The scientific literature widely recognizes the role of worldviews in influencing psychological and socio-cultural phenomena. The investigation into the temporal stability of worldviews has mainly focused on the individual and population levels, ignoring the question of the stability of their content. This study adopts the Semiotic Cultural Psychology Theory (SCPT) to analyze the stability of worldviews and their organizational structures. Through the analysis of data collected at three distinct time frames (2016, 2021 and 2022), the results showed that the content of worldviews in the Italian context maintained significant stability over time – although varying in incidence –, while their underlying structures demonstrated even greater stability. These results provide solid empirical support for SCPT and suggest new opportunities for the development of more effective measurement tools useful for analyzing the impact of symbolic universes and lines of semiotic force on cultural dynamics and human behavior.
AlessiatoE. P. C. (2022). What is worldview? A historical and critical analysis. Danish Institute for International Studies (DIIS). DIIS Working Paper, 2022(05).
2.
AndreassiS.SignoreF.CordellaB.De DominicisS.GennaroG.KerusauskaiteS.MannariniT.KosicA.RehoM.RochiraA.RocchiG.ScharfbilligM.SalvatoreS. (2023). Identity and symbolic universes in voting behavior. A study of the Italian society. Psychology Hub, 40(2), 69–80. https://doi.org/10.13133/2724-2943/17900
3.
BarrettL. F. (2006). Solving the emotion paradox: Categorization and the experience of emotion. Personality and Social Psychology Review: An Official Journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, 10(1), 20–46. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr1001_2
4.
BenzecriJ. P. (1992). Correspondence analysis handbook. CRC Press.
5.
BuhagiarL. J.SammutG.AvdiE.KoutriI.MylonaA.PopA.RochiraA.ReddR. R.SantarpiaA. (2020). Islam. In MannariniT.VeltriG. A.SalvatoreS. (Eds.), Media and social representations of otherness. Psycho-social-cultural implications (pp. 61–81). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-36099-3_4
CiavolinoE.ReddR.EvrinomyA.FalconeM.FiniV.KadianakiI.SalvatoreS. (2017). Views of context. An instrument for the analysis of the cultural milieu. A first validation study. Electronic Journal of Applied Statistical Analysis, 10(2), 599–628. https://doi.org/10.1285/i20705948v10n2p599
8.
ClayR. (2016). The ideological importance of worldview: An experimental investigation of the moderating effects of dangerous and competitive worldviews on ideological attitudes. Personality and Individual Differences, 99, 346–351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.05.012
9.
CordellaB.SignoreF.AndreassiS.De DominicisS.GennaroG.IusoS.MannariniT.KerusauskaiteS.KosicA.RehoM.RochiraA.RocchiG.SalvatoreS. (2023). How socio-institutional contexts and cultural worldviews relate to COVID-19 acceptance rates: A representative study in Italy. Social Science & Medicine, 320, 115671. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.115671
10.
CremaschiM.FiorettiC.MannariniM.SalvatoreS. (2021). Culture and policy-making. Pluralism, performativity and semiotic capital. Springer.
11.
De Luca PicioneR.MartiniE.CicchellaS.GermaniA.MaioE.DragoneM.VenuleoC. (2023). Different cyberbullying experiences and sensemaking processes about the sociocultural context. Mediterranean Journal of Clinical Psychology, 11(2), 1–34. https://doi.org/10.13129/2282-1619/mjcp-3766
12.
DouglasM. (1982). Introduction to grid/group analysis. In DouglasM. (Ed.), Essays in the sociology of perception (pp. 1–8). Routledge & Kegan Paul.
13.
DunbarK. N.FugelsangJ. A.SteinC. (2007). Do naïve theories ever go away? Using brain and behavior to understand changes in concepts. In LovettM. C.ShahP. (Eds.), Thinking with data (pp. 193–205). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
14.
EvansJ. D. (1996). Straightforward statistics for the behavioral sciences. Thomson Brooks/Cole Publishing Co.
15.
FawziN. (2019). Untrustworthy news and the media as “enemy of the people?” How a populist worldview shapes recipients’ attitudes toward the media. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 24(2), 146–164. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161218811981
16.
FerranteL.VenuleoC.SternativoG. A.RolloS.CheahJ. H.SalvatoreS.CiavolinoE. (2022). Relationship between view of context, psychosocial malaise and problematic internet use: Mediation analysis using partial least squares structural equation modelling. BJPsych Open, 8(4), Article e121. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2022.517
17.
FyockJ. A. (2007). The effect of the teacher’s worldviews on the worldviews of high school seniors. Liberty University.
18.
GoldbergR. M. (2009). How our worldviews shape our practice. Conflict Resolution Quarterly, 26(4), 405–431. https://doi.org/10.1002/crq.241
19.
HaferC. L.RubelA. N. (2015). The why and how of defending belief in a just world. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 51, 41–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.aesp.2014.09.001
20.
HeineS. J.ProulxT.VohsK. D. (2006). The meaning maintenance model: On the coherence of social motivations. Personality and Social Psychology Review: An Official Journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, 10(2), 88–110. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr1002_1
21.
