Government Formation and Party System Stabilization in East Central Europe

Abstract

The stabilization of party systems in new democracies is commonly assumed to be a lengthy process. Applying Peter Mair's government-formation-based model of party system development to the three young East Central European democracies of Hungary, Poland and the Czech Republic, the article shows that party systems can stabilize much more quickly than expected. In an analysis of emerging party system patterns, the Hungarian and Czech party systems are found to be far more stable than the Polish, and already nearly as stable as more mature party systems. Examining differences in the three cases, the article makes two primary conclusions about the process of stabilization in new party systems. First, it suggests that stabilization is the product of both electoral system design and consequent patterns of elite behavior. Second, it argues that stabilization not only occurs in spite of on-going volatility in party-voter alignments, but actually serves to reduce it.

Keywords

democratic transition East Central Europe electoral volatility government formation party system stabilization

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ágh, Attila (1994) The East Central European Party System: Linkages Between Parties and Society. Budapest: Budapest University of Economics, Budapest Papers on Democratic Transition.

Akcja Wyborcza Solidarnosc (AWS) (1997) AWS website: http://www.solidarnosc. org

Bartolini, Stefano and Peter Mair (1990) Identity, Competition, and Electoral Availability: The Stabilisation of European Electorates 1885-1985. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Duverger, Maurice (1954) Political Parties: Their Organization and Activity in the Modern State. London: Methuen.

Gallagher, Michael (1991) `Proportionality, Disproportionality and Electoral Systems', Electoral Studies 10: 33-51.

Laakso, Markku and Rein Taagepera (1979) ` “Effective” Number of Parties: A Measure with Application to West Europe', Comparative Political Studies 12: 3-27.

Lijphart, Arend (1984) Democracies: Patterns of Majoritarian and Consensus Government in Twenty-one Countries. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

Lijphart, Arend (1994) Electoral Systems and Party Systems: A Study of Twenty-seven Democracies, 1945-1990. New York: Oxford University Press.

Lipset, Seymour M. and Stein Rokkan (1967) `Cleavage Structures, Party Systems, and Voter Alignments', in Seymour M. Lipset and Stein Rokkan (eds) Party Systems and Voter Alignments: Cross-national Perspectives, pp. 1-63. New York: The Free Press.

10.

Mair, Peter (1983) `Adaptation and Control: Towards an Understanding of Party and Party System Change', in Hans Daalder and Peter Mair (eds) Western European Party Systems: Continuity and Change, pp. 405-429. London: Sage Publications.

11.

Mair, Peter (1997) Party System Change: Approaches and Interpretations. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

12.

Markowski, Radoslaw (1997) `Political Parties and Ideological Spaces in East Central Europe', Communist and Post-Communist Studies 30: 221-254.

13.

Olson, David (1993) `Political Parties and Party Systems in Regime Transformation: Inner Transition in the New Democracies of Central Europe', The American Review of Politics 14: 619-658.

14.

Pataki, Judith (1993) `Hungary's Leading Opposition Party Torn by Dissension', RFE/RL Research Report (17 December): 24-28.

15.

Rae, Douglas W. (1971) The Political Consequences of Electoral Laws. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

16.

Sartori, Giovanni (1976) Parties and Party Systems: A Framework for Analysis. New York: Cambridge University Press.

17.

Wesolowski, Wlodzimierz (1996) `The Formation of Political Parties in Post-communist Poland', in Geoffrey Pridham and Paul G. Lewis (eds) Stabilising Fragile Democracies: Comparing New Party Systems in Southern and Eastern Europe. London: Routledge.