There are two targeting objectives for an election campaign: mobilizing core voters and chasing undecided voters. According to most previous research, negative campaigning exclusively fulfils a chasing function; parties use it to convince swing voters. The article argues that parties consider the mobilization of core voters as a second important function of negative campaigning. It is based on interviews with party campaign officials and a content analysis of election newspaper advertisements and press releases from the 2011 and 2015 Swiss National Council elections. The interviews and the analysis of parties’ attack behaviour show that parties use negative campaigning for mobilizing purposes, and in the analysed Swiss elections, it seems to be a more popular strategy than chasing.
AlbrightJJ (2008) Partisans or independents? Evidence for campaign targets from elite interviews in Spain. Electoral Studies27(4): 711–722.
2.
AnsolabehereSIyengarS (1995) Going Negative: How Political Advertisements Shrink and Polarize the Electorate. New York: Free Press.
3.
AnsolabehereSIyengarSSimonA, et al. (1994) Does attack advertising demobilize the electorate?The American Political Science Review88(4): 829–838.
4.
BakkerRde VriesCEdwardsE, et al. (2014) Measuring party positions in Europe: the Chapel Hill expert survey trend file, 1999–2010. Party Politics21(1): 143–152.
5.
BernhardL (2012) Campaign Strategy in Direct Democracy. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
6.
BolDBohlM (2015) Negative campaigning in proportional representation – yet non-coalition – systems: evidence from Switzerland. In: NaiAWalterAS (eds) New Perspectives on Negative Campaigning: Why Attack Politics Matters. Colchester: ECPR Press, pp. 113–125.
7.
BrubakerR (2004) Ethnicity without Groups. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
8.
BudesheimTLHoustonDADePaolaSJ (1996) Persuasiveness of in-group and out-group political messages: the case of negative political campaigning. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology70(3): 523–534.
9.
CuriniLMartelliP (2010) Ideological proximity and valence competition. Negative campaigning through allegation of corruption in the Italian legislative arena from 1946 to 1994. Electoral Studies29(4): 636–647.
10.
DolezalMEnnser-JedenastikLMüllerWC (2015) When do parties attack their competitors? Negative campaigning in Austria, 2002–08. In: NaiAWalterAS (eds) New Perspectives on Negative Campaigning: Why Attack Politics Matters. Colchester: ECPR Press, pp. 163–179.
11.
DoronGOnU (1983) A rational choice model of campaign strategy. In: ArianA (ed) The Elections in Israel 1981. Tel Aviv: Ramot Publishing, pp. 213–231.
12.
Elmelund-PræstekærC (2008) Negative campaigning in a multiparty system. Representation44(1): 27–39.
13.
Elmelund-PræstekærC (2010) Beyond American negativity: toward a general understanding of the determinants of negative campaigning. European Political Science Review2(01): 137–156.
14.
FDP.The Liberals (2011) Die FDP redet Klartext. Tagesanzeiger, 10 October.
15.
GeerJG (2006) In Defense of Negativity Attack Ads in Presidential Campaigns. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
16.
HaynesAARhineSL (1998) Attack politics in presidential nomination campaigns: an examination of the frequency and determinants of intermediated negative messages against opponents. Political Research Quarterly51(3): 691–721.
17.
HolbrookTMMcClurgSD (2005) The mobilization of core supporters: campaigns, turnout, and electoral composition in United States presidential elections. American Journal of Political Science49(4): 689–703.
18.
KahnKFKenneyPJ (1999) The Spectacle of U.S. Senate Campaigns. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
19.
KleinnijenhuisJOegemaDDe RiderJ, et al. (1998) Paarse Polarisatie: De Slag om de kiezer in de Media. Alphen aan den Rijn: Samsom.
20.
KriesiHGrandeEDolezalM, et al. (2012) Political Conflict in Western Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
21.
KriesiHGrandELachatR, et al. (2008) West European Politics in the Age of Globalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
22.
LauRRPomperGM (2001) Negative campaigning by US senate candidates. Party Politics7(1): 69–87.
23.
LauRRSigelmanLRovnerIB (2007) The effects of negative political campaigns: a meta-analytic reassessment. The Journal of Politics69(4): 1176–1209.
24.
LijphartA (1999) Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries. New Haven: Yale University Press.
25.
LongchampCImfeldMGolderL, et al. (2011) Medienbericht zum Wahlbarometer 2011, 4. Welle, Juni 2011. Studie im Auftrag von SRG SSR.
26.
MalloyLCPearson-MerkowitzS (2016) Going positive: the effects of negative and positive advertising on candidate success and voter turnout. Research & Politics3(1): 1–15.
27.
MartinPS (2004) Inside the black box of negative campaign effects: three reasons why negative campaigns mobilize. Political Psychology25(4): 545–562.
28.
NaiAWalterAS (2015) The war of words: the art of negative campaigning. In: NaiAWalterAS (eds) New Perspectives on Negative Campaigning: Why Attack Politics Matters. Colchester: ECPR Press, pp. 1–34.
29.
RidoutTNHollandJL (2010) Candidate strategies in the presidential nomination campaign. Presidential Studies Quarterly40(4): 611–630.
30.
RohrschneiderR (2002) Mobilizing versus chasing: how do parties target voters in election campaigns?Electoral Studies21(3): 367–382.
31.
SchattschneiderEE (1960) The Semisovereign People: A Realist’s View of Democracy in America. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
32.
Selects (2009) Enquête auprès des électrices et électeurs après les élections – 2007. Lausanne: FORS [distributor].
33.
Selects (2012) Enquête auprès des électrices et électeurs après les élections – 2011. Lausanne: FORS [distributor].
34.
SigelmanLShiraevE (2002) The rational attacker in Russia? Negative campaigning in Russian presidential elections. Journal of Politics64(1): 45–62.
35.
SkaperdasSGrofmanB (1995) Modeling negative campaigning. The American Political Science Review89(1): 49–61.
36.
Social Democratic Party (2011) Bürgerliche bereiten den nächsten Rentenabbau vor. 6 October.
37.
Swiss People’s Party (2011) Das wollen Linke, Nette und ihre Experten: Ivan S. soll weiter vergewaltigen. BZ Berner Zeitung, 6 July.
38.
WalterAS (2014) Choosing the enemy: attack behaviour in a multiparty system. Party Politics20(3): 311–323.
39.
WalterASVliegenthartR (2010) Negative campaigning across different communication channels: different ball games?The International Journal of Press/Politics15(4): 441–461.
40.
WalterASvan der BrugWvan PraagP (2014) When the stakes are high: party competition and negative campaigning. Comparative Political Studies47(4): 550–573.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
