Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Human beings have long struggled to explain the relationship between the external world and the inner life of the self. Across philosophy, psychology, and neuroscience, objectivity and subjectivity are typically treated as mutually exclusive categories, a division that obscures their deep interdependence. This paper argues for a conceptual shift: from viewing objectivity and subjectivity as antagonists to understanding them as co-constitutive dimensions of human existence. Drawing on interdisciplinary scholarship—phenomenology, cultural psychology, neuroscience, and philosophy of science—I examine how subjective experience permeates all acts of knowing, including scientific inquiry itself. Empirical evidence from contemporary Q methodology highlights the diversity of perspectives on subjectivity, while historical analyses reveal the persistent but unacknowledged role of subjective factors in knowledge-making. I propose that action is not merely the expression of an inner subjectivity but the very actuality through which subjectivity becomes objective. Recognizing this continuum invites a cultural psychology that integrates mind, world, and history, challenging the residual dominance of mechanistic naturalism and opening new possibilities for understanding the human condition.

Keywords

co-phenomenology cultural environments cultural psychology human existence interdisciplinary theory knowledge-making objectivity subjectivity

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Atwood

G. E.

Stolorow

R. D.

(2014). Structures of subjectivity: Explorations in psychoanalytic phenomenology and contextualism (2nd ed.). Routledge.

Baudrillard

(1988). Forget foucault (N. Dufresne, Trans.). Semiotext(e). (Original work published 1977).

Becker

(1967). Whose side are we on? Social Problems, 14(3), 239–247. https://doi.org/10.2307/799147

Carré

(2019). Towards a cultural psychology of science. Culture & Psychology, 25(1), 3–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354067X18790000

Cornejo

(2008). Intersubjectivity as co-phenomenology: From the holism of meaning to the being-in-the-world-with-others. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 42(2), 171–178. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-007-9043-6

Fancher

R. E.

Rutherford

(2017). Pioneers of psychology: A history (5th ed.). W. W. Norton & Company.

Greenwood

J. D.

(2009). A conceptual history of psychology (1st ed.). McGraw-Hill.

Hallam

(2018). Abolishing the concept of mental illness: Rethinking the nature of our woes. Routledge.

Heller-Roazen

(2007). The inner touch: Archaeology of a sensation. Zone Books.

10.

Hergenhahn

B. R.

(2009). An introduction to the history of psychology (6th ed.). Wadsworth, Cengage Learning.

11.

Joranger

(2019). An interdisciplinary approach to the human mind: Subjectivity, science and experiences in change. Routledge.

12.

Kirschner

S. R.

(2013). The many challenges of theorizing subjectivity. Culture & Psychology, 19(2), 225–236. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354067X13478979

13.

Leahey

T. H.

(2018). A history of psychology: From antiquity to modernity (8th ed.). Routledge.

14.

Letherby

Scott

Williams

(2013). Objectivity and subjectivity in social research. Sage Publications.

15.

Luhrmann

T. M.

(2006). Subjectivity. Anthropological Theory, 6(3), 345–361. https://doi.org/10.1177/1463499606066891

16.

Lundberg

Fraschini

Aliani

(2023). What is subjectivity? Scholarly perspectives on the elephant in the room. Quality and Quantity, 57, 4509–4529. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-023-01679-2

17.

McKeown

Thomas

(2013). Q methodology (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.

18.

Midgley

B. D.

Delprato

D. J.

(2017). Stephenson’s subjectivity as naturalistic and understood from a scientific perspective. Psychological Record, 67(4), 587–596. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40732-017-0252-4

19.

Northoff

(2016). Is the self a higher-order or fundamental function of the brain? The “basis model of self-specificity” and its encoding by the brain’s spontaneous activity. Cognitive Neuroscience, 7(1–4), 203–222. https://doi.org/10.1080/17588928.2015.1044427

20.

Northoff

(2018). The spontaneous brain: From the mind–body to the world–brain problem. MIT Press.

21.

Northoff

Smith

(2023). The subjectivity of self and its ontology: From the world–brain relation to the point of view in the world. Theory & Psychology, 33(4), 485–514. https://doi.org/10.1177/09593543231177120

22.

Robinson

D. N.

(1995). An intellectual history of psychology (3rd ed.). University of Wisconsin Press.

23.

Shapin

(2011). The sciences of subjectivity. Social Studies of Science, 42(2), 170–184. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312711423436

24.

Stamenkovic

(2023). Facts and objectivity in science. Interdisciplinary Science Reviews, 48(2), 277–298. https://doi.org/10.1080/03080188.2022.2150807

25.

Stephenson

(1968). Consciousness out—subjectivity in. Psychological Record, 18(4), 499–501. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03393811

26.

Sulik

Rim

Pontikes

Evans

Lupyan

(2025). Differences in psychologists’ cognitive traits are associated with scientific divides. Nature Human Behaviour, 9(6), 1147–1161. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-025-02153-1

27.

Teo

(2017). From psychological science to the psychological humanities: Building a general theory of subjectivity. Review of General Psychology, 21(4), 281–291. https://doi.org/10.1037/gpr0000132

Objectivity and Subjectivity Revisited: Towards a Shared Human Ontology

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References