How have social democratic parties responded to the recent economic crisis? For many observers, the Great Recession and the prevalence of austerity in response to it have contributed to a crisis of social democracy in Europe. This article examines the programmatic response of social democratic parties to this crisis in 11 Western European countries. It uses an original data set that records the salience that parties attribute to different issues and the positions that they adopt with regard to these issues during electoral campaigns and compares the platforms of social democratic parties before and after 2008. For this purpose, the article disentangles economic issues into three different categories and shows that this is necessary in order to understand party competition during the Great Recession: while social democratic parties shifted to the left with regard to issues relating to welfare and economic liberalism, they largely accepted the need for budgetary rigour and austerity policies.
AdamsJHauptABStollH (2009) What moves parties? The role of public opinion and global economic conditions in Western Europe. Comparative Political Studies42(5): 611–639.
2.
AllanJPScruggsL (2004) Political partisanship and welfare state reform in advanced industrial societies. American Journal of Political Science48(3): 496–512.
3.
AltiparmakisALorenziniJ (2018) Disclaiming national representatives: protest waves in Southern Europe during the eurozone crisis. Party Politics24(1): 78–89.
4.
ArmingeonKGuthmannKWeisstannerD (2016) Choosing the path of austerity: how parties and policy coalitions influence welfare state retrenchment in periods of fiscal consolidation. West European Politics39(4): 628–647.
BeanC (2010) Joseph Schumpeter lecture: the great moderation, the great panic, and the great contraction. Journal of the European Economic Association8(2–3): 289–325.
8.
BergerS (2000) Globalization and politics. Annual Review of Political Science3(1): 43–62.
9.
BlanchardODell’AricciaGMauroP (2010) Rethinking macroeconomic policy. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking42: 199–215.
10.
BlythM (2002) Great Transformations: Economic Ideas and Institutional Change in the Twentieth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
11.
BoixC (1998) Political Parties, Growth and Equality: Conservative and Social Democratic Economic Strategies in the World Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
12.
BudgeIFarlieD (1983) Explaining and Predicting Elections: Issue Effects and Party Strategies in Twenty-Three Democracies. London; Boston: Allen & Unwin.
13.
BudgeIKlingemannHDVolkensA. (eds) (2001) Mapping Policy Preferences: Estimates for Parties, Electors, and Governments, 1945–1998. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.
14.
BudgeI (1994) A new spatial theory of party competition: uncertainty, ideology and policy equilibria viewed comparatively and temporally. British Journal of Political Science24(4): 443–467.
15.
BurgoonB (2001) Globalization and welfare compensation: disentangling the ties that bind. International Organization55(3): 509–551.
16.
CallaghanJ (2000) The Retreat of Social Democracy. Manchester, New York: Manchester University Press.
17.
CapocciaGKelemenRD (2007) The study of critical junctures: theory, narrative, and counterfactuals in historical institutionalism. World Politics59(03): 341–369.
18.
CapocciaG (2015) Critical junctures and institutional change. In: MahoneyJThelenK (eds) Advances in Comparative Historical Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 147–179.
19.
ClementsBNanouK (2017) Economic crisis and party responsiveness in the European Union: left-right ideology, the economy and social welfare. Party Politics24(1): 52–64.
20.
CollierRBCollierD (1991) Shaping the Political Arena: Critical Junctures, the Labor Movement, and Regime Dynamics in Latin America. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
21.
DaltonRJMcAllisterI (2015) Random walk or planned excursion? Continuity and change in the left–right positions of political parties. Comparative Political Studies48(6): 759–787.
22.
DaltonRJ (2016) Stability and change in party issue positions: the 2009 and 2014 European elections. Electoral Studies44: 525–534.
23.
DolezalMEnnser-JedenastikLMüllerWC. (2014) How parties compete for votes: a test of saliency theory. European Journal of Political Research53(1): 57–76.
24.
DownsA (1957) An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harber & Row.
25.
