Starting from a number of deficiencies in the Comparative Manifestos Project approach to studying left–right policy scales in election programs, an additive model based on the distinction between position and valence issues is proposed. This allows analysis of the policy space in established democracies under the assumption that left and right have different meanings from country to country and over time. The model is illustrated with regard to four Western European countries with different types of party system: Germany, Italy, Sweden and the United Kingdom. Empirical findings affirm that the procedures are workable and that the data generated are capable of yielding detailed information beyond that which previous approaches are able to deliver. In addition, preliminary tests on external validity produce reassuring results.
Adams, James et al. (2004) ‘Understanding Change and Stability in Party Ideologies: Do Parties Respond to Public Opinion or to Past Election Results?’ , British Journal of Political Science34: 589–610 .
2.
Bielasiak, Jack (2002) ‘The Institutionalization of Electoral and Party Systems in Postcommunist States’ , Comparative Politics34: 189–210 .
3.
Budge, Ian (2001) ‘Theory and Measurement of Party Policy Positions’, in Ian Budge et al. (eds) Mapping Policy Preferences. Estimates for Parties, Electors, and Governments 1945–1998, pp. 75–90. Oxford: Oxford University Press .
4.
Budge, Ian and David Robertson (1987) ‘Do Parties Differ and How? Comparative Discriminant and Factor Analyses’, in Ian Budge et al. (eds) Ideology, Strategy and Party Change. Spatial Analyses of Post-War Election Programmes in 19 Democracies, pp. 387–416. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
5.
Budge, Ian et al. (eds) (1987) Ideology, Strategy and Party Change. Spatial Analyses of Post-War Election Programmes in 19 Democracies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
6.
Budge, Ian et al. (eds) (2001) Mapping Policy Preferences. Estimates for Parties, Electors, and Governments1945–1998. Oxford: Oxford University Press .
7.
Budge, Ian and Hans-Dieter Klingemann (2001) ‘Finally! Comparative Over-Time Mapping of Party Policy Movement’, in Ian Budge et al. (eds) Mapping Policy Preferences. Estimates for Parties, Electors, and Governments 1945–1998, pp. 19–50. Oxford: Oxford University Press .
8.
Castles , Francis and Peter Mair (1984) ‘Left–Right Political Scales: Some Expert Judgements’ , European Journal of Political Research12: 73–88 .
9.
Dodd, Lawrence C. (1976) Coalitions in Parliamentary Government. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press .
10.
Enelow, James M. and Melvin J. Hinich (1984) The Spatial Theory of Voting. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
11.
Fuchs, Dieter and Hans-Dieter Klingemann (1990) ‘The Left–Right Schema’, in M. Kent Jennings et al. (eds) Continuities in Political Action. A Longitudinal Study of Political Orientations in Three Western Democracies, pp. 203–234. Berlin and New York: Walter de Gruyter .
12.
Gabel, Matthew and John Huber (2000) ‘Putting Parties in their Place’ , American Journal of Political Science44: 94–103 .
13.
Gallagher, Michael et al. (2001) Representative Government in Modern Europe. Institutions, Parties, and Governments, 3rd edn.New York: McGraw-Hill .
14.
Hazan, Reuven Y. (1997) Centre Parties. Polarization and Competition in European Parliamentary Democracies. London and Washington: Pinter .
15.
Hinich, Melvin J. and Michael C. Munger (1997) Analytical Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
16.
Huber, John and Ronald Inglehart (1995) ‘Expert Interpretations of Party Space and Party Locations in 42 Societies’ , Party Politics1: 73–111 .
17.
Inglehart, Ronald (1971) ‘The Silent Revolution in Europe: Intergenerational Change in Post-Industrial Societies’ , American Political Science Review65: 991–1017 .
18.
Inglehart, Ronald (1984) ‘The Changing Structure of Political Cleavages in Western Society’, in Russell Dalton et al. (eds) Electoral Change. Realignment and Dealignment in Advanced Industrial Democracies, pp. 25–69. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press .
19.
