Despite its theoretical relevance, the role played by the existence of a core party in explaining the partisan composition of governments represents an understudied area in the empirical research on coalition formations. This article addresses the gap in the literature by focusing on the Italian case between 1946–1993. The role of the core party not only finds corroboration in the data, but it also clarifies the role played by political inertia. In this sense, the nature of the cabinet-bargaining process appears to be qualitatively different when a core party is present. Beyond better accounting for the patterns of government formation, our results help to identify the necessary (spatial) conditions under which the cycle of a government formula can be expected to be broken.
AxelrodR.M. (1970) Conflict of Interest. Chicago: Markham.
2.
AxelrodR.M. (1984) The Evolution of Cooperation. New York: Basic Books.
3.
BäckH.DumontP. (2007) ‘Combining Large-n and Small-n Strategies: The Way Forward in Coalition Research’, West European Politics30: 467–501.
4.
BarnesS.H. (1977) Representation in Italy: Instituzionalized Tradition and Electoral Choice. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
5.
BenoitK.LaverM. (2006) Party Policy in Modern Democracies. New York: Routledge.
6.
BudgeI.KlingemannH.VolkensA.BaraJ.TanenbaumE. (2001) Mapping Policy Preferences: Estimates for Parties, Electors, and Governments, 1945-1998. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
7.
CottaM. (1996) ‘La crisi del governo di partito all’italiana’, in CottaM.IserniaP. (eds), pp.11–52. Il gigante dai piedi di argilla. Bologna: Il Mulino.
8.
CuriniL. (2011) ‘Government Survival the Italian Way: The Core and the Advantages of Policy Immobilism during the First Republic’, European Journal of Political Research50: 110–142.
9.
CuriniL.MartelliP. (2009) I partiti nella prima repubblica. Roma: Carocci.
10.
CuriniL.MartelliP. (2010) ‘Ideological Proximity and Valence Competition: Negative Campaigning Through Allegation of Corruption in the Italian Legislative Arena from 1946 to 1994’, Electoral Studies16(3): 299–321.
11.
De SwaanA. (1973) Coalition Theories and Cabinet Formation. Elsevier: Amsterdam.
12.
De WinterL.AndewegR.B.DumontP. (2002) ‘The State of the Art in Coalition Research: Critical Appraisals and Alternative Avenues', paper presented at the ECPR Joint Sessions in Turin, 22-27 March.
13.
De WinterL.DumontP. (2006) ‘Parties Into Government: Still Many Puzzles', in KatzR.S.CrottyW. (eds) Handbook of Party Politics. London: Sage.
14.
DebusM. (2008) ‘Office and Policy Payoffs in Coalition Governments', Party Politics14(5): 515–538.
15.
DebusM. (2009) ‘Pre-electoral Commitments and Government Formation’Public Choice138(1): 45–64.
16.
FranklinM.N.MackieT.T. (1983) ‘Familiarity and Inertia in the Formation of Governing Coalitions in Parliamentary Democracies', British Journal of Political Science13(3): 275–298.
17.
GamsonW.A. (1961) ‘A Theory of Coalition Formation’, American Sociological Review26(3): 373–382.
18.
GolderS.N. (2006) The Logic of Pre-electoral Coalition Formation. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press.
19.
KingG.AltJ.BurnsN.LaverM. (1990) ‘A Unified Model of Cabinet Dissolution in Parliamentary Democracies', American Journal of Political Science34(3): 846–871.
20.
KlingemannH.-D.VolkensA.BaraJ.BudgeJ. (2006) Mapping Policy Preference II. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
21.
LaverM.ShepsleK.A. (1996) Making and Breaking Governments. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
22.
LaverM.ShepsleK.A. (1998) ‘Events, Equilibria, and Government Survival’, American Journal of Political Science42(1): 28–54.
23.
LaverM. (1989) ‘Theories of Coalition Formation and Local Government Coalitions', in MellorsC.PijnenburgB. (eds) Political Parties and Coalitions in European Local Government. London: Routledge.
24.
