What determines government responsiveness during fiscal austerity? Comparing the United Kingdom (UK) and France between 1975 and 2015 and using narrative accounts of austerity episodes, I argue that tax linkages (defined as the nature of dominant taxes, their governance and their dilemmas) shape partisan competition and fiscal responsiveness. I show how, despite comparable conditions, the UK and France implemented austerity simultaneously but opted for divergent types of fiscal responsiveness. In the UK, the right has been advantaged by centralized and weak tax linkages, which acted as a break on tax hikes and favoured spending cuts. In France, the left benefited from decentralized and strong tax linkages, which helped to increase taxes and made it hard to cut spending.
AdamSLoutzenhiserG (2007) Integrating income tax and national insurance: an interim report. IFS Working Paper W07(21), pp. 1–59.
2.
AlesinaABarbieroOFaveroC, et al. (2017) The effects of fiscal consolidations: theory and evidence. NBER Working Paper (No. 23385).
3.
AmableB (2017) Structural Crisis and Institutional Change in Modern Capitalism: French Capitalism in Transition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
4.
BardiLBartoliniSTrechselAH (2014) Responsive and responsible? The role of parties in twenty-first century politics. West European Politics37(2): 235–252.
5.
BatesRHLienDHD (1985) A note on taxation, development, and representative government. Politics and Society14(1): 53–70.
6.
BuchananJM (1963) The economics of earmarked taxes. Journal of Political Economy71(5): 457–469.
7.
CleggD (2015) The demise of tax credits. The Political Quarterly86(4): 493–499.
8.
CliftBRynerM (2014) Joined at the hip, but pulling apart? Franco-German relations, the Eurozone crisis and the politics of austerity. French Politics12(2): 136–163.
9.
CulpepperPDHallPAPalierB (2006) Changing France: The Politics That Markets Make. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
10.
DauntonM (2002) Just Taxes: The Politics of Taxation in Britain, 1914–1979. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
11.
De MooijRKeenM (2012) ‘Fiscal devaluation’ and fiscal consolidation: the VAT in troubled times. IMF Working Paper WP/12/85, Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.
12.
Dellepiane-AvellanedaS (2014) The political power of economic ideas: the case of ‘expansionary fiscal contractions’. The British Journal of Politics & International Relations17(3): 391–418.
13.
DevriesPGuajardoJLeighD, et al. (2011) A new action-based dataset of fiscal consolidation. IMF Working Paper WP/11/128, Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.
14.
FullaM (2016) Les Socialistes Français et l’Economie (1944–1981): Une Histoire Economique du Politique. Paris: Les Presses de Sciences Po.
15.
HallPA (1986) Governing the Economy: The Politics of State Intervention in Britain and France. New York: Oxford University Press.
16.
HallerbergM (2004) Domestic Budgets in a United Europe: Fiscal Governance from the End of Bretton Woods to EMU. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
17.
HardieIHowarthD (2009) Die Krise but not La Crise? The financial crisis and the transformation of German and French banking systems. Journal of Common Market Studies47(5): 1017–1039.
18.
HoodC (1985) British tax structure development as administrative adaptation. Policy Sciences18: 3–31.
19.
KatoJ (2003) Regressive Taxation and the Welfare State: Path Dependence and Policy Diffusion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
20.
KayJKingMA (1983) The British Tax System. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
21.
KitscheltH (2001) Partisan competition and welfare state retrenchment: when do politicians choose unpopular policies? In: PiersonP (ed.) The New Politics of the Welfare State. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 265–302.
22.
KonishiATristramF (2015) The difficulty of fiscal consolidation in France. In: ParkGIdeE (eds) Deficits and Debt in Industrialized Democracies. New York: Routledge, pp. 20–43.
23.
LemoineB (2016) L’Ordre de la Dette: Enquête sur les Infortunes de l’État et la Prospérité du Marché. Paris: La Découverte.
24.
LeviM (1989) Of Rule and Revenue. California: University of California Press.
25.
LoweR (1994) A prophet dishonoured in his own country? The rejection of Beveridge in Britain, 1945–1970. In: HillsJDitchJGlennersterH (eds) Beveridge and Social Security: An International Retrospective. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 118–133.
26.
Mulas-GranadosC (2006) Economics, Politics and Budgets: The Political Economy of Fiscal Consolidations in Europe. Basingstoke; New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
27.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2015) National Accounts at a Glance. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
28.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2017a) Economic Outlook No. 101: Statistics and Projections. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
29.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2017b) Labour Force Statistics. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
30.
O’SullivanM (2007) Acting out institutional change: understanding the recent transformation of the French financial system. Socio-Economic Review5(3): 389–436.
31.
PalierB (2002) Gouverner la Sécurité Sociale: Les Réformes du Système Français de Protection Sociale Depuis 1945. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
32.
SchmidtM (1996) When parties matter: a review of the possibilities and limits of partisan influence on public policy. European Journal of Political Research30(2): 155–183.
33.
SchumpeterJ (1991) The crisis of the tax state. In: SwedbergR (ed.) The Economics and Sociology of Capitalism, New Jersey: Princeton University Press, pp. 99–140.
34.
ShaughnessySS (1994) The “cotisation sociale généralisée”: An idea whose time had come. Modern & Contemporary France2(4): 405–419.
35.
ShoupCS (1930) The Sales Tax in France. New York: Columbia University Press.
36.
SpireA (2013) The spread of tax resistance: the antitax movement in France in the 1970s. Journal of Policy History25(3): 444–460.
37.
SteinmoS (1993) Taxation and Democracy: Swedish, British and American Approaches to Financing the Modern State. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
38.
TimmonsJF (2005) The fiscal contract: states, taxes, and public services. World Politics57(4): 530–567.
39.
VisserJ (2016) ICTWSS Database. Version 5.1. Amsterdam: Amsterdam Institute for Advanced Labour Studies (AIAS), University of Amsterdam.
40.
VolkensALehmannPMerzN, et al. (2014) The Manifesto Data Collection. Manifesto Project (MRG/CMP/MARPOR). Berlin: WZB Berlin Social Science Center, Version 2014a.
41.
WhiteEN (1995) The French Revolution and the politics of government finance, 1770–1815. The Journal of Economic History55(2): 227–255.
