Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Theory regarding turnout in elections suggests that voters are more likely to vote when their vote could be decisive. The article provides a generalized test of the relationship between the likelihood of turning out and the closeness of elections. Data are single-member district (firstpast-the-post) and regional (party list) constituency-level results from the Scottish Parliament election of 1999. Scotland provides an excellent case because the 1999 Scottish Parliament was elected using a combination of single-member districts, plus an additional member, regional list alternative vote system. In addition, the Scottish Parliament election was characterized by regional, multiparty competition. Controlling for other factors, the article finds that closeness counts and relates to higher levels of voter participation in the Scottish Parliament elections. This finding holds for single-member district (first-past-the-post) constituencies and additional member regional lists.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aldrich, John (1993) ‘ Rational Choice and Turnout’ , American Journal of Political Science 37: 63–87 .

Black, Jerome H. (1978) ‘ The Multicandidate Calculus of Voting: Application to Canadian Federal Elections’ , American Journal of Political Science 22: 609–638 .

Black, Jerome H. (1991) ‘Reforming the Context of the Voting Process in Canada: Lessons from Other Democracies’, in Herman Bakvis (ed.) Voter Turnout in Canada, pp. 61–76. Toronto: Dundurn Press .

BBC (1999) ‘Scotland: Vote 99: Constituencies and Regions: Results’, www.news6.thdo.bbc.co.uk/hi/English/static/vote_99/Scotland_99/html/azindex.stm. Downloaded 24/8/99.

Caldeira, Gregory A. and Samuel C. Patterson (1982) ‘ Contextual Influences on Participation in US State Legislative Elections’ , Legislative Studies Quarterly 7: 359–381 .

Cox, Gary W. (1988) ‘ Closeness and Turnout: A Methodological Note’ , Journal of Politics 50: 768–775 .

Cox, Gary W. and Micheal C. Munger (1989) ‘ Closeness, Expenditures, and Turnout in the 1982 U.S. House Elections’ , American Political Science Review 83: 217–231 .

Curtis, Stephen and Graham Vidler (1999) ‘Scottish Parliament Election Results’, Research Paper 99/1. Edinburgh: Scottish Parliament .

Denver, David and Keith Halfacree (1992) ‘ Inter-constituency Migration and Turnout at the British General Election of 1983’ , British Journal of Political Science 22: 248–254 .

10.

Denver, D. and H. T. G. Hands (1974) ‘ Marginality and Turnout in British General Elections’ , British Journal of Political Science 4: 17–35 .

11.

Denver, D. and H. T. G. Hands (1985) ‘ Marginality and Turnout in General Elections in the 1970s’ , British Journal of Political Science 15: 381–398 .

12.

Denver, D. and H. T. G. Hands (1997) ‘ Turnout’ , Parliamentary Affairs 50: 720–732 .

13.

Downs, Anthony (1957) An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper & Row .

14.

Eagles, Munroe (1991) ‘Voting and Non-voting in Canadian Federal Elections: An Ecological Analysis’, in Herman Bakvis (ed.) Voter Turnout in Canada, pp. 3–32. Toronto: Dundurn Press .

15.

Endersby, James, et al. (2002) ‘ Closeness Counts in Canada’ , Journal of Politics 64: 610–631 .

16.

Endersby, James W. and Steven E. Galatas (1998) ‘ Closeness and Turnout: Evidence from the 1997 British General Election .’ Paper presented at the annual meetings of the Southern Political Science Association, Atlanta, October. 28–31

17.

Ferejohn, John A. and Morris P. Fiorina (1974) ‘ The Paradox of Not Voting: A Decision Theoretic Analysis’ , American Political Science Review 68: 525–536 .

18.

Lutz, James M. (1991) ‘ Marginality, Major Third Parties, and Turnout in England in the 1970s and 1980s: A Re-Analysis and Extension’ , Political Studies 39: 721–726 .

19.

Morgan, Bryn (1999) ‘Scottish Parliament Elections: 6 May 1999’, House of Commons Research Paper 99/50. London: House of Commons .

20.

Mughan, Anthony (1986) Party and Participation in British Elections. New York: St. Martin’s Press .

21.

Myles, Andy (1999) ‘The New Electoral System’, in Gerry Hassan (ed.) A Guide to the Scottish Parliament, pp. 110–138. Edinburgh: The Stationery Office .

22.

Newton, K. (1972) ‘ Turnout and Marginality in Local Elections’ , British Journal of Political Science 2: 251–255 .

23.

Norris, Pippa (2001) The British Parliamentary Constituency Database, 1992–2001 .

24.

Pattie, Charles and Ron Johnston (1998) ‘ Voter Turnout in the British General Election of 1992: Rational Choice, Social Standing, or Political Efficacy?’ , European Journal of Political Research 33: 263–283 .

25.

Pimlott, Ben (1973) ‘ Local Party Organization, Turnout, and Marginality’ , British Journal of Political Science 3: 252–255 .

26.

Rallings, Collin and Michael Thrasher (1990) ‘ Turnout in English Local Elections – An Aggregate Analysis with Electoral and Contextual Data’ , Electoral Studies 9: 79–90 .

27.

Riker, William H. and Peter C. Ordeshook (1968) ‘ A Theory of the Calculus of Voting’ , American Political Science Review 62: 25–42 .

28.

Schwartz, Thomas (1987) ‘ Your Vote Counts on Account of the Way It is Counted: An Institutional Solution to the Paradox of Not Voting’ , Public Choice 54: 101–121 .

29.

Scottish Parliament (1999) ‘Results of the Election to the Scottish Parliament, May 1999: Constituency Results’, www.scottish.parliament.uk/msps/results_home0.html. Downloaded 24/6/02.

30.

Swaddle, Kevin and Anthony Heath (1989) ‘ Official and Reported Turnout in the British General Election of 1987’ , British Journal of Political Science 19: 537–570 .

31.

hlaner, Carole J. (1989) ‘ Rational Turnout: The Neglected Role of Groups’ , American Journal of Political Science 33: 390–422 .

32.

Whitely, Paul, et al. (2001) ‘ Turnout’ , Parliamentary Affairs 54: 775–788 .

Electing the First Parliament

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References