This article explores the political foundations of ethnic security fears and examines the relationship between the structure of party competition at the constituency level and security fears at the individual level in Uttar Pradesh, India’s largest state. The analysis shows that security fears are higher in constituencies characterised by multiparty competition. The central implication of this finding is that rather than leading to ethnic moderation, multiparty competition in ethnic party systems tends to be more ethnically divisive than in two party systems, increasing collective fears of the future.
AppaduraiA (1998) Dead certainty: Ethnic violence in the era of globalization. Journal of the International Centre for Ethnic Studies2(2): 1–32.
2.
BrassP (2003) The Production of Hindu–Muslim Violence in Contemporary India. Seattle: University of Washington Press.
3.
ChandraK (2004) Why Ethnic Parties Succeed: Patronage and Ethnic Hounds Counts in India. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
4.
ChandraK (2005) Ethnic parties and democratic stability. Perspectives on Politics3(2): 235–252.
5.
ChhibberPMuraliG (2006) Duvergerian dynamics in the Indian states: Federalism and the number of parties in the State Assembly elections. Party Politics12(1): 5–34.
6.
ChhibberPNooruddinI (2004) Do party systems count? The number of parties and government performance in the Indian states. Comparative Political Studies37(2): 152–187.
7.
DiwakarR (2007) Duverger’s law and the size of the Indian party system. Party Politics13(5): 539–561.
8.
EifertBMiguelEPosnerDN (2010) Political competition and ethnic identification in Africa. American Journal of Political Science54(2): 494–510.
9.
EllingsenT (2000) Colorful community or ethnic witches’ brew? Multiethnicity and domestic conflict during and after the Cold War. Journal of Conflict Resolution44(2): 228–249.
10.
FishMSBrooksRS (2004) Does diversity hurt democracy?Journal of Democracy15(1): 154–167.
11.
HansenTB (2001) Wages of Violence: Naming and Identity in Postcolonial Bombay. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
12.
HeathAYadavY (1999) The united colours of Congress: The social profile of Congress voters, 1996 and 1998. Economic and Political Weekly34(34–35): 2518–2528.
13.
HeathO (1999) The BJP’s rise to power: Social, regional and political expansion in the 1990s. Economic and Political Weekly34(34–35): 2511–2517.
14.
HorowitzDL (2000) Ethnic Groups in Conflict. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
15.
HorowitzDL (2004) The alternative vote and interethnic moderation: A reply to Fraenkel & Grofman. Public Choice121: 507–516.
16.
HuberJSuryanarayanP (2013) Ethnic inequality and the ethnification of political parties: Evidence from India. Unpublished manuscript.
17.
KaufmannC (1996) Possible and impossible solutions to ethnic civil wars. International Security20(4): 136–175.
18.
LakeDARothchildDA (1998) Spreading fear: The genesis of transnational ethnic conflict. In: LakeDARothchildDS (eds) The International Spread of Ethnic Conflict: Fear, Diffusion, and Escalation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, pp. 3–32.
MedskerGWilliamsLHolahanP (1994) A review of current practices for evaluating causal models in organizational behavior and human resources management research. Journal of Management20(2): 439–464.
21.
MicheluttiL (2008) The Vernacularisation of Democracy: Politics, Caste, and Religion in India. Delhi: Routledge.
22.
MicheluttiLHeathO (2013) The politics of entitlement: Affirmative action and strategic voting in Uttar Pradesh, India. Focaal - Journal of Global and Historical Anthropology65: 56–67.
23.
NandyATrivedySMayaramS. (1995) Creating a Nationality: The Ramjanmabhumi Movement and Fear of the Self. Delhi: Oxford University Press.
24.
PiazzaJ (2010) Terrorism and Party systems in the States of India. Security Studies19(1): 99–123.
25.
PosenB (1993) The security dilemma and ethnic conflict. Survival35(1): 27–47.
26.
PosnerDN (2004) The political salience of cultural difference: Why Chewas and Tumbukas are allies in Zambia and adversaries in Malawi. American Political Science Review98(4): 529–545.
27.
PutnamR (2007) E Pluribus Unum: Diversity and community in the twenty-first century. The 2006 Johan Skytte Prize Lecture. Scandinavian Political Studies30(2): 137–174.
28.
ReillyB (2001) Democracy in Divided Societies: Electoral Engineering for Conflict Management. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
29.
SaidemanSLanoueDCampenniM. (2002) Democratization, political institutions and ethnic conflict: A pooled time-series analysis, 1985-1998. Comparative Political Studies35(1): 103–129.
30.
SelwayJTemplemanK (2012) The myth of consociationalism? Conflict reduction in divided societies. Comparative Political Studies45(12) 1542–1571.
