Scholars have emphasized the decline of party membership and a decrease in party activism. Yet these general patterns hide a diversity of party members with distinct profiles, attitudes and behavior. Using Portugal as a case study, this article examines the heterogeneity of party members based on the different motivations for joining the party and distinct levels of involvement. The findings support previous typologies that distinguished between more activist versus more passive party members. The results also suggest that different party types present a distinct proportion of the two types of affiliates. In addition, these two types of members display distinct levels of ideological congruence with the party.
BelchiorAMFreireA (2013) Is party type relevant to an explanation of policy congruence? Catch-all versus ideological parties in the Portuguese case. International Political Science Review34(3): 273–288.
2.
BruterMHarrisonS (2009) Tomorrow’s leaders? Understanding the involvement of young party members in six European democracies. Comparative Political Studies42(10): 1259–1290.
3.
CancelaJDiasALLisiM (2016) The impact of endorsements in intra-party elections: evidence from open primaries in a new Portuguese party. Politics37(2): 167–183.
4.
ClarkPBWilsonJQ (1961) Incentive systems: a theory of organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly6(2): 129–166.
5.
CoelhoM (2014) Os Partidos Políticos e o Recrutamento do Pessoal Dirigente Em Portugal: O Caso do PS e do PPD, PSD. Lisboa: Europress.
6.
CrossWYoungL (2002) Policy attitudes of party members in Canada: evidence of ideological politics. Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue canadienne de science politique35(4): 859–880.
7.
CrossWYoungL (2004) The contours of political party membership in Canada. Party Politics10(4): 427–444.
8.
DaltonRJMcAllisterIWattenbergMP (2000) The consequences of partisan dealignment. In: DaltonRJWattenbergMP (eds) Parties Without Partisans: Political Change in Advanced Industrial Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 37–63.
9.
DuvergerM (1981) Les Partis Politiques. Paris: Colin.
10.
Espírito SantoPLisiM (2014). Filiados e delegados dos partidos: Portugal em perspetiva comparada. Base de dados [Party Members and Delegates. Portugal from a Comparative Perspective. Dataset]. Lisboa: ISCSP-UL and FCSH-UNL.
11.
FreireALisiM (2016) The Portuguese radical left and the great recession: old challenges and new responses. In: MarchLKeithD (eds), Europe’s Radical Left. From Marginality to Mainstream?London: Rowman & Littlefield, pp. 253–272.
12.
GallagherMMarshM (2004) Party membership in Ireland the members of fine Gael. Party Politics10(4): 407–425.
13.
GaujaA (2015) The construction of party membership. European Journal of Political Research54(2): 232–248.
14.
GibsonRK (2015) Party change, social media and the rise of ‘citizen-initiated’ campaigning. Party Politics21(2): 183–197.
15.
HeidarK (2006) Party membership and participation. In: KatzRSCrottyWJ (eds) Handbook of Party Politics. London: Sage, pp. 301–315.
16.
JalaliC (2006) The woes of being in opposition: the PSD since 1995. South European Society and Politics11(3–4): 359–379.
17.
KatzRS (1990) Party as linkage: a vestigial function?European Journal of Political Research18(1): 143–161.
KennedyFLyonsPFitzgeraldP (2006) Pragmatists, ideologues and the general law of curvilinear disparity: the case of the Irish labour party. Political Studies54(4): 786–805.
20.
KitscheltH (2006) Movement parties. In: KatzRSCrottyWJ (eds) Handbook of party politics. London: Sage, pp. 278–290.
21.
KriegelA (1968) Les Communistes Français, Essai d’ethnographie Politique. Paris: Éditions du Seuil.
22.
KöllnAKPolkJ (2017) Emancipated party members. Party Politics23(1): 18–29.
23.
LisiM (2010) The democratisation of party leadership selection: the Portuguese experience. Portuguese Journal of Social Science9(2): 127–149.
24.
LisiM (2015a) Democracia intra-partidária, filiados e elites intermédias: o caso do partido socialista português. Análise Social50(214): 160–190.
25.
LisiM (2015b) Party Change, Recent Democracies, and Portugal: Comparative Perspectives. Lanham, Maryland: Lexington Books.
26.