EnglishPGrassoMTBuraczynskaB. (2016) Convergence on crisis? Comparing Labour and Conservative Party framing of the economic crisis in Britain, 2008–14. Politics & Policy44(3): 577–603.
26.
EzrowLDe VriesCSteenbergenMEdwardsE (2011) Mean voter representation and partisan constituency representation: Do parties respond to the mean voter position or to their supporters?Party Politics17(3): 275–301.
27.
FranklinMNMackieTTValenH (1992) Electoral Change: Responses to Evolving Social and Attitudinal Structures in Western Countries. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.
28.
GarrettGLangeP (1991) Political responses to interdependence: what’s “left” for the left?International Organization45(4): 539–564.
29.
GemenisK (2013) What to do (and not to do) with the comparative manifestos project data. Political Studies61: 3–23.
30.
Glyn A (ed) (2001) Social Democracy in Neoliberal Times: The Left and Economic Policy since 1980. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
31.
GourevitchP (1986) Politics in Hard Times: Comparative Responses to International Economic Crises. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
32.
GreenJHoboltSB (2008) Owning the issue agenda: party strategies and vote choices in British elections. Electoral Studies27(3): 460–476.
HallP (2013) The political origins of our economic discontents: contemporary adjustment problems in historical perspective. In: KahlerMLakeDA (eds) Politics in the New Hard Times: The Great Recession in Comparative Perspective. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, pp. 129–149.
35.
HallPA (1993) Policy paradigms, social learning, and the state: the case of economic policymaking in Britain. Comparative Politics25(3): 275.
36.
HauptAB (2010) Parties’ responses to economic globalization what is left for the left and right for the right?Party Politics16(1): 5–27.
37.
HelblingMTreschA (2011) Measuring party positions and issue salience from media coverage: discussing and cross-validating new indicators. Electoral Studies30(1): 174–183.
38.
HernándezEKriesiH (2016) The electoral consequences of the financial and economic crisis in Europe. European Journal of Political Research55(2): 203–224.
39.
HibbsDAJr (1977) Political parties and macroeconomic policy. The American Political Science Review71(4): 1467–1487.
40.
HoogheLMarksG (2009) A postfunctionalist theory of European integration: from permissive consensus to constraining dissensus. British Journal of Political Science39(1): 1–23.
41.
HoogheLMarksG (2018) Cleavage theory meets Europe’s crises: lipset, rokkan, and the transnational cleavage. Journal of European Public Policy25(1): 109–135.
42.
HuberJDPowellGB (1994) Congruence between citizens and policymakers in two visions of liberal democracy. World Politics46(03): 291–326.
43.
HutterSKriesiHVidalG (2018) Old versus new politics: the political spaces in Southern Europe in times of crises. Party Politics24(1): 10–22.
44.
KitscheltH (1994) The Transformation of European Social Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
45.
KleinnijenhuisJPenningsP (2001) Measurement of party positions on the basis of party programmes, media coverage and voter perceptions. In: LaverM (ed), Estimating the Policy Position of Political Actors. London: Routledge, pp. 162–182.
46.
KleinnijenhuisJde RidderJARietbergEM (1997) Reasoning in economic discourse: an application of the network approach to the Dutch press. In: Roberts, CW (ed), Text Analysis for the Social Sciences, Methods for Drawing Statistical Inferences from Texts and Transcripts. New York: Erlbaum, pp. 191–207.
47.
KorpiW (1983) The Democratic Class Struggle. London; Boston: Routledge & K. Paul.
48.
KraftJ (2017) Social democratic austerity: the conditional role of agenda dynamics and issue ownership. Journal of European Public Policy24(10): 1430–1449.
49.
KriesiHGrandeEDolezalM. (2012) Political Conflict in Western Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
50.
KriesiHGrandeELachatR. (2008) West European Politics in the Age of Globalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
51.
LipsetSMRokkanS (1967) Party Systems and Voter Alignments: Cross National Perspectives. New York: Free Press.
