Does economic globalization influence the economic policy positions adopted by political parties in democratic countries? In this article, we identify multiple pathways through which market integration might induce ideological change among both left and right parties. Utilizing data from 51 countries between 1970 and 2014, we evaluate the degree to which leftist and rightist economic ideologies, respectively, are present in parties’ platforms. We find that traditionally leftist positions are increasingly adopted by parties on both the right and the left in response to globalization. The evidence also suggests that, though there is a general tendency among parties to shift their economic platforms leftward in response to liberalization, there is significant between-country variability in the effects. An important implication of this study is that partisan ideological evolution is not driven solely by domestic forces, but by external factors, too.
AdamsJClarkMEzrowL, et al. (2004) Understanding change and stability in party ideologies: do parties respond to public opinion or to past election results?British Journal of Political Science34(04): 589–610.
2.
AdamsJHauptABStollH (2009) What moves parties? The role of public opinion and global economic conditions in Western Europe. Comparative Political Studies42(5): 611–639.
3.
AlbertoARosenthalH (1995) Partisan Politics, Divided Government and the Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
4.
AlesinaAWacziargR (1998) Openness, country size and government. Journal of public Economics69(3): 305–321.
5.
BearceDH (2003) Societal preferences, partisan agents, and monetary policy outcomes. International Organization57(2): 373–410.
6.
BeckNKatzJN (1995) What to do (and not to do) with time-series cross-section data. American political science review89(03): 634–647.
7.
BenoitKLaverMMikhaylovS (2009) Treating words as data with error: uncertainty in text statements of policy positions. American Journal of Political Science53(2): 495–513.
8.
BurgoonB (2001) Globalization and welfare compensation: disentangling the ties that bind. International Organization55(03): 509–551.
9.
ChangKKimYTomljanovichM, et al. (2013) Do political parties foster business cycles? An examination of developed economies. Journal of Comparative Economics41(1): 212–226.
10.
DreherA (2006) KOF Index of Globalization. Zürich: Konjunkturforschungsstelle ETH Zürich.
11.
DreznerDW (2001) Globalization and policy convergence. International Studies Review3(1): 53–78.
12.
EriksonRMacKuenMStimsonJ (2002) The Macro Polity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
13.
EzrowL (2007) The variance matters: how party systems represent the preferences of voters. Journal of Politics69: 182–92.
14.
FriedenJA (1991) The politics of national economic policies in a world of global finance. International Organization45(4): 425–451.
15.
GarrettG (1995) Capital mobility, trade, and the domestic politics of economic policy. International Organization49(04): 657–687.
16.
GarretGLangeP (1991) Political responses to interdependence: what’s “left” for the left?International Organization45(4): 539–564.
17.
HauptAB (2010) Parties’ Responses to economic globalization what is left for the left and right for the right?Party Politics16(1): 5–27.
18.
HestonASummersRAtenB (2012) Penn World Table Version 7.1 Center for International Comparisons of Production, Income and Prices at the University of Pennsylvania, November.
19.
HibbsDA (1977) Political parties and macroeconomic policy. American Political Science Review71(04): 1467–1487.
20.
KastnerSLChadR (2005) Partisanship and the path to financial openness. Comparative Political Studies38(5): 484–506.
21.
KayserMA (2007) How domestic is domestic politics? Globalization and elections. Annual Review of Political Science10: 341–362.
22.
KeohaneROMilnerHV eds. (1996) Internationalization and domestic politics: an introduction. Internationalization and Domestic Politics, Cambridge University Press3–24.
23.
KimSY (2007) Openness, external risk, and volatility: implications for the compensation hypothesis. International Organization61(01): 181–216.
24.
KlingemannHVolkensABaraJ, et al. (2006) Mapping Policy Preferences II: Estimates for Parties, Electors, and Governments in Eastern Europe, European Union and OECD 1990–2003. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
25.
Lewis-BeckMSPaldamM (2000) Economic voting: an introduction. Electoral studies19(2): 113–121.
26.
LockwoodBMichelaR (2005) The CSGR Globalisation Index: An Introductory Guide. Working Paper 155/04, Centre for the Study of Globalisation and Regionalisation.
27.
McDonaldMBudgeI (2005) Elections, Parties, Democracy: Conferring the Median Mandate. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
28.
MilnerHVJudkinsB (2004) Partisanship, trade policy, and globalization: is there a left–right divide on trade policy?International Studies Quarterly48(1): 95–120.
29.
MosleyLSaikaU (2007) Racing to the bottom of climbing to the top? Economic globalization and collective labor rights. Comparative Political Studies40(8): 923–948.
30.
NanouK (2013) Different origins, same proposals? The impact of the EU on the policy direction of party families. West European Politics36(1): 248–269.
31.
NordhausWDAlesinaASchultzeCL (1989) Alternative approaches to the political business cycle. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity1989(2): 1–68.
32.
OatleyT (1999) How constraining is capital mobility? The partisan hypothesis in an open economy. American Journal of Political Science43(4): 1003–1027.
33.
PolanyiK (1944 [2001]) The Great Transformation. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
34.
PotrafkeN (2009) Did globalization restrict partisan politics? An empirical evaluation of social expenditures in a panel of OECD countries. Public Choice140(1–2): 105–124.
35.
RicardoD (1817 [2004]) On the Principles of Political Economy and Taxation. London: Dover Publications.
36.
RodrikD (1998) Why do more open economies have bigger governments?Journal of Political Economy106(5): 997–1032.
37.
RogowskiR (1987) Political cleavages and changing exposure to trade. American Political Science Review81(4): 1121–1137.
38.
RudraN (2002) Globalization and the decline of the welfare state in less-developed countries. International Organization56(2): 411–445.
39.
SmithA (1776 [2003]) The Wealth of Nations. Boston, MA: Bantam Classics.
40.
SteinerNDMartinCW (2012) Economic integration, party polarisation and electoral turnout. West European Politics35(2): 238–265.
41.
VolkensALehmannPMatthießT, et al. (2015) The Manifesto Data Collection. Manifesto Project (MRG/CMP/MARPOR) Version 2015a. Berlin: Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung (WZB).
42.
WardHEzrowLDorussenH (2011) Globalization, party positions, and the median voter. World Politics63(03): 509–547.
43.
WardDKimJHGraham1M, et al. (2015) How economic integration affects party issue emphases. Comparative Political Studies48: 1227–1259.
44.
WestBTKathleenBWAndrzejTG (2014) Linear Mixed Models: A Practical Guide Using Statistical Software. Boca Raton: CRC Press.
45.
WibbelsE (2006) Dependency revisited: international markets, business cycles, and social spending in the developing world. International Organization60(02): 433–468.
46.
WilsonSEButlerDM (2007) A lot more to do: the sensitivity of time-series cross-section analyses to simple alternative specifications. Political Analysis15(2): 101–123.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
