This paper develops models of minor-party mobilization and electoral success. Models are estimated with data from Australian Senate elections from 1922 to 1998. Existing literature and the Australian experience demonstrate that long-term minor-party activity is conditioned by election rules, economic conditions and other factors. Australian Senate elections have been conducted under a variety of election rules, and thus provide a rare opportunity for modelling the effects of variation in these forces on minor-party activity. Results demonstrate that minor parties mobilize more candidates and receive more votes when electoral rules reduce the proportion of votes necessary to win a seat. Economic decline is also found to increase the mobilization of minor-party candidates and increase voter support.
Australian Bureau of Statistics (1996) Australian National Accounts 1995-6. Catalogue No. 5204 0.
2.
Bean, Clive and Elim Papadakis (1995) `Minor Parties and Independents: Electoral Bases and Future Prospects', Australian Journal of Political Science30: 111-126.
3.
Bowler, Shaun and David Lanoue (1992) `Strategic and Protest Voting for Third Parties: The Case of the Canadian NDP', Western Political Quarterly45: 485-499.
4.
Bowler, Shaun , Todd Donovan and David Farrell (1999) `Party Strategy and Voter Organization Under Cumulative Voting in Victorian England', Political Studies47: 906-917.
5.
Burnham, W. D. (1970) Critical Elections and the Mainsprings of American Politics. New York: Norton.
6.
Converse, Philip (1969) `Of Time and Partisan Stability', Comparative Political Studies2: 139-171.
7.
Cox, Gary (1997) Making Votes Count. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
8.
Donovan, Todd (1998) `Minor Parties in Australian Elections', paper presented at the Pacific Northwest Political Science Association meeting Victoria, British Columbia.
9.
Donovan, Todd , Shaun Bowler and Tammy Terrio (2000) `Support for Minor Parties in California', American Politics Quarterly28(1): 50-71.
10.
Duverger, Maurice (1954) Political Parties. New York: Wiley.
11.
The Economist (1998) `Not Exactly One Nation', The Economist348 (18 July): 39-40.
12.
Economou, Nicholas M. (1998) `The Trouble-maker's Ballot Box? A Note on the Evolving Role of the Australian Federal By-election', Australian Journal of Political Science34: 239-239.
13.
Farrell, David (1997) Comparing Electoral Systems. London: Prentice Hall.
14.
Hughes, Colin A. and C. Graham (1968) Handbook of Australian Government and Politics: 1890-1964. Canberra: ANU Press.
15.
Hughes, Colin A. and C. Graham (1977) Handbook of Australian Government and Politics: 1965-1974. Canberra: ANU Press.
16.
Hughes, Colin A. and C. Graham (1982) Handbook of Australian Government and Politics: 1975-1982. Canberra: ANU Press.
17.
Jackman, Simon (1998) `Pauline Hanson, the Mainstream, and Political Elites: The Place of Race in Australian Political Ideology', Australian Journal of Political Science33: 167-167.
18.
Key, V. O. (1955) `A Theory of Critical Elections', Journal of Politics17: 3-18.
19.
Lijphart, Arend (1994) Electoral Systems and Party Systems. New York: Oxford University Press.
20.
Lucy, Richard (1993) The Australian Form of Government, 2nd edn.Melbourne: Macmillan.
21.
McAllister, Ian (1982) `The Australian Democrats: Protest Vote or Potent of Realignment?', Politics17: 68-73.
22.
Mackerras, Malcolm (1996) 1996 Federal Election Guide. Canberra: Australian Government Publication Services.
23.
Marks, Gary and Clive S. Bean (1992) `Sources of Electoral Support for Minor Parties: The Case of the Australian Democrats', Electoral Studies11: 311-333.
24.
Mughan, Anthony (1987) `The Hip Pocket Nerve and Electoral Volatility in Australia and Great Britain', Politics22: 66-75.
25.
Papadakis, Elim and Clive Bean (1995) `Minor Parties and Independents: The Electoral System', Australian Journal of Political Science30: 97-110.
26.
Reynolds, Paul (1979) `The Australian Democrats', in H. Penniman (ed.) The Australian National Elections of 1977. Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute.
27.
Reynolds, R. L. (1974) The Democratic Labor Party. Brisbane: Jacaranda.
28.
Richmond, Keith (1978) `Minor Parties in Australia', in G. Starr, K. Richmond and G. Maddox (eds) Political Parties in Australia. Richmond, Victoria: Heinemann Educational Australia.
29.
Riker, William (1982) `The Two-Party System and Duverger's Law: An Essay of the History of Political Science', American Political Science Review76: 753-766.
30.
Rosenstone, S. , R. Behr and E. Lazarus (1984) Third Parties in America: Citizen Response to Major Party Failure. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
31.
Sharman, Campbell (1986) `The Senate, Small Parties and the Balance of Power', Politics21: 20-31.
32.
Sharman, Campbell (1990a) `Parliamentary Federations and Limited Government: Constitutional Design and Redesign in Australia and Canada', Journal of Theoretical Politics2(2): 205-225.
33.
Sharman, Campbell (1990b) `The Party Systems of the Australian States: Patterns of Partisan Competition, 1945-1986', Publius20(4): 85-104.
34.
Stone, Bruce (1998) `Small Parties and the Senate Revisited: The Consequences of the Enlargement of the Senate in 1984', Australian Journal of Political Science33: 211-211.
35.
Studlar, Donley T. and Ian McAllister (1987) `Protest and Survive? Support in the 1983 British General Election', Political Studies35: 39-60.
36.
Warhurst, John (1997) Keeping the Bastards Honest: The Australian Democrats' First Twenty Years. St Leonards, NSW: Allen & Unwin.
