Michael Cole's conception of a cultural psychology which is rooted in Russian activity theory is discussed from the perspective of action theory which also aims at an integration of culture into psychology but does so by slightly different concepts. Beyond the shared divergence from classical cross-cultural psychology there are many similarities between activity and action theory, but differences also exist.
Berry, J.W.
, Poortinga, Y.H., Segall, M.H., & Dasen, P.R. (1992). Cross-cultural psychology: Research and application. New York: Cambridge University Press.
2.
Boesch, E.E.
(1976). Psychopathologie des Alltags [Psychopathology of daily life]. Berne: Huber.
3.
Boesch, E.E.
(1987). Cultural psychology in action-theoretical perspective. In C. Kagitcibasi (Ed.), Growth and progress in cultural psychology (pp. 41-51). Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger.
4.
Boesch, E.E.
(1991). Symbolic action theory and cultural psychology. Berlin: Springer.
5.
Chasiotis, A.
, & Keller, H. (1994). Evolutionary psychology and developmental cross-cultural psychology. In A.-M. Bouvy, F.J.R. van de Vijver, P. Boski, & P. Schmitz (Eds.), Journeys into cross-cultural psychology (pp. 68-82). Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger.
6.
Cole, M.
(1988). Cross-cultural research in the socio-historical tradition. Human Development, 31,137-157.
7.
Cole, M. (1993). Cultural-historical psychology: A meso-genetic approach. Unpublished manuscript, Laboratory of Comparative Human Cognition, University of California at San Diego.
8.
Cole, M.
(1995). Culture and cognitive development: From cross-cultural research to creating systems of cultural mediation. Culture & Psychology, 1(1), 25-54.
9.
Cole, M.
, & Cole, S. (1989). The development of children. New York: W.H. Freeman.
10.
Eckensberger, L.H.
(1968). Unterrichtsprobleme an technisch-gewerblichen Ausbildungsstdtten in Entwicklungslandern [Teaching problems at technical and vocational schools in developing countries]. Stuttgart: Klett.
11.
Eckensberger, L.H.
(1970). Methodenprobleme der kulturvergleichenden Psychologie [Problems of methods in cross-cultural psychology]. Saarbrucken: Verlag der SSIP-Schriften.
12.
Eckensberger, L.H.
(1976). Der Beitrag kulturvergleichender Forschung zur Fragestellung der Umweltpsychologie [The contribution of cross-cultural psychology to questions of environmental psychology]. In G. Kaminski (Ed.), Umweltpsychologie-Perspektiven, Probleme, Praxis (pp. 73-98) Stuttgart: Klett.
13.
Eckensberger, L.H.
(1979). A metamethodological evaluation of psychological theories from a cross-cultural perspective. In L.H. Eckensberger, W.J. Lonner, & Y.H. Poortinga (Eds.), Cross-cultural contributions to psychology (pp. 255-275). Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger.
14.
Eckensberger, L.H.
(1989). A bridge between theory and practice, between general laws and contexts?Psychology and Developing Societies, 1, 21-35.
15.
Eckensberger, L.H.
(1990). From cross-cultural psychology to cultural psychology. Qtly Newsletter of the Laboratory of Comparative Human Cognition, 12, 37-52.
16.
Eckensberger, L;H.
(in press). Agency, action and culture: Three basic concepts for psychology in general and for cross-cultural psychology in specific. In Janak Pandey, Durganand Sinha, & P.S. Bawak (Eds.), Asian contributions to cross-cultural psychology: Proceedings of the 3rd Regional Asian Conference of the IACCP (Kathmandu, 2-7 January 1992). Kathmandu.
17.
Eckensberger, L.H.
, & Burgard, P. (1983). The assessment of normative concepts: Some considerations on the affinity between methodological approaches and preferred theories. In S.H. Irvine & J. Berry (Eds.), Human assessment and cultural factors (pp. 459-480). New York: Plenum.
18.
Eckensberger, L.H.
, & Kreibich-Fischer, R. (1994). Affektive und kognitive Verarbeitung des Krankheitsgeschehens bei krebskranken Patienten [The affective and cognitive coping process of cancer patients]. Jahrbuch der Psychoonkologie. Vienna: Springer.
