Ashmore, M.
(1989). The reflexive thesis: Wrighting sociology of scientific knowledge. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
2.
Ashmore, M.
, Myers, G., & Potter, J. (1995). Discourse, rhetoric, reflexivity: Seven days in the library. In S. Jasanoff, G. Markle, J. Petersen, & T. Pinch (Eds.), Handbook of science and technology studies (pp. 321–343). London: Sage.
3.
Joyce, J.
(1968). Ulysses. New York: Viking. (Original work published 1922)
4.
Latour, B.
(1980). The three little dinosaurs or a sociologist’s nightmare. Fundamenta Scientiae, 1, 79–85.
5.
MacMillan, K.
(1995). Giving voice: The participant takes issue. Feminism & Psychology, 5(4), 547–552.
6.
Mulkay, M.
(1985). The word and the world: Explorations in the form of sociological analysis. London: Allen & Unwin.
7.
Mulkay, M.
(1991). Sociology of science: A sociological pilgrimage. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
8.
Pinch, T.
, & Pinch, T. (1988). Reservations about reflexivity and new literary forms, or why let the devil have all the good tunes? In S. Woolgar (Ed.), Knowledge and reflexivity: New frontiers in the sociology of science (pp. 178–198). London/Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
9.
Woolgar, S.
(1983). Irony in the social studies of science. In K.D. Knorr-Cetina & M. Mulkay (Eds.), Science observed: Perspectives on the social study of science (pp. 239–266). London/Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