LaverM.SchofieldN. (1990) Multiparty Government: The Politics of Coalition in Europe. New York: Oxford University Press.
25.
LeisersonM. (1968) ‘Factions and Coalitions in One-party Japan: An Interpretation Based on the Theory of Games', The American Political Science Review57: 770–787.
26.
MartinL.W.StevensonR.T. (2001) ‘Government Formation in Parliamentary Democracies', American Journal of Political Science45(1): 33–50.
27.
MartinL.W.StevensonR.T. (2010) ‘The Conditional Impact of Incumbency on Government Formation’, American Political Science Review104(3): 503–518.
28.
MartinL.W.VanbergG. (2003) ‘Wasting Time? The Impact of Ideology and Size on Delay in Coalition Formation’, British Journal of Political Science33(2): 323–332.
29.
McLeanI. (2001) Rational Choice and British Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
30.
MershonC. (1994) ‘Expectations and Informal Rules in Coalition Formation’, Comparative Political Studies27(1): 40–79.
31.
MershonC. (1996) ‘The Costs of Coalition: Coalition Theories and Italian Governments', American Political Science Review90(3): 534–554.
32.
MitchellP.NybladeB. (2008) ‘Government Formation and Cabinet Type’, in StrømK.MüllerW.BergmanT. (eds) Cabinets and Coalition Bargaining. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
33.
MüllerW.C.StrømK. (2000) Coalition Governments in Western Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
34.
PooleK. T. (2005) Spatial Models of Parliamentary Voting. New York: Cambridge University Press.
35.
RikerW.H. (1962) The Theory of Political Coalitions. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
36.
RikerW.H. (1982) Liberalism Against Populism. Long Grove: Waverland Press.
37.
SartoriG. (1976) Parties and Party Systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
38.
SchofieldN. (1993) ‘Political Competition and Multiparty Coalition Governments', European Journal of Political Research23: 1-–3.
39.
SchofieldN. (1995) ‘Coalition Politics: A Formal Model and Empirical Analysis', Journal of Theoretical Politics7: 245–81.
40.
SchofieldN. (2006) Architects of Political Change: Constitutional Quandaries and Social Choice Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
41.
SchofieldN. (2008) The Spatial Model of Politics. London: Routledge.
42.
SchofieldN.SenedI. (2006) Multiparty Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
43.
StrømK. (1990) Minority Government and Majority Rule. New York: Cambridge University Press.
44.
StrømK.BudgeI.LaverM.J. (1994) ‘Constraints on Cabinet Formation in Parliamentary Democracies', American Journal of Political Science38(2): 303–335.
45.
StrømK.MüllerW.C.BergmanT. (2008) Cabinets and Coalition Bargaining: The Democratic Life Cycle in Western Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
46.
TavitsM. (2008) ‘The Role of Parties' Past Behavior in Coalition Formation’, American Political Science Review102(4): 495–507.
47.
TsebelisG. (2002) Veto Players. How Political Institutions Work. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
48.
TsebelisG.ChangE. (2004) Veto Players and the Structure of Budgets in Advanced Industrialized Countries', European Journal of Political Research43(3): 449–476.
49.
Van RoozendaalP. (1992) Cabinets in Multi-party Democracies: The Effect of Dominant and Central Parties on Cabinet Composition and Durability. Amsterdam: Thesis Publishers.
50.
VerzichelliL.CottaM. (2000) ‘Italy: From “constrained” coalitions to alternative governments?’, in MüllerW.C.StrømK. (eds), pp.433–497. Coalition Governments in Western Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
51.
Von NeumannJ.MorgensternO. (1953) Theory of Games and Economic Behaviour. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
52.
WarwickP. (1994) Government Survival in Parliamentary Democracies. New York: Cambridge University Press.
53.
WarwickP.V. (1996) ‘Coalition Government Membership in West European Parliamentary Democracies', British Journal of Political Science26(4): 471–499.
54.
WoldendorpJ.KemanH.BudgeI. (2000) Party Government in 48 Democracies (1945-1998): Composition, Duration, Personnel. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