19.
Eckensberger, L.H.
, & Meacham, J. (1984). The essentials of action theory. A framework for discussion. Human Development, 27, 166-172.
20.
Gutman, D.
(1967). On cross-cultural studies as a naturalistic approach in psychology. Human Development, 10, 187-198.
21.
Habermas, J. (1981) Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
22.
Krewer, B.
(1990). Psyche and culture-can a culture-free psychology take into account the essential features of the species Homo sapiens?Qtly Newsletter of the Laboratory of Comparative Human Cognitive Development, 12, 24-37.
23.
Krewer, B.
(1992a). Kulturelle Identitat und menschliche Selbsterforschung [Cultural identity and human self-exploration]. Saarbrucken: Breitenbach.
24.
Krewer, B.
(1992b). Kulturpsychologie der kulturvergleichenden Psychologie [Cultural psychology of cross-cultural psychology]. Arbeiten der Fachrichtung Psychologie, Universitdt des Saarlandes, Saarbriicken.
25.
Krewer, B.
, & Eckensberger, L.H. (1989). Cultural identity and political events. In D.M. Keats, D. Munroe, & L. Mann (Eds.), Heterogenity in cross-cultural psychology (pp. 216-231). Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger.
26.
Laboratory of Comparative Human Cognition
(1983). Culture and cognitive development. In W. Kessen (Ed.), P. H. Mussen (Series Ed.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. I. History, theory and methods (4th ed., pp. 295-356). New York: Wiley.
Nieder, A.
, Sieloff, U., Kasper, E., & Eckensberger, L. H. (1987). Entwicklung eines Erhebungsinstruments fur die moralische Bewertung eines Umweltkonfliktes [The development of an instrument for the measurement of moral evaluations in an environmental conflict]. Arbeiten der Fachrichtung Psychologie, Universitdt des Saarlandes, Saarbrucken.
29.
Overton, W.F. (1994). Evolutionary meta-narratives and developmental change: towards a healing of the biological/social-culture split. Unpublished manuscript, Temple University, PA.
30.
Poortinga, Y.H.
, & Malpass, R.S. (1986). Making inferences from cross-cultural data. In W.J. Lonner & J.W. Berry (Eds.), Field methods in cross-cultural research (pp. 17-46). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
31.
Price-Williams, D.R.
(1980). Towards the idea of cultural psychology. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 11, 75-88.
32.
Rosnow, R.L.
, & Georgoudi, M. (1986). The spirit of contextualism. In R.L. Rosnow & M. Georgoudi (Eds.), Contextualism and understanding in behavioral science (pp. 3-22). New York: Praeger.
33.
Schultz, E.
(1994). The hermeneutical aspects of activity theory. Activity Theory, 15(16),13-16.
34.
Schwartz, L.
(1951). Die Neurosen und die dynamische Psychologie von Pierre Janet [The neurosis and the dynamic psychology of Pierre Janet]. Basel: Schwabe.
35.
Serpell, R.
(1990). Audience, culture and psychological explanation: A reformulation of the emic-etic problem in cross-cultural psychology. Qtly Newsletter of the Laboratory of Comparative Human Cognition, 12, 99-132.
36.
Shweder, R.A.
(1980). Rethinking culture and personality: From genesis and typology to hermeneutics and dynamics. Ethos, 8, 60-94.
37.
Smedslund, J.
(1984). The invisible obvious: Culture in psychology. In K.M.J. Lagerspetz & P. Niemi (Eds.), Psychology in the 1990s. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
38.
Smedslund, J.
(1988). Psycho-logic. Berlin: Springer.
39.
Steier, F.
(Ed.). (1991). Research and reflexivity. London: Sage.
40.
Stent, G. S.
(Ed.). (1978). Morality as a biological phenomenon. Berkeley: University of California Press.
41.
Valsiner, J.
(1988). Developmental psychology in the Soviet Union. Brighton: Harvester.
42.
Werbik, H.
(1985). Psychonomie und Psychologie [Psychonomy and psychology]. Niirnberg.
43.
Wright, G. H. von
(1971). Explanation and understanding. New York: Cornell University Press.
