The recent changes in the Islamist party’s ideology and policies in Turkey are analysed in this article. The Islamist Welfare Party (WP) was ousted from power in June 1997 and was outlawed by the Constitutional Court (CC) in March 1998. After the ban, the WP elite founded the Virtue Party and changed policies on a number of issues. They emphasized democracy and basic human rights and freedoms in the face of this external shock. The WP’s hostile policy toward the European Union (EU) was changed. This process of change is discussed and it is argued that the EU norms presented a political opportunity structure for the party elites to influence the change of direction of the party. When the VP was banned by the CC in June 2001, the VP elites split and founded two parties which differ on a number of issues but have positive policies toward the EU.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Akyol, Taha (1997a) ‘Siyasal islam’ (Political Islam). Milliyet (19 February 1997).
2.
Akyol, Taha (1997b) ‘RP ve rejim’, Milliyet (7 February 1998).
3.
Burchell, Jon (2001) ‘Evolving or Conforming? Assessing Organizational Reform Within European Green Parties’ , West European Politics24(3).
4.
Candar, Cengiz (2000) ‘Ataturk’s Ambiguous Legacy’, The Wilson Quarterly (autumn).
5.
Carkoglu, Ali (1998) ‘The Turkish Party System in Transition: Party Performance and Agenda Change’ , Political StudiesXLVI: 544-571 .
6.
Dagi, Ihsan (1998) Kimlik, Soylem ve Siyaset: Dogu-Bati ayriminda Refah Partisi Gelenegi (Identity, Discourse, and Politics: Welfare Party Tradition between East and West). Ankara: Imge Yayinevi .
7.
Erbakan, Necmettin (1975) Milli Gorus. Istanbul: Dergah Yayinlari .
8.
Erbakan, Necmettin (1991) Turkiye’nin Temel Meseleleri. Ankara: Rehber Yayinlari .
Gul, Abdullah (2000) ‘Avusturya’daki Yeni Hukumetin Dusundurdukleri’ (Thoughts on the New Government in Austria), Milliyet (16 February 2000).
11.
Harmel, Robert and K. Janda (1994) ‘An Integrated Theory of Party Goals and Party Change’ , Journal of Theoretical Politics6: 259-287 .
12.
Harmel, Robert, Uk Heo, Alexander Tan and Kenneth Janda (1995) ‘Performance, Leadership, Factions and Party Change: An Empirical Analysis’ , West European Politics18: 1-33 .
13.
Karakus, Abdullah (1998) ‘“FP”nin Demokratik Degisim Projesi’ (The VP’s Program of Democratic Change, Milliyet (18 May 1998).
14.
Katz, Richard S. and Peter Mair (1994) ‘The Evolution of Party Organizations in Europe: The Three Faces of Party Organization’ , American Review of Politics4: 593-617 .
15.
Kitschelt, Herbert (1988) ‘Political Opportunity Structures and Political Protest: Anti-Nuclear Movements in Four Democracies’ , British Journal of Political Science16: 58-73 .
16.
Kalaycioglu, E. (1994) ‘Elections and Party Preferences in Turkey’ , Comparative Political Studies27: 403-425 .
17.
Kramer, Heinz (2000) A Changing Turkey: The Challenge to Europe and the US. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press .
18.
Mardin, S. (1973) ‘Center Periphery Relations: A Key to Turkish Politics?’ Daedalus102: 169-191 .
19.
Martens, Kerstin (2001) ‘Applying the Concept of “Political Opportunity Structures” in European and International Studies’ , Transnational Associations1: 2-9 .
20.
Milliyet Daily.
21.
Milli Gazete Daily.
22.
Muftuler-Bac, Meltem (2000) ‘Impact of the EU on Turkish Politics’ , East European Quarterly34: 159 .
23.
Müller, Wolfgang C. (1997) ‘Inside the Black Box: A Confrontation of Party Organizational Change’ , Party Politics3: 293-313 .
24.
Müller, Wolfgang C. and Kaare Strom (1999) Policy, Office, or Votes? How Political Parties in Western Europe Make Hard Decisions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
Panebianco, Angelo (1988) Political Parties: Organization and Power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
27.
Sazak, Derya (1997a) ‘Refah’a Yeni Uslup’ (A New Discourse to Welfare). Milliyet (2 February 1997).
28.
Schellenger, Harold K. (1968) The PSD in the Bonn Republic: A Socialist Party Modernizes. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff .
29.
Tachau, F. (1984) Turkey: The Politics of Authority, Democracy, and Development. New York: Praeger .
30.
Thomas, Daniel (2001) The Helsinki Effect: International Norms, Human Rights and the Demise of Communism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press .
31.
Thomas, Daniel (1999) ‘The Helsinki Accords and Political Change in Eastern Europe’, in Thomas Risse, Stephen C. Ropp and Kathryn Sikkink (eds) The Power of Human Rights: International Norms and Domestic Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
32.
Turkish Daily News (TDN).
33.
Turkone, Mumtaz’er (1991) Siyasi Ideoloji Olarak Islamciligin Dogusu. Istanbul: Iletisim Yayinlari .
34.
Unal, Mustafa (1998) ‘Politik’ Zaman Daily (8 March 1998).
35.
Whitehead, Laurence (2001) The International Dimensions of Democratization. Oxford: Oxford University Press .
36.
Wilson, Frank L. (1994) ‘The Sources of Party Change: The Social Democratic Parties of Britain, France, Germany, and Spain’, in Kay Lawson (ed.) How Political Parties Work: Perspectives from Within. Praeger .
