Democratic performance and party system institutionalization (PSI) are thought to be integrally linked. Electoral volatility is an important dimension of PSI and has thus been the focus of many studies. Despite the attention given to electoral volatility, its determinants remain elusive. We examine the determinants of electoral volatility in 35 African countries from 1972 to 2010. This study extends the prior literature by analyzing the effects of two previously unexamined variables, foreign aid and structural adjustment, on electoral volatility. Our results indicate that electoral volatility is lower when foreign aid is high, while structural adjustment programs are associated with increased volatility. Our findings contribute to the research on the political economy of aid, illustrating the impact of these economic practices on election outcomes. Political institutions and social demography also appear to affect volatility. Based on our analysis, the party systems of Africa generally do not appear to be institutionalizing.
AsonguSA (2015) Institutional benchmarking of foreign aid effectiveness in Africa. International Journal of Social Economics42(6): 543–565.
2.
BeckNKatzJ (1995) What to do (and not to do) with time-series cross-section data. American Political Science Review89(3): 634–647.
3.
BernhardMKarakocE (2011) Moving west or going south? Economic transformation and institutionalization in post-communist party systems. Comparative Politics44(1): 1–20.
4.
BleckJvan de WalleN (2011) Parties and issues in Francophone West Africa: towards a theory of non-mobilization. Democratization18(5): 1125–1145.
5.
BloomHSPriceD (1975) Voter response to short-run economic conditions: the asymmetric effect of prosperity and recession. American Political Science Review69(4): 1240–1254.
6.
BogaardsM (2008) Dominant party systems and electoral volatility in Africa: a comment on mozaffar and scarritt. Party Politics14(1): 113–130.
7.
BrattonMMattesRGyimah-BoadiE (2005) Public Opinion, Democracy and Market Reform. New York: Cambridge University Press.
8.
BrattonMBhavnaniRChenTH (2012) Voting intentions in Africa: ethnic, economic, or partisan. Commonwealth and Comparative Politics50(1): 27–52.
9.
BrattonMvan de WalleN (1997) Democratic Experiment in Africa. New York: Cambridge University Press.
10.
BrazysSHeaneyPWalshPP (2015) Fertilizer and votes: does strategic economic policy explain the 2009 Malawi election?Electoral Studies39: 39–55.
11.
BriggsR (2015) The influence of aid changes on African election outcomes. International Interactions41(2): 201–25.
12.
BriggsR (2014) Aiding and abetting: project aid and ethnic politics in Kenya. World Development64: 194–205.
13.
BriggsR (2012) Electrifying the base? Aid and incumbent advantage in Ghana. The Journal of Modern African Studies50(4): 603–624.
14.
CheesemanNHinfelaarM (2009) Parties, platforms, and political mobilization: the Zambian presidential election of 2008. African Affairs109(434): 51–76.
15.
ClaggettW (1986) A reexamination of the asymmetry hypothesis: economic expansions, contractions and congressional elections. Western Political Quarterly39(4): 623–633.
16.
DietrichSMahmudMWintersMS (Forthcoming) Foreign aid, foreign policy, and domestic government legitimacy: experimental evidence from Bangladesh. Journal of Politics.
17.
DionneKYHorowitzJ (2016) The political effects of agricultural subsidies in Africa: evidence from Malawi. World Development87: 215–226.
JablonskiRS (2014) How aid targets votes: the impact of electoral incentives on foreign aid distribution. World Politics66(2): 293–330.
24.
KramonE (2016) Electoral handouts as information. World Politics68(3): 454–498.
25.
LaneJErssonS (2007) Party system instability in Europe. Democratization14: 92–110.
26.
LarmerMFraserA (2007) Of cabbages and King Cobra: populist politics and Zambia’s 2006 election. African Affairs106(425): 611–637.
27.
Lewis-BeckMS (1986) Comparative economic voting: Britain, France, Germany, Italy. American Journal of Political Science30(2): 315–346.
28.
LindbergS (2007) Institutionalization of party systems? Stability and fluidity among legislative parties in Africa’s democracies. Government and Opposition42(2): 215–241.
29.
MainwaringSScullyT (1995) Building Democratic Institutions: Party Systems in Latin America. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
30.
MainwaringSZocoE (2007) Political sequences and the stabilization of interparty competition. Party Politics13: 155–178.
31.
MainwaringSGervasoniCEspaña-NajeraA (2016) Extra-and within-system electoral volatility. Party Politics. Epub ahead of print 11 January 2016. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068815625229.
32.
MozaffarSScarrittJR (2005) The puzzle of African party systems. Party Politics11(4): 399–421.
33.
NannestadPPaldamM (1997) The grievance asymmetry revisited: a micro study of economic voting in Denmark, 1986–1992. European Journal of Political Economy13(1): 81–99.
34.
OECD (2017), Net ODA (indicator). doi: 10.1787/33346549-en (Accessed on 08 September 2017)
35.
OnimodeB (1992) A Future for Africa: Beyond the Politics of Adjustment. London: Earthscan Publications.
36.
OrtizDGBéjarS (2013) Participation in IMF-sponsored economic programs and contentious collective action in Latin America, 1980–2007. Conflict Management and Peace Science30(5): 492–515.
37.
PacekARadcliffB (1995) The political economy of competitive elections in the developing world. American Journal of Political Science39: 745–759.
38.
PedersenM (1979) The dynamics of European party systems: Changing patterns of electoral volatility. European Journal of Political Research7(1): 1–26.
39.
PowellENTuckerJA (2014) Revisiting electoral volatility in post-communist countries: new data, new results and new approaches. British Journal of Political Science44(1): 123–147.
40.
RaknerLvan de WalleN (2009) Opposition weakness in Africa. Journal of democracy20(3): 108–121.
41.
RobertsA (2008) Hyperaccountability: economic voting in Central and Eastern Europe. Electoral Studies27(3): 533–546.
42.
RobertsKWibbelsE (1999) Party systems and electoral volatility in Latin America. American Political Science Review93: 575–590.
43.
RobbinsJW (2010) Party system institutionalization and government spending. Comparative Politics42(2): 229–248.
44.
RoseRMishlerW (2010) A supply-demand model of party-system institutionalization: the Russian case. Party Politics16(6): 801–821.
45.
StimsonJ (1985) Regression in time and space: a statistical essay. American Journal of Political Science29: 914–947.
46.
TavitsM (2008) Party systems in the making: the emergence and success of new parties in new democracies. British Journal of Political Science38(1): 113–133.
47.
TavitsM (2005) The development of stable party support: electoral dynamics in post-communist Europe. American Journal of Political Science49: 283–298.
48.
TumanJP (1994) Organized labor under military rule: the Nigerian labor movement, 1985–1992. Studies in Comparative International Development29: 26–44.
49.
van de WalleN (2001) African Economies and the Politics of Permanent Crisis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
50.
WeghorstKRBernhardM (2014) From formlessness to structure? The institutionalization of competitive party systems in Africa. Comparative Political Studies47(12): 1707–1737.
51.
WeghorstKRLindbergSI (2013) What drives the Swing Voter in Africa?American Journal of Political Science57(3): 717–734.
52.
WeghorstKLindbergS (2011) Effective opposition strategies: collective goods or clientelism?Democratization18(5): 1193–1214.
53.
YanguasPBukenyaB (2016) ‘“New” approaches confront “old” challenges in African public sector reform. Third World Quarterly37(1): 136–152.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
