Current representational-computational approaches to human cognition and communication, it is argued, represent natural-scientifically coached ramifications of an analyticrationalist philosophical tradition concerned with formal features D of 'pure' and de-contextualized human reason. Scholars conducting their inquiries within hermeneutic-dialogically founded traditions, on the other hand, are seriously concerned with the inherent perspectivity of human cognition and the embeddedness of linguistically mediated meaning in pervasive background conditions and fluctuating human interests and concerns. The epistemological gulf between analytic-rationalist and herrneneutic-dialogical approaches is reflected in their answers to the question whether the researcher's and informant's mastery of meaning 'from within' should be considered a cumbersome residual or an opaque, yet indispensable resource. What has to be dealt with as a residual to get rid of in attempts at externalization and machine representation of human knowledge and reasoning, it is suggested, may constitute an indispensable resource in any potentially emancipatory study of language and mind.
Andler, D.
(1986, September 22-3). Studying cognition today. Paper presented at the European Science Foundation Interdisciplinary Workshop on Control-Meaning-Structure, Zurich.
2.
Apel, K.O.
(1968). Scientifik, Hermeneutik, Ideologie-Kritik: Entwurf einer Wissenschaftslehre in erkenntnisanthropologischer Sicht. Man and the World, 1, 37-63.
3.
Baker, G.P.
, & Hacker, P.M.S. (1980). Wittgenstein: Meaning and understanding. Oxford: Blackwell.
4.
Bakhtin, M.
(1973). Problems of Dostoevsky's poetics. Ann Arbor, MI: Ardis.
5.
Barwise, J.
, & Perry, J. (1983). Situations and attitudes. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
6.
Buber, M.
(1962). What is Man? In W. Barrett & H.E. Aiken (Eds.), Philosophy in the twentieth century (pp. 688-719). New York: Random House.
7.
Chilton, P.
(1987). Co-operation and non-co-operation: Ethical and political aspects of communication. Language and Communication, 7, 221-239.
8.
Chomsky, N.
(1972). Studies on semantics in generative grammar. The Hague: Mouton.
9.
Chomsky, N.
(1980). Rules and representations. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3, 1-61.
10.
Clark, H.H.
(1977). Bridging. In P.N. Johnson-Laird & P.C. Wason (Eds.), Thinking: Readings in cognitive science (pp. 411-420). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
11.
Cummins, R.
(1983). The nature of psychological explanation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
12.
Davidson, D.
(1980). Essays on actions and events. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
13.
Dreyfus, H.L.
(1979). What computers can't do: The limits of artificial intelligence. New York: Harper.
14.
Feigl, H.
(1953). Notes on causality. In H. Feigl & M. Broadbeck (Eds.), Readings on the philosophy of science (pp. 408-418). New York: AppletonCentury-Crofts.
15.
Fodor, J.A.
(1980). Methodological solipsism considered as a research strategy in cognitive psychology. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3, 63-109.
16.
Fodor, J.A.
, & Garrett, M.F. (1966). Some reflections on competence and performance. In J. Lyons & R.J. Wales (Eds.), Psycholinguistic papers (pp. 133-154). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
17.
Fodor, J.A.
, Garrett, M.F., Walker, E.C.T., & Parkes, C.H. (1980). Against definitions. Cognition, 8, 203-367.
18.
Frege, G.
(1969). Funktion, Begriff, Bedeutung: Fu nf logische Studien. Gbttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.
19.
Gadamer, H.G.
(1975). Wahrheit und Methode. Tubingen: J.C.B. Mohr.
20.
Giddens, A.
(1982). Profiles and critiques in social theory. London: Macmillan.
21.
Grice, H.P.
(1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J.L. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics: Vol. 3: Speech acts (pp. 41-58). London: Academic Press.
22.
Habermas, J.
(1968). Erkenntnis und Interesse. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
23.
Habermas, J.
(1970). Toward a theory of communicative competence. In P.E. Dreitzel (Ed.), Patterns of communicative behavior. Recent sociology, Vol. 2 (pp. 114-148).London: Macmillan.
24.
Habermas, J.
(1981). Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
25.
Hebb, D.
(1974). What psychology is about. American Psychologist, 29, 71-79.
26.
Herbst, D. (1987). Man and machine: The different nature of contextual and modular functioning. Oslo, mimeo from Work Research Institute.
27.
Johnson-Laird, P.N.
(1987). The mental representation of the meaning of words. Cognition, 25,189-211.
28.
Katz, J.J.
, & Fodor, J.A. (1963). The structure of semantic theory. Language, 39, 170-210.
29.
Lakoff, G.
(1980). What happened to deep structure?Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3, 22-23.
30.
Lakoff, G.
, & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
31.
Lyons, J.
(1977). Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
32.
Putnam, H.
(1978). Meaning and the moral sciences. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
33.
Pylyshyn, Z.W.
(1980). Computation and cognition: Issues in the foundations of cognitive science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3, 111-169.
34.
Reddy, M.
(1979). The conduit metaphor-a case of frame conflict in our language about language. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (pp. 284-324). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
35.
Ricoeur, P.
(1984). Hermeneutics and the human sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
36.
Rommetveit, R.
(1980). On 'meanings' of acts and what is meant by what is said in a pluralistic social world. In M. Brenner (Ed.), The structure of action (pp. 108-149). Oxford: Blackwell & Mott.
37.
Rommetveit, R.
(1988). On literacy and the myth of literal meaning. In R. Saljb (Ed.), The written world (pp. 13-40). Heidelberg: Springer.
38.
Rommetveit, R.
, & Blakar, R.M. (Eds.). (1979). Studies of language, thought and verbal communication. London: Academic Press.
39.
Rorty, R.
(1980). Philosophy and the mirror of nature. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Searle, J.R.
(1979). Metaphor. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (pp. 92-123). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
42.
Snow, C.P.
(1959). The two cultures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
43.
Stamper, R. (1984, July). Management epistemology: Garbage in, garbage out. (And what about deontology and axiology?) Paper presented at working conference on Knowledge Representation for Decision Support, Durham, UK.
44.
Winograd, T.
(1980). What does it mean to understand language?Cognitive Science, 4, 209-241.
45.
Winograd, T.
(1985). Moving the semantic fulcrum. Linguistics and Philosophy, 8, 91-104.
46.
Winograd, T.
, & Flores, C.F. (1986). Understanding computers and cognition: A newfoundationfor design. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
47.
Wittgenstein, L.
(1968). Philosophical investigations. Oxford: Blackwell.
