The literature is still undecided on whether sub-state elections conform more to a national or regional logic of voting. In this article, I argue that the impact of national politics on regional elections is contingent upon the level of decentralization. I hypothesize that the greater the number of policy areas and resources in the hands of regional governments, the lesser the influence of national coat-tails on regional elections. Using the electoral results of the Spanish Socialist Party in national and regional elections from 1979 to 2009, the empirical analysis shows that regional politicians’ electoral performance is correlated to that of their national counterparts. However, this correlation has weakened as regional governments have gained greater decision-making and financing powers. This has been particularly evident in elections when the regional branch of the party rules a single-party government and competes against strong regionalist parties.
AlonsoSBraulioG (2010) Partidos Nacionales En Elecciones Regionales: Coherencia Territorial O Programas a La Carta?Revista de Estudios Políticos152.
2.
AjaE (2003) El Estado Autonómico. Federalismo Y Hechos Diferenciales. Madrid: Alianza Ensayo.
3.
AndersonCJWardDS (1996) Barometer elections in comparative perspective. Electoral Studies15: 447–60.
4.
AndersonCD (2006a) Attributions of responsibility for economic conditions in multilevel states: The case of Canada. Mimeo, Toronto Annual Meetings of the Canadian Political Science Association.
5.
AndersonCD (2006b) Economic voting and multilevel governance: A comparative individual-level analysis. American Journal of Political Science50: 449–463.
6.
AndersonCD (2008) Economic voting, multilevel governance and information in Canada. Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue canadienne de science politique41: 329–354.
7.
AtkesonLRPartinRW (1995) Economic and referendum voting: A comparison of gubernatorial and senatorial elections. American Political Science Review89: 99–107.
8.
BednarJEskridgeWNJrFerejohnJ (2001) A political theory of federalism. In: FerejohnJRakoveJNRileyJ (eds) Constitutional Culture and Democratic Rule. New York: Cambridge University Press.
9.
BeramendiPMáizR (2004) Spain: Unfulfilled federalism. In: AmorettiUBermeoN (eds) Federalism, Unitarism, and Territorial Cleavages. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
10.
BradburyJ (2009) Devolution and party organization in the UK: Statewide parties and statewide-regional branch relations over candidate selection in Scotland and Wales. In: SwendenWMaddensB (eds) Territorial Party Politics in Western Europe. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
11.
BrancatiD (2006) Decentralization: Fueling the fire or dampening the flames of ethnic conflict and secessionism?International Organization (July): 651–685.
12.
BrennanGBuchananJM (1980) The Power to Tax: Analytical Foundations of a Fiscal Constitution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
13.
CaramaniD (2004) The Nationalization of Politics: The Formation of National Electorates and Party Systems in Western Europe. Cambridgeand New York: Cambridge University Press.
14.
CarseyTMWrightGC (1998) State and national factors in gubernatorial and senatorial elections. American Journal of Political Science42: 994–1002.
15.
ChhibberPKKollmanK (2004) The Formation of National Party Systems: Federalism and Party Competition in Canada, Great Britain, India, and the United States. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
16.
CutlerF (2008) Whodunnit? Voters and responsibility in Canadian Federalism. Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue canadienne de science politique41: 627–654.
17.
DetterbeckKJefferyC (2009) Rediscovering the region: Territorial politics and party organizations in Germany. In: SwendenWMaddensB (eds) Territorial Party Politics in Western Europe. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
18.
FabreE (2011) Measuring Party Organization: The Vertical Dimension of the Multi-Level Organization of State-Wide Parties in Spain and the UK. Party Politics17: 343–63.
19.
FabreEMéndez-LagoM (2009) Decentralization and party organizational change: The British and Spanish statewide parties compared. In: SwendenWMaddensB (eds) Territorial Party Politics in Western Europe. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
20.
FilippovMOrdeshookPCShvetsovaO (2004) Designing Federalism: A Theory of Self-Sustainable Federal Institutions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
21.
GarmanCHaggardSWillisE (2001) Fiscal decentralization: A political theory with Latin American cases. World Politics53: 205–236.
22.
GélineauFBélangerÉ (2005) Electoral accountability in a federal system: National and provincial economic voting in Canada. Publius: The Journal of Federalism35: 407–424.
23.
GélineauFRemmerKL (2006) Political decentralization and electoral accountability: The Argentine experience, 1983–2001. British Journal of Political Science36: 133–157.
24.
HansenSB (1999) ‘Life is not fair': Governors' job performance ratings and state economies. Political Research Quarterly52: 167–188.
25.
HoogheLMarksGSchakelAH (2008) Regional authority in 42 countries, 1950–2006: A measure and five hypotheses. Regional & Federal Studies18.
26.
HoogheLMarksGSchakelAH (2010) The Rise of Regional Authority: A Comparative Study of 42 Democracies (1950–2006). London: Routledge.
27.
HopkinJ (2009a) Decentralization and Party organizational change: The case of Italy. In: SwendenWMaddensB (eds) Territorial Party Politics in Western Europe. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
28.
HopkinJ (2009b) Party matters: Devolution and party politics in Britain and Spain. Party Politics15: 178–198.
29.
HopkinJvan HoutenP (2009) Decentralization and State-Wide Parties: Introduction. Party Politics15: 131–135.
30.
