In this article, we test the effects of interest group endorsements on potential voters in the 2008 presidential election. Specifically, we use a posttest-only, multiple control group experiment (N = 701) to examine how real-world endorsements affect citizens. We find that endorsements have profound effects on some voters. Specifically, we find that interest-group endorsements profoundly affect the candidate evaluations and stated voting preferences of potential voters who are what we call ‘poorly aligned’ – that is, whose stand on the issue on which the endorsement is based (in this case, abortion) does not align ‘properly’ with their party identification and ideology. Moreover, we find that the effects of endorsements are most profound among poorly aligned voters who are not well informed. In all, our results confirm that interest-group endorsements indeed act as cues for voters, even in high-information elections.
ArceneauxKKolodnyR (2009) Educating the least informed: Group endorsements in a grassroots campaign. American Journal of Political Science53: 755–770.
2.
AsherHBHeberligESRipleyRBSnyderK (2001) American Labor Unions in the Electoral Arena. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
3.
BafumiJShapiroRY (2009) A new partisan voter. Journal of Politics71: 1–24.
4.
BestSJHubbardC (1999) Maximizing ‘minimal effects’: The impact of early primary season debates on voter preferences. American Politics Research27: 450–467.
5.
BradyHESnidermanPM (1985) Attitude attribution: A group basis for political reasoning. American Political Science Review79: 1061–1078.
CampbellAConversePMillerWEStokesDE (1960) The American Voter. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
8.
ChaikenSLibermanAEaglyAH (1989) Heuristic and systematic information processing within and beyond the persuasion context. In: UlemanJSBarghJA (eds) Unintended Thought. New York: Guilford Press, pp. 212–252.
9.
ClarkPMastersMF (2001) Competing interest groups and union members’ voting. Social Science Quarterly82: 105–116.
10.
ConverseP (1964) The nature of belief systems in mass publics. In: ApterDE (ed.) Ideology and Discontent. New York: Free Press of Glencoe, pp. 206–261.
11.
DelaneyJTMastersMFSchwochauS (1990) Union membership and voting for COPE endorsed candidates. Industrial and Labor Relations Review43: 621–635.
12.
Delli-CarpiniMXKeeterS (1996) What Americans Know About Politics and Why It Matters. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
13.
DownsA (1957) An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper and Row.
14.
DruckmanJNKamCD (2011) Students as experimental participants: A defense of the ‘narrow data base’. In: DruckmanJNGreenDPKuklinskiJHLupiaA (eds) The Cambridge Handbook of Experimental Political Science. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 41–57.
15.
FeldmanSJohnston ConoverP (1983) Candidates, issues, and voters: The role of inference in political perception. Journal of Politics45: 810–839.
16.
GerberERPhillipsJH (2003) Development ballot measures, interest group endorsements, and the political geography of growth preferences. American Journal of Political Science47: 625–639.
17.
HillTG (2003) Interest-ing Candidates: The Electoral Impact of Interest Group Endorsements. Doctoral dissertation at the Ohio State University.
18.
HojnackiMBaumL (1992) ‘New-style’ judicial campaigns and the voters: Economic issues and union members in Ohio. Western Political Quarterly45: 921–948.
19.
JuravichTShergoldPR (1988) The impact of unions on the voting behavior of their members. Industrial and Labor Relations Review41: 374–385.
20.
KinderDRPalfreyTR (1993) On behalf of an experimental political science. In: KinderDRPalfreyTR (eds) Experimental Foundations of Political Science. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, pp. 1–39.
21.
KingGTomzMWittenbergJ (2000) Making the most of statistical analyses: Improving interpretation and presentation. American Journal of Political Science44: 347–361.
22.
KochJW (2000) Do citizens apply gender stereotypes to infer candidates’ ideological orientations?Journal of Politics62: 414–429.
23.
KühbergerA (1998) The influence of framing on risky decisions: A meta-analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 75: 23–55.
24.
LupiaA (1994) Shortcuts versus encyclopedias: Information and voting behavior in California insurance reform elections. American Political Science Review88: 63–76.
25.
McDermottML (1997) Voting cues in low information elections: Candidate gender as a social information variable in contemporary United States elections. American Journal of Political Science41: 270–283.
26.
McDermottML (1998) Race and gender cues in low-information elections. Political Research Quarterly51: 895–918.
27.
McDermottML (2006) Not for members only: Group endorsements as electoral information cues. Political Research Quarterly59: 249–257.
28.
PattonDBMarroneJJ (1984) The impact of labor endorsements: Union members and the 1980 Presidential vote. Labor Studies Journal9: 3–18.
29.
PopkinSL (1991) The Reasoning Voter: Communications and Persuasion in Presidential Campaigns. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
30.
RahnWM (1993) The role of partisan stereotypes in information processing about political candidates. American Journal of Political Science37: 472–496.
31.
RapoportRBStoneWJAbramowitzAI (1991) Do endorsements matter? Group influence in the 1984 Democratic caucuses. American Political Science Review85: 193–203.
32.
RiggleEDOttatiVCWyerRSKuklinskiJSchwarzN (1992) Bases of political judgments: The role of stereotypic and nonstereotypic information. Political Behavior14: 67–87.
33.
ShadishWRCookTDCampbellDT (2001) Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Generalized Causal Inference. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Company.
34.
SnidermanPMBrodyRATetlockPE (1991) Reasoning and Choice: Explorations in Political Psychology. New York: Cambridge University Press.
35.
TomzMWittenbergJKingG (2003) CLARIFY: Software for Interpreting and Presenting Statistical Results, Version 2.1. Stanford University, University of Wisconsin, and Harvard University. Available at:http://gking.harvard.edu(accessed 21 May 2008).
36.
WlezienCMillerAH (1997) Social groups and political judgments. Social Science Quarterly78: 625–640.
37.
ZallerJ (1992) The Nature and Origins of Mass Public Opinion. New York: Cambridge University Press.
