Several recent articles have reached different conclusions regarding the impact of the religious–secular cleavage in Chile. The resolution of this debate has important consequences for the understanding of cleavages. Studies subscribing to the view that parties have considerable agency in the maintenance of cleavages have found that religiosity no longer affects vote choice, while studies rooted in a sociological perspective argue that religiosity still matters. We show that the reason for the discrepant results is because a partisan realignment is underway, whereby religious voters are gradually shifting their loyalties from the parties of the left to the parties of the right, matching a division that has taken place at the elite level. These results are consistent with an issue evolution perspective, which provides a clearer articulation of how cleavages form than either the agency or the sociological approaches.
AdamsGD (1997) Abortion: Evidence of issue evolution. American Journal of Political Science41: 718–737.
2.
AlvarezRMKatzG (2009) A Bayesian multinomial probit analysis of voter choice in Chile's 2005 presidential election. Electoral Studies28: 177–189.
3.
BartoliniS (2000) The Political Mobilization of the European Left, 1860–1980. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
4.
BartoliniSMairP (1990) Identity, Competition, and Electoral Availability: The Stabilisation of European Electorates, 1885–1985. New York: Cambridge University Press.
5.
BonillaCACarlinRELoveGJMéndezES (2011) Social or political cleavages? A spatial analysis of the party system in post-authoritarian Chile. Public Choice146: 9–21.
DaltonRJ (2006) Citizen Politics: Public Opinion and Political Parties in Advanced Industrial Democracies. Washington, D.C.: CQ Press.
14.
DixRH (1989) Cleavage structures and party systems in Latin America. Comparative Politics22: 23–37.
15.
EnyediZ (2005) The role of agency in cleavage formation. European Journal of Political Research44: 697–720.
16.
GuzmánVSeibertUStaabS (2010) Democracy in the country but not in the home? Religion, politics, and women’s rights in Chile. Third World Quarterly31: 971–988.
17.
HuneeusC (2003) A highly institutionalized political party: Christian democracy in Chile. In: MainwaringSScullyTR (eds) Christian Democracy in Latin America: Electoral Competition and Regime Conflicts. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, pp. 121–161.
18.
KnutsenOScarbroughE (1995) Cleavage politics. In: van DethJScarbroughE (eds) The Impact of Values. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 492–523.
19.
KriesiH (1998) The transformation of cleavage politics: The 1997 Stein Rokkan lecture. European Journal of Political Research33: 165–185.
20.
LaPalombaraJWeinerM (1966) The origin and development of political parties. In: LaPalombaraJWeinerM (eds) Political Parties and Political Development. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, pp. 3–42.
21.
LaymanGCCarseyTM (2002) Party polarization and conflict extension in the American electorate. American Journal of Political Science46: 786–802.
22.
Lewis-BeckMJacobyWGNorpothHWeisbergHF (2008) The American Voter Revisited. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
23.
LipsetSM (1960) Political Man: The Social Bases of Politics. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
24.
LipsetSMRokkanS (1967) Cleavage structures, party systems, and voter alignments: An introduction. In: LipsetSMRokkanS (eds) Party Systems and Voter Alignments: Cross-National Perspectives. New York: Free Press, pp. 1–64.
25.
LongJSFreeseJ (2006) Regression Models for Categorical Dependent Variables Using Stata. College Station, TX: Stata Press.
26.
MainwaringSScullyTR (1995) Building Democratic Institutions: Party Systems in Latin America. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
27.
PrzeworskiASpragueJ (1986) Paper Stones: A History of Electoral Socialism. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
28.
RokkanS (1970) Citizens, Elections, and Parties. New York: Universitetsforlaget–McKay.
29.
RoseR (ed.) (1974) Electoral Behavior: A Comparative Handbook. New York: Free Press.
30.
SartoriG (1969) From the sociology of politics to political sociology. In: LipsetSM (ed.) Politics and the Social Sciences. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 65–100.
31.
SchattschneiderEE (1960) The Semi-Sovereign People: A Realist’s View of Democracy in America. Hinsdale, IL: Dryden.
32.
ScullyTR (1992) Rethinking the Center: Party Politics in the Nineteenth and Twentieth-Century Chile. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
33.
ScullyTR (1995) Reconstituting party politics in Chile. In: MainwaringSScullyTR (eds) Building Democratic Institutions: Party Systems in Latin America. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, pp. 100–137.
34.
ShepardB (2000) The ‘double discourse’ on sexual and reproductive rights in Latin America: The chasm between public policy and private actions. Health and Human Rights4: 110–143.
35.
SundquistJL (1983) Dynamics of the Party System: Alignment and Realignment of Political Parties in the United States. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institute.
36.
TironiE (2002) El Cambio está Aquí. Santiago: Random House Mondadori.
37.
TironiEAgüeroF (1999) ¹Sobrevivirá el Nuevo Paisaje Político Chileno?Estudios Públicos74: 151–168.
38.
TorcalMMainwaringS (2003) The political recrafting of social bases of party competition: Chile, 1973–95. British Journal of Political Science33: 55–84.
39.
ValenzuelaJS (1997) The origins and transformations of the Chilean party system. In: DevotoFJDi TellaTS (eds) Political Culture, Social Movements and Democratic Transitions in South America in the XXth Century. Milano: Feltrinelli Editore, pp. 47–100.
40.
ValenzuelaJSScullyTRSommaN (2007) The enduring presence of religion in Chilean ideological positionings and voter options. Comparative Politics40: 1–20.
41.
WalkerC (2003) The future of Chilean Christian Democracy. In: MainwaringSScullyTR (eds) Christian Democracy in Latin America: Electoral Competition and Regime Conflicts. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, pp. 162–195.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