HoughDJefferyC (2006) Germany: An erosion of federal-Länder linkages? In: HoughDJefferyC (eds) Devolution and Electoral Politics. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
31.
HoughDKobM (2009) Territory and electoral politics in Germany. In: SwendenWMaddensB (eds) Territorial Party Politics in Western Europe. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
32.
InmanRPRubinfeldDL (1997) The Political Economy of Federalism. In: MuellerDC (eds) Perspectives of Public Choice. Cambridge University Press.
33.
JefferyCHoughD (2009) Understanding post-devolution elections in Scotland and Wales in comparative perspective. Party Politics15: 219–240.
34.
JonesMPMainwaringS (2003) The nationalization of parties and party systems. Party Politics9: 139–166.
35.
JonesMPSanguinettiPTommasiM (2000) Politics, institutions, and fiscal performance in a federal system: An analysis of the Argentine provinces. Journal of Development Economics61: 305–333.
36.
KingJD (2001) Incumbent popularity and vote choice in gubernatorial elections. Journal of Politics63: 585–597.
37.
Lago-PeñasILago-PeñasS (2011) Decentralization and the nationalization of party systems. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy29: 244–263.
38.
LeónS (2010) Who is responsible for what? Clarity of responsibilities in multilevel states: The case of Spain. European Journal of Political Research50(1): 80–109.
39.
León-AlfonsoS (2007) The Political Economy of Fiscal Decentralization: Bringing Politics to the Study of Intergovermental Transfers. Barcelona: Generalitat de Catalunya, Institut d'Estudis Autonòmics.
40.
LowryRCAltJEFerreeKE (1998) Fiscal policy outcomes and electoral accountability in American states. American Political Science Review92: 759–774.
41.
MaddensBLibbrechtl (2009) How Statewide parties cope with the regionalist issue: The case of Spain. In: SwendenWMaddensB (eds) Territorial Party Politics in Western Europe. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
42.
MazzoleniM (2009) The saliency of regionalization in party systems. Party Politics15: 199–218.
43.
McLeanIHeathATaylorB (1996) Were the 1994 Euro- and local elections in Britain really second order? Evidence from the British election panel study. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion & Parties6: 1–20.
44.
Méndez LagoM (2000) La estrategia organizativa del Partido Socialista Obrero Español. Madrid: Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas.
45.
MusgraveRA (1959) The Theory of Public Finance: A Study in Public Economy. New York: McGraw-Hill.
46.
NiemiRGStanleyHWVogelRJ (1995) State economies and state taxes: Do voters hold governors accountable?American Journal of Political Science39: 936–957.
47.
OatesWE (1972) Fiscal Federalism. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
48.
PallarésFKeatingM (2006) Multi-level electoral competition: Sub-state elections and party systems in Spain. In: HoughDJefferyC (eds) Devolution and Electoral Politics. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
49.
PartinRW (1995) Economic conditions and gubernatorial elections. American Politics Research23: 81–95.
50.
QianYWeingastBR (1997) Federalism as a commitment to preserving market incentives. Journal of Economic Perspectives11: 83–92.
51.
ReifKSchmittH (1980) Nine second-order national elections: A conceptual framework for the analysis of European election results. European Journal of Political Research8: 3–44.
52.
RemmerKLGélineauF (2003) Subnational electoral choice: Economic and referendum voting in Argentina, 1983–1999. Comparative Political Studies36: 801–821.
53.
RoddenJ (2004) Comparative federalism and decentralization: On meaning and measurement. Comparative Politics36: 481–500.
54.
RoddenJ (2006) Hamilton's Paradox: The Promise and Peril of Fiscal Federalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
55.
RoddenJWibbelsE (2002) Beyond the fiction of federalism: Macroeconomic management in multitiered systems. World Politics54(4): 494–531.
56.
RoddenJWibbelsE (2010) Dual accountability and the nationalization of party competition: Evidence from four federations. Party Politics17(5): 629–653.
57.
RudolphTJ (2003a) Who's responsible for the economy? The formation and consequences of responsibility attributions. American Journal of Political Science47: 698–713.
58.
RudolphTJ (2003b) Institutional context and the assignment of political responsibility. Journal of Politics65: 190–215.
59.
SimonDM (1989) Presidents, governors, and electoral accountability. Journal of Politics51: 286–304.
60.
SquirePFastnowC (1994) Comparing gubernatorial and senatorial elections. Political Research Quarterly47: 705–720.
61.
StefuriucI (2009) Governing strategies in multilevel settings: Coordination, innovation or territorialization? In: SwendenWMaddensB (eds) Territorial Party Politics in Western Europe. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
62.
SteinRM (1990) Economic voting for governor and U.S. senator: The electoral consequences of federalism. Journal of Politics52: 29–53.
63.
SvobodaCJ (1995) Retrospective voting in gubernatorial elections: 1982 and 1986. Political Research Quarterly48: 135–150.
64.
SwendenWMaddensB (2009) Territorial Party Politics in Western Europe. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
65.
ThorlaksonL (2009) Patterns of party integration, influence and autonomy in seven federations. Party Politics15: 157–177.
66.
WeingastBR (1995) The economic role of political institutions: Market preserving federalism and economic development. Journal of Law, Economics and Organization11: 1–31.
67.
WillisEGarmanCHaggardS (1999) The politics of decentralization in Latin America. Latin American Research Review34: 7–56.