InglehartR. F. (2018). Modernization, existential security, and cultural change. In GelfandM. J.ChiuC.HongY. (Eds.), Handbook of advances in culture and psychology (7, pp. 1–60). Oxford Academic. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190879228.003.0001
22.
InglehartR. F.WelzelC. (2005). Modernization, cultural change, and democracy: The human development sequence. Cambridge University Press.
23.
JostJ. T.GaucherD.SternC. (2015). “The world isn’t fair”: A system justification perspective on social stratification and inequality. In MikulincerM.ShaverP. R.DovidioJ. F.SimpsonJ. A. (Eds.), APA handbook of personality and social psychology Vol. 2 Group processes (pp. 317–340). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/14342-012
24.
KerušauskaitėS.RehoM.MannariniT. (2023). A tool to analyze the cultural milieu: View of context (VOC). In SalvatoreS.VeltriG. A.MannariniT. (Eds.), Methods and instruments in the study of meaning-making (pp. 127–153). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-21995-5_6
25.
KidderS. J.WeakleyK. C. (2021). Worldview origins―Part 1: The role of parents, media, and education. Journal of the Adventist Theological Society, 32(1), 4. https://digitalcommons.andrews.edu/jats/vol32/iss1/4
KosicA.AndreassiS.CordellaB.De DominicisS.GennaroA.IusoS.SalvatoreS.MannariniT.RehoM.RocchiG.RochiraA.SignoreF. (2023). Perceiving migrants as a threat: The role of the estimated number of migrants and symbolic universes. Genealogy, 7(4), 99. https://doi.org/10.3390/genealogy7040099
28.
LeungK.BondM. H.de CarrasquelS. R.MuñozC.HernándezM.MurakamiF.SingelisT. M.BierbrauerG. (2002). Social axioms: The search for universal dimensions of general beliefs about how the world functions. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 33(3), 286–302. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022102033003005
29.
MannariniT.RochiraA.CiavolinoE.RussoF.SalvatoreS. (2020). The demand for populism. A psycho-cultural based analysis of the desire for non mainstream political representation. Psychology Hub, 37(2), 31–39. https://doi.org/10.13133/2724-2943/17161
30.
MarinaciT.VenuleoC.FerranteL.Della BonaS. (2021). What game we are playing: The psychosocial context of problem gambling, problem gaming and poor well-being among Italian high school students. Heliyon, 7(8), e07872. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07872
31.
MazzaraB. M.AvdiE.KadianakiI.KoutriI.LanciaF.MannariniT.SalvatoreS.PopA.RochiraA.ReddR. E.SammutG.SuerdemA.VeltriG. A.VerbenaS. (2021). The representation of immigration. A retrospective newspaper analysis. Journal of Immigrant & Refugee Studies, 19(4), 436–455. https://doi.org/10.1080/15562948.2020.1836299
32.
McLeanG. N.BeigiM. (2016). The importance of worldviews on women’s leadership to HRD. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 18(2), 260–270. https://doi.org/10.1177/152342231664
33.
McMillanW. (2015). Theory in healthcare education research: The importance of worldview. In ClelandJ.DurningS. J. (Eds.), Researching medical education (pp. 15–24). John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118838983
MollaretP.CollangeJ.SternbergB.GasnaultA.BadeaC. (2023). Which immigrants are welcome: The role of worldview conflict and immigrants' social status. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 53(11), 1076–1087. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12996
36.
NewmanT. P.NisbetE. C.NisbetM. C. (2018). Climate change, cultural cognition, and media effects: Worldviews drive news selectivity, biased processing, and polarized attitudes. Public Understanding of Science, 27(8), 985–1002. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662518801170
OsgoodC. E.MayW. H.MironM. S. (1975). Cross-cultural universals of affective meaning. Illinois University Press.
39.
OsgoodC. E.SuciG. J.TannenbaumP. H. (1957). The measurement of meaning. University of Illinois Press.
40.
PopA.AvdiE.KadianakiI.KoutriI.MylonaA.RochiraA.SammutG.ReddR. R. (2020). Lgbt. In MannariniT.VeltriG. A.SalvatoreS. (Eds.), Media and social representations of otherness. Psycho-social-cultural implications (pp. 83–102). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-36099-3_5
41.
PoulinM. J.SilverR. C. (2019). When are assumptions shaken? A prospective, longitudinal investigation of negative life events and worldviews in a national sample. Journal of Research in Personality, 83, Article 103866. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2019.103866
42.
PyszczynskiT.SolomonS.GreenbergJ. (2015). Thirty years of terror management theory: From genesis to revelation. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 52, 1–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.aesp.2015.03.001
43.
RehoM. (2025). For “a meaning-centered, culturally oriented psychology” of climate change. Rivista Di Psicologia Clinica - Open Acces, (2), 46–70. https://doi.org/10.3280/rpc2-2024oa18838
44.
RehoM.BallarottoG.VelottiP.SalvatoreS. (in press). Managing climate crisis through the affects: A semiotