Do economic policy preferences distinguish populist voters from mainstream ones? We compare the preference profile of the voters of the Five Star Movement (M5S), one of the most successful southern European populist parties, with the profile of voters of other parties at both the 2013 national and the 2014 European Parliament elections by means of a conjoint analysis experiment on economic policy programs. Despite economic insecurity and recent recessions being key drivers of populist voting, we provide evidence that M5S supporters are fiscally moderate: they are happy with the current size of government and oppose more spending. Their Euroscepticism, shared with right-wing voters and representing a new domestic divide, takes the form of a lukewarm support for the euro, which they would readily ditch if it were to improve economic performance.
AdamsJClarkMEzrowL, et al. (2006) Are niche parties fundamentally different from mainstream parties? The causes and the electoral consequences of Western European parties’ policy shifts, 1976–1998. American Journal of Political Science50(3): 513–529.
2.
AspinwallM (2002) Preferring Europe: Ideology and national preferences on European integration. European Union Politics3: 81–111.
3.
BardiLBartoliniSTrechselAH (2014) Responsive and responsible? The role of parties in twenty-first century politics. West European Politics37(2): 235–252.
4.
BartoliniSMairP ([1990] 2007) Identity, Competition and Electoral Availability: The Stabilisation of European Electorates 1885–1985. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
5.
BechtelMHainmuellerJMargalitY (2017) Policy design and domestic support for international bailouts. European Journal of Political Research56(4): 864–886.
6.
BirchSDennisonJ (2017) How protest voters choose. Party Politics25(2): 110–125.
7.
BobbaGMcDonnellD (2016) Different types of right-wing populist discourse in government and opposition: the case of Italy. South European Society and Politics21(3): 281–299.
8.
BordignonFCeccariniL (2013) Five Stars and a cricket. Beppe Grillo shakes Italian politics. South European Society and Politics18(4): 427–449.
9.
CarusoL (2016) Economia e populismo. Il trasversalismo del Movimento 5 Stelle alla prova della dimensione economica e sociale. Quaderni di Scienza Politica23(1): 25–54.
10.
CeccariniLBordignonF (2016) The five stars continue to shine: the consolidation of Grillo’s “movement party” in Italy. Contemporary Italian Politics8(2): 131–159.
11.
CollocaPCorbettaP (2015) The ideological positioning of Five Star Movement voters. In: TronconiF (ed) Beppe Grillo’s Five Star Movement: Organisation, Communication and Ideology. Farnham: Ashgate Publishing Ltd, pp. 195–213.
12.
CorbettaPGualminiE (2013) Il Partito di Grillo. Bologna: Il Mulino.
13.
CremonesiC (2017) Populism and Euroscepticism, the case of the Italian Five Star Movement in 2013: an analysis of party direct communication and media coverage. In: BârgăoanuAButuroiuRRaduL (eds) Why Europe? Narratives and Counter-narratives of European Integration. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, pp. 245–268.
14.
Deegan-KrauseK (2007) New dimensions of political cleavage. In: DaltonRJKlingemannHD (eds) Oxford Handbook of Political Science. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 538–556.
15.
De LangeSL (2007) A new winning formula? The programmatic appeal of the radical right. Party Politics13(4): 411–435.
16.
De VriesCEdwardsEE (2009) Taking Europe to its extremes: extremist parties and public euroscepticism. Party Politics15(1): 5–28.
17.
Di VirgilioAGiannettiDPedrazzaniA, et al. (2015) Party competition in the 2013 Italian elections: evidence from an expert survey. Government and Opposition50(1): 65–89.
FranchinoFZucchiniF (2015) Voting in a multi-dimensional space: a conjoint analysis employing valence and ideology attributes of candidates. Political Science Research and Methods3(2): 221–241.
20.
FranzosiPMaroneFSalvatiE (2015) Populism and Euroscepticism in the Italian five star movement. The International Spectator50(2): 109–124.
21.
GabelMJ (1998a) Public support for European integration: an empirical test of five theories. The Journal of Politics60(2): 333–354.
22.
GabelMJ (1998b) Interests and Integration: Market Liberalization, Public Opinion, and European Union. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
23.
GiannettiDPedrazzaniAPintoL (2016) Party system change in Italy: politicising the EU and the rise of eccentric parties. South European Society and Politics21(1): 1–22.
24.
GrandeEKriesiH (2012) The transformative power of globalization and the structure of political conflict in Western Europe. In: KriesiHGrandeEDolezalM, et al. (eds) Political conflict in Western Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 3–35.
25.
GuisoLHerreraHMorelliM, et al. (2017) Demand and supply of populism. Discussion Paper DP11871 - Centre for Economic and Policy Research. Available at: www.cepr.org(accessed 10 September 2017).
26.
HainmuellerJHopkinsDJYamamotoT (2014) Causal inference in conjoint analysis: understanding multidimensional choices via stated preference experiments. Political Analysis22(1): 1–30.
27.
HainmuellerJHopkinsDJ (2015) The hidden American immigration consensus: a conjoint analysis of attitudes toward immigrants. American Journal of Political Science59(3): 529–548.
28.
HakhverdianAKoopC (2007) Consensus democracy and support for populist parties in Western Europe. Acta Politica42(4): 401–420.
29.
HernándezEKriesiH (2016) The electoral consequences of the financial and economic crisis in Europe. European Journal of Political Research55(2): 203–224.
30.
HixSLordC (1997) Political parties in the European Union. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
31.
HoogheLMarksG (1999) The making of a polity: the struggle over European integration. In: KitscheltHLangePMarksG, et al. (eds) Continuity and Change in Contemporary Capitalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 70–98.
32.
HoogheLMarksGWilsonCJ (2002) Does left/right structure party positions on European integration?Comparative Political Studies35(8): 965–989.
33.
HoogheMOserJ (2016) The electoral success of the movimento 5 stelle: an example of a left populist vote?OZP – Austrian Journal of Political Science44(4): 25–36.
34.
InglehartR (1977) The Silent Revolution: Changing Values and Political Style among Western Publics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
35.
Itanes (2013) Voto Amaro: Mutamento e Crisi Politica nelle Elezioni del 2013. Bologna: Il Mulino.
36.
IvarsflatenE (2008) What unites right-wing populists in Western Europe?Comparative Political Studies41: 3–23.
37.
JagersJWalgraveS (2007) Populism as a political communication style: an empirical study of political parties’ discourses in Belgium. European Journal of Political Research46(3): 319–345.
38.
KitscheltHMcGannAJ (1995) The Radical Right in Western Europe. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
39.
KriesiHGrandeELachatR, et al. (2008) West European Politics in the Age of Globalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–22.
40.
KriesiHGrandeELachatR, et al. (2006) Globalization and the transformation of the national political space: Six European countries compared. European Journal of Political Research45: 921–956.
41.
KriesiHPappasTS (2015) ‘Populism in Europe During Crisis: An Introduction’. In: KriesiHPappasTS (eds) European Populism in the Shadow of the Great Recession. Colchester: ECPR Press, pp. 1–19.
42.
MairP (2009) Representative vs. responsible government. MPIfG Working Paper 09/8, Cologne: Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies. Available at: http://bit.ly/1JrhgrT (accessed 10 September 2017).
43.
MarchL (2011) Radical Left Parties in Europe. London: Routledge.
44.
MarksGWilsonCJ (2000) The past in the present: a cleavage theory of party response to European integration. British Journal of Political Science30: 433–459.
45.
MarksGWilsonCJRayL (2002) National political parties and European integration. American Journal of Political Science46: 585–594.
46.
MeguidBM (2005) Competition between unequals: the role of mainstream party strategy in niche party success. American Political Science Review99(3): 347–359.
47.
MényYSurelY (2002) The constitutive ambiguity of populism. In: MényYSurelY (eds) Democracies and the Populist Challenge. New York: Palgrave, pp. 1–21.
48.
MoscaL (2013) The Five Star Movement: Exception or vanguard in Europe?The International Spectator49(1): 36–52.
49.
MuddeC (2004) The populist Zeitgeist. Government and Opposition39: 542–563.
50.
MuddeC (2007) Populist Radical Right Parties in Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
51.
OtjesSKatsanidouA (2017) Beyond Kriesiland: EU integration as a super issue after the Eurocrisis. European Journal of Political Research56: 301–319.
52.
PassarelliGTuortoD (2017) The five star movement: purely a matter of protest? the rise of a new party between political discontent and reasoned voting. Party Politics24(2): 129–140.
53.
PedrazzaniAPintoL (2015) The electoral base: the “political revolution” in evolution. In: TronconiF (ed) Beppe Grillo’s Five Star Movement. Organisazion, Communication and Ideology. Farnham: Ashgate Publishing Ltd, pp. 75–98.
54.
PolkJRovnyJBakkerR, et al. (2017) Explaining the salience of anti-elitism and reducing political corruption for political parties in Europe with the 2014 Chapel Hill Expert Survey data. Research & Politics1: 1–9.
55.
RombiS (2016) European voters in the face of crisis: the prominence of unemployment. Italian Political Science Review46(2): 151–173.
56.
RooduijnM (2017) Flank attacks. Populism and left-right radicalism in Western Europe. Party Politics23(3): 193–204.
57.
RooduijnMde LangeSLvan der BrugW (2014) A populist zeitgeist? programmatic contagion by populist parties in Western Europe. Party Politics20(4): 563–575.
58.
RooduijnMPauwelsT (2011) Measuring populism: comparing two methods of content analysis. West European Politics34(6): 1272–1283.
59.
RussoLRieraPVerthéT (2017) Tracing the electorate of the movimento cinque stelle: an ecological inference analysis. Italian Political Science Review47(1): 45–62.
60.
SalvatiE (2016) The Five Star Movement in the European Parliament. A real Eurosceptic party? In: ECPR General Conference, Prague, 7–10 September 2016. Available at: https://ecpr.eu/Events/PaperDetails.aspx?PaperID=29527&EventID=95 (accessed 10 September 2017).
61.
SchumacherGRooduijnM (2013) Sympathy for the ‘devil’? Voting for populists in the 2006 and 2010 Dutch general elections. Electoral Studies32: 124–133.
62.
SitterN (2001) The politics of opposition and European integration in Scandinavia: is Euro-Scepticism a government-opposition dynamic?West European Politics24(4): 22–39.
TaggartP (1998) A touchstone of dissent: euroscepticism in contemporary Western European party systems. European Journal of Political Research33(3): 363–388.
65.
TaggartP (2004) Populism and representative politics in contemporary Europe. Journal of Political Ideologies9(3): 269–288.
66.
TarchiM (2015) Italia populista. Dal qualunquismo a Beppe Grillo. Bologna: Il Mulino.
67.
TronconiF (2015) Beppe Grillo’s Five Star Movement: Organisation, Communication and Ideology. Farnham: Ashgate Publishing Ltd.
68.
Van der BrugWMughanA (2007) Charisma, leader effects and support for right-wing populist parties. Party Politics13(1): 29–51.
69.
Van der BrugWvan SpanjeJ (2009) Immigration, Europe and the “new” cultural cleavage. European Journal of Political Research48(3): 309–334.
70.
Van der BrugWFennemaMTillieJ (2000) Anti-immigrant parties in Europe: ideological or protest vote?European Journal of Political Research37: 77–102.
71.
Van der BrugWFennemaMTillieJ (2005) Why some anti-immigrant parties fail and others succeed. Comparative Political Studies38: 537–573.
72.
VerbeekBZasloveA (2016) Italy: a case of mutating populism?Democratization23(2): 304–323.
73.
VezzoniC (2014) Italian national election survey 2013: a further step in a consolidating tradition. Italian Political Science Review44(1): 81–108.
74.
VivyaNWagnerM (2016) House or home? Constituent preferences over legislator effort allocation. European Journal of Political Research55(1): 81–99.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
