union confederations in 12 mature democracies. Our empirical analysis provides support for the hypothesis that financial contributions are positively associated with stronger organizational links but also suggests that this relationship is constrained by the level of public subsidies and state regulation of donations. The findings point to the need for more research on how private and public money affects parties’ interactions with civil society actors.
AllernEHBaleT (2012) Conclusion: qualifying the common wisdom. Party Politics18(1): 99–106.
2.
AllernEHBaleT (eds) (2017) Left-of-Centre Parties and Trade Unions in the Twenty-First Century. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
3.
AllernEHAylottNChristiansenFJ (2007) Social democrats and trade unions in Scandinavia: the decline and persistence of institutional relationships. European Journal of Political Research46(5): 607–635.
AnsolabehereSde FigueiredoJMSnyderJMJr (2003) Why is there so little money in US politics?Journal of Economic Perspectives17(1): 105–130.
6.
BaumgartnerFRLeechBL (1998) Basic Interests. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
7.
BawnKCohenMKarolD, et al. (2012) A theory of political parties: groups, policy demands and nominations in American politics. Perspectives on Politics10(3): 571–597.
8.
BinderkrantzAS (2015) Balancing gains and hazards: interest groups in electoral politics. Interest Groups & Advocacy4(2): 120–140.
9.
BombardiniMTrebbiF (2011) Votes or money? Theory and evidence from the US Congress. Journal of Public Economics95: 587–611.
10.
BrunellTL (2005) The relationship between political parties and interest groups: explaining patterns of PAC contributions to candidates for congress. Political Research Quarterly58(4): 681–688.
11.
Casas-ZamoraK (2005) Paying for Democracy: Political Finance and State Funding for Parties. Colchester, UK: ECPR Press.
12.
CelisKSchoutedenAWautersB (2015) Cleavage, ideology and identity. Explaining the linkage between representatives and interest groups. Parliamentary Affairs69(2): 348–365.
13.
HojnackiMKimballDCBaumgartnerFR, et al. (2012) Studying organizational advocacy and influence: reexamining interest group research. Annual Review of Political Science15: 379–399.
14.
HopkinJ (2004) The problem with party finance. Theoretical perspectives on the funding of party politics. Party Politics10(6): 627–651.
15.
HowellCDaleyAValeM (1992) Introduction: the transformation of political change. International Journal of Political Economy22(4): 3–16.
JahnD (2016) Changing of the guard: trends in corporatist arrangements in 42 highly industrialized societies from 1960 to 2010. Socio-Economic Review14(1): 47–71.
18.
KallaJBroockmanDE (2016) Campaign contributions facilitate access to congressional officials: a randomized field experiment. American Journal of Political Science60(3): 545–558.
19.
KatzRSMairP (1995) Changing models of party organization and party democracy: the emergence of the cartel party. Party Politics1(1): 5–28.
20.
KirchheimerO (1966) The transformation of the western European party systems. In: LaPalombaraJWeinerM (eds) Political Parties and Political Development. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, pp. 177–200.
21.
KogerGMasketSENoelH (2009) Partisan webs: information exchange and partisan networks. British Journal of Political Science39(3): 633–653.
22.
KoßM (2010) The Politics of Party Funding: State Funding to Political Parties and Party Competition in Western Europe. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
23.
LangbeinLI (1986) Money and access: some empirical evidence. The Journal of Politics48(4): 1052–1062.
24.
LongSFreeseJ (2014) Regression Models for Categorical Dependent Variables Using Stata. Texas: Stata Press.
25.
McLeanI (1987) Public Choice: An Introduction. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
26.
McMenaminI (2011) Liberal market economies, business, and political finance: Britain under new labour. West European Politics34(5): 1021–1043.
27.
McMenaminI (2012) If money talks, what does it say? Varieties of capitalism and business financing of parties. World Politics64(1): 1–38.
28.
MokkenRJ (1971). A Theory and Procedure of Scale Analysis: With Applications in Political Research. Berlin: De Gruyter.
29.
MüllerWC (2002) Parties and the institutional framework. In: LutherKRMüller-RommelF (eds) Political Parties in the New Europe: Political and Analytical Challenges. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, pp. 249–292.
30.
OtjesSRasmussenA (2017) The Collaboration between Interest Groups and Political Parties in Multi-party Democracies: Party System Dynamics and the Effect of Power and Ideology. Party Politics23(2): 96–109.
31.
PanebiancoA (1988) Political Parties: Organization and PowerCambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
32.
PoguntkeT (2015) Living in separate worlds? Left-wing parties and trade unions in European democracies. In: PoguntkeT, et al. (eds) Citizenship and Democracy in an Era of Crisis: Essays in Honour of Jan W. van DethLondon and New York: Routledge, pp. 169–186
33.
PoguntkeTScarrowSWebbP (2017) Political party database version 1a.3 (2017 Update). Available at:https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/LCZTAN(accessed 1 October 2018).
34.
PoguntkeTScarrowSWebbP, et al. (2016) Party rules, party resources and the politics of parliamentary democracies: how parties organize in the 21st century. Party Politics22(6): 661–678.
35.
QuinnT (2002) Block voting in the labour party. Party Politics8(2): 207–226.
36.
QuinnT (2010) New labour and the trade unions in Britain. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties20(3): 357–380.
37.
RasmussenALindeboomGJ (2013) Interest group-party linkage in the twenty-first century: evidence from Denmark, the Netherlands and the United Kingdom. European Journal of Political Research52(2): 264–289.
38.
SchattschneiderEE (1942) Party Government. New York, NY: Rinehart.
39.
SchwartzMA (2005) Linkage processes in party networks. In: RömmeleAFarrellDMIgnaziP (eds) Political Parties and Political Systems: The Concept of Linkage Revisited. Westport, CT: Praeger, pp. 37–60.
40.
SmithRA (1995) Interest group influence in the US congress. Legislative Studies Quarterly20(1): 89–139.
41.
SnyderJMJr (1992) Long-term investing in politicians; or, give early, give often. Journal of Law and Economics35: 15–43.
42.
StreeckWHasselA (2003) Trade unions as political actors. In: AddisonJTSchnabelC (eds) International Handbook of Trade Unions. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, pp. 335–365.
43.
TaylorAJ (1993) Trade unions and the politics of social democratic renewal. In: GillespieRPattersonWE (eds) Rethinking Social Democracy in Western Europe. London, UK: Frank Cass, pp. 133–154.
44.
ThomasCS (ed) (2001) Political Parties and Interest Groups: Shaping Democratic Governance. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.
45.
ThorlaksonL (2009) Patterns of party integration, influence and autonomy in seven federations. Party Politics15(2): 157–177.
46.
Van BiezenIKopeckýP (2014) The cartel party and the state: party–state linkages in European democracies. Party Politics20(2): 170–182.
47.
Van der ArkAL (2007) Mokken scale analysis in R. Journal of Statistical Software20(11): 1–19.
48.
VictorJNKogerG (2016) Financing friends: how lobbyists create a web of relationships among members of Congress. Interest Groups and Advocacy5(3): 224–262.
49.
VictorJNReinhardtGY (2018) Competing for the platform: how organized interests affect party positioning in the United States. Party Politics24(3): 265–277.
WarnerCM (2000) Confessions of an Interest Group. The Catholic Church and Political Parties in Europe. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
52.
ZeiglerH (1965) Interest Groups in American Society. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