52.
MülerWCStrømK (eds) (1999) Policy, Office, or Votes? How Political Parties in Western Europe Make Hard Decisions. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.
MaatschA (2014) Are we all austerians now? An analysis of national parliamentary parties’ positioning on anti-crisis measures in the eurozone. Journal of European Public Policy21(1): 96–115.
55.
MargalitY (2013) Explaining social policy preferences: evidence from the great recession. American Political Science Review107(01): 80–103.
56.
MatthijsMMcNamaraK (2015) The euro crisis’ theory effect: northern saints, southern sinners, and the demise of the Eurobond. Journal of European Integration37(2): 229–245.
57.
MatthijsM (2011) Ideas and Economic Crises in Britain from Attlee to Blair (1945–2005). New York, NY: Routledge.
58.
McDonaldMDBudgeI (2005) Elections, Parties, Democracy: Conferring the Median Mandate. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
59.
MishraR (1999) Globalization and the Welfare State. Cheltenham, UK; Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
60.
OtjesSKatsanidouA (2017) Beyond Kriesiland: EU integration as a super issue after the Eurocrisis. European Journal of Political Research56: 301–319.
61.
OtjesS (2016) Distinguishing welfare state reform and income redistribution. A two-dimensional approach to the Dutch voter space on economic issues. Party PoliticsAvailable at: journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/1354068816663039.
62.
PetrocikJRBenoitWLHansenGJ (2003) Issue ownership and presidential campaigning, 1952–2000. Political Science Quarterly118(4): 599–626.
63.
PetrocikJR (1996) Issue ownership in presidential elections, with a 1980 case study. American Journal of Political Science40(3): 825–850.
64.
PiazzaJ (2001) De-linking labor: labor unions and social democratic parties under globalization. Party Politics7(4): 413–435.
65.
PiersonC (2001) Hard Choices: Social Democracy in the Twenty-first Century. Oxford; Malden, MA: Polity Press; Blackwell.
66.
PiersonP (2000) Increasing returns, path dependence, and the study of politics. The American Political Science Review94(2): 251.
67.
PontussonJRaessD (2012) How (and why) is this time different? The politics of economic crisis in Western Europe and the United States. Annual Review of Political Science15: 13–33.
68.
PrzeworskiASpragueJD (1986) Paper Stones: A History of Electoral Socialism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
69.
RobertsKM (2013) Market reform, programmatic (de)alignment, and party system stability in Latin America. Comparative Political Studies46(11): 1422–1452.
70.
RobertsKM (2017) Party politics in hard times: comparative perspectives on the European and Latin American economic crises. European Journal of Political Research56(2): 218–233.
71.
RossF (2000) “Beyond left and right”: the new partisan politics of welfare. Governance13(2): 155–183.
72.
ScharpfFW (1987) Sozialdemokratische Krisenpolitik in Europa. Frankfurt: Campus.
73.
SingerM (2011) When do voters actually think “It’s the Economy”? Evidence from the 2008 presidential campaign. Electoral Studies30(4): 621–632.
TraberDGigerNHäusermannS (2017) How economic crises affect political representation: Declining party-voter congruence in times of constrained government. West European Politics. Available athttps://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2017.1378984.
83.
VolkensALehmannPMatthießT. (2017) Manifesto Project (MRG/CMP/MARPOR). Version 2017a. Berlin: Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung (WZB). Available at: https://doi.org/10.25522/manifesto.mpds.2017a (accessed 16 November 2017).
84.
WagnerMMeyerTM (2014) Which issues do parties emphasise? Salience strategies and party organisation in multiparty systems. West European Politics37(5): 1019–1045.
85.
WardDKimJHGrahamM. (2015) How economic integration affects party issue emphases. Comparative Political Studies48(10): 1227–1259.
86.
WardHEzrowLDorussenH (2011) Globalization, party positions, and the median voter. World Politics63(3): 509–547.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