Kitschelt, Herbert (2001) ‘Politische Konfliktlinien in Westlichen Demokratien. Ethnisch-kulturelle und wirtschaftliche Verteilungskonflikte’, in Dietmar Loch and Wilhelm Heitmeyer (eds) Schattenseiten der Globalisierung, pp. 418–41. Frankfurt, Main: Suhrkamp.
20.
Klingemann, Hans-Dieter (1987) ‘Electoral Programmes in West Germany 1949–1980: Explorations in the Nature of Political Controversy’, in Ian Budge et al. (eds) Ideology, Strategy and Party Change. Spatial Analyses of Post-War Election Programmes in 19 Democracies, pp. 294–323. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
21.
Klingemann, Hans-Dieter and Andrea Volkens (2001) ‘Struktur und Entwicklung von Wahlprogrammen in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland 1949–1998’, in Oscar W. Gabriel et al. (eds) Parteiendemokratie in Deutschland, 2nd edn. Schriftenreihe Band 372, pp. 507–27. Bonn: Bundeszentrale für politische Bildung.
22.
Laver, Michael and John Garry (2000) ‘Estimating Policy Positions from Political Texts’ , American Journal of Political Science44: 619–634 .
23.
Laver, Michael and Kenneth A. Shepsle (1996) Making and Breaking Governments. Cabinets and Legislatures in Parliamentary Democracies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
24.
Lupia, Arthur and Mathew McCubbins (2001) ‘The Institutional Foundations of Political Competence. How Citizens Learn What They Need to Know’, in Arthur Lupia et al. (eds) Elements of Reason. Cognition, Choice, and the Bounds of Rationality, pp. 47–66. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
25.
Macdonald, Stuart E. et al. (1991) ‘Issues and Party Support in Multiparty Systems’ , American Political Science Review85: 1107–1132 .
26.
Mainwaring, Scott and Timothy R. Scully (1995) ‘Introduction: Party Systems in Latin America’, in Scott Mainwaring and Timothy R. Scully (eds) Building Democratic Institutions: Party Systems in Latin America, pp. 1–34. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press .
27.
Mair, Peter (2001) ‘Searching for the Positions of Political Actors. A Review of Approaches and a Critical Evaluation of Expert Surveys’, in Michael Laver (ed.) Estimating the Policy Positions of Political Actors, pp. 11–30. London: Routledge .
28.
Mair, Peter and Stefano Bartolini (1990) ‘Policy Competition, Spatial Distance and Electoral Instability’ , West European Politics13: 1–16 .
29.
McDonald, Michael D. et al. (2004) ‘Choice versus Sensitivity: Party Reactions to Public Concerns’ , European Journal of Political Research43: 845–868 .
30.
Pappi, Franz Urban and Susumu Shikano (2004) Ideologische Signale in den Wahlprogrammen der deutschen Bundestagsparteien 1980 bis 2002. MZES Working Paper 76. Mannheim: MZES .
31.
Pelizzo, Riccardo (2003) ‘Party Positions or Party Direction? An Analysis of Party Manifesto Data’ , West European Politics26: 67–89 .
32.
Powell, G. Bingham (2000) Elections as Instruments of Democracy. Majoritarian and Proportional Visions. New Haven, CT and London: Yale University Press .
33.
Rabinowitz, George and Stuart E. MacDonald (1989) ‘A Directional Theory of Issue Voting’ , American Political Science Review83: 93–121 .
34.
Sani, Giacomo and Giovanni Sartori (1983) ‘Polarization, Fragmentation, and Competition in Western Democracies’, in Hans Daalder and Peter Mair (eds) Western European Party Systems, 307–340. London: Sage .
35.
Sartori, Giovanni (1976) Parties and Party Systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
36.
Stokes, Donald E. (1963) ‘Spatial Models of Party Competition’ , American Political Science Review57: 368–377 .
37.
Tsebelis, George (2002) Veto Players. How Political Institutions Work. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press .
38.
Volkens, Andrea (2001) ‘Quantifying the Election Programmes: Coding Procedures and Controls’, in Ian Budge et al. (eds) Mapping Policy Preferences. Estimates for Parties, Electors, and Governments 1945–1998, pp. 93–109. Oxford: Oxford University Press
39.
Ware, Alan (1996) Political Parties and Party Systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press .
