Buhler, K.
(1965). Sprachtheorie. Jena and Stuttgart: Fischer. (Original work published 1934)
2.
Durkheim, E.
(1915). The elementary forms of religious life: A study in religious sociology. London: Allen & Unwin. (Original work published 1912)
3.
Hurme, H.
(1995). Wild man or golden bird: Cultural readings of masculinity. Culture & Psychology, 1(4), 477-486.
4.
Jovanovid, G.
(1995). Reading and living images of masculinity: Comments on Parker's 'wild men'. Culture & Psychology, 1(4), 487-496.
5.
Moodie, E.
, Markova, I., & Plichtova, J. (1995). Lay representations of democracy: A study in two cultures. Culture & Psychology, 1(4), 423-453.
6.
Moscovici, S.
(1988). Notes towards a description of social representations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 18, 211-250.
7.
Moscovici, S.
(1990). Social psychology and developmental psychology: Extending the conversation. In G. Duveen & B. Lloyd (Eds.), Social representations and the development of knowledge (pp. 164-185). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
8.
Moscovici, S.
(1994). Social representations and pragmatic communication. Social Science Information, 33(2), 163-177.
9.
Nemedi, D.
(1995). Collective consciousness, morphology, and collective representations: Durkheim's sociology of knowledge, 1894-1900. Sociological Perspectives, 38(1), 41-56.
10.
Parker, I.
(1995). Masculinity and cultural change: Wild men. Culture & Psychology, 1(4), 455-475.
11.
Valsiner, J.
, & Van der Veer, R. (1993). The encoding of distance: The concept of the zone of proximal development and its interpretations. In R.R. Cocking & K.A. Renninger (Eds.), The development and meaning of psychological distance (pp. 35-62). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
12.
Wagner, W.
(1994). Fields of research and socio-genesis of social representations: A discussion of criteria and diagnostics. Social Science Information, 33(2), 199-228.