LisiMFreireA (2014) The selection of party leaders in Portugal. In: PiletJBCrossWP (eds) The Selection of Political Party Leaders in Contemporary Parliamentary Democracies: A Comparative Study. London: Routledge, pp. 124–140.
27.
LopesFF (2004) Os Partidos Políticos: Modelos e Realidades na Europa Ocidental e em Portugal. Oeiras: Celta Editora.
28.
MayJD (1973) Opinion structure of political parties: the special law of curvilinear disparity. Political Studies21(2): 135–151.
29.
MichelsR (1968) Political Parties; A Sociological Study of the Oligarchical Tendencies of Modern Democracy. New York: Free Press.
30.
MooiESarstedtM (2011) A Concise Guide to Market Research: The Process, Data, and Methods using IBM SPSS Statistics. Heidelberg; New York: Springer.
31.
NarudHMSkareA (1999) Are party activists the party extremists? The structure of opinion in political parties. Scandinavian Political Studies22(1): 45–65.
32.
NiedermayerO (1986) Methodological and political problems of comparative party elites research: the EPPMLE project. European Journal of Political Research14(1–2): 253–258.
33.
PedersenKBilleLBuchR. (2004) Sleeping or active partners? Danish party members at the turn of the millennium. Party Politics10(4): 367–383.
34.
PierreJ (1986) Attitudes and Behaviour of Party Activists: A Critical Examination of Recent Research on Party Activists and ‘Middle-Level’ Elites. European Journal of Political Research14(4): 465–479.
35.
PoguntkeT (2006) Political parties and other organizations. In: KatzRSCrottyWJ (eds) Handbook of party politics. London: Sage, pp. 396–405.
36.
PoguntkeTWebbP (2005) The Presidentialization of Politics: A Comparative Study of Modern Democracies. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.
37.
ReynoldsAPRichardsGDe la IglesiaB. (2006) Clustering rules: a comparison of partitioning and hierarchical clustering algorithms. Journal of Mathematical Modelling and Algorithms5(4): 475–504.
38.
SanchesERRazzuoliI (2017) A Democracia Intrapartidária em Portugal: Uma Análise Comparada Das Perceções Dos Filiados Do BE, CDS-PP, LIVRE, PS E PSD. In: LisiMSantoPE (eds) Militantes e Ativismo Nos Partidos Políticos. Portugal em Perspetiva Comparada. Lisboa: Imprensa de Ciências Sociais, pp. 187–212.
39.
ScarrowSE (1994) The ‘paradox of Enrollment’: Assessing the Costs and Benefits of Party Memberships. European Journal of Political Research25(1): 41–60.
40.
ScarrowSE (1996) Parties and Their Members: Organizing for Victory in Britain and Germany. New York: Oxford University Press.
41.
ScarrowSE (2005) Political Parties and Democracy in Theoretical and Practical Perspectives Implementing Intra-Party Democracy. Washington, DC: National Democratic Institute for International Affairs.
42.
ScarrowSE (2015) Beyond Party Members: Changing Approaches to Partisan Mobilization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
43.
SeydPWhiteleyP (1992) Labour’s Grass Roots: The Politics of Party Membership. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
44.
SubileauF (1981) Le militantisme dans les partis politiques sous la cinquième république: État des travaux de langue française. Revue française de science politique31(5): 1038–1068.
45.
van BiezenIPoguntkeT (2014) The decline of membership-based politics. Party Politics20(2): 205–216.
46.
van BiezenIMairPPoguntkeT (2012) Going, going…gone? The decline of party membership in contemporary Europe. European Journal of Political Research51(1): 24–56.
47.
van HauteE (2009) Adhérer a Un Parti. Bruxelles: Editions de l’Université de Bruxelles.
48.
van HauteECartyRK (2012) Ideological misfits: a distinctive class of party members. Party Politics18(6): 885–895.
49.
van HauteEGaujaA (2015) Party Members and Activists. Abingdon: Routledge.
50.
WareA (1996) Political parties and party systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
51.
WhiteleyPSeydP (2002) High-Intensity Participation: The Dynamics of Party Activism in Britain. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
52.
WhiteleyPSeydPRichardsonJJ (1994) True Blues: The Politics of Conservative Party membership. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
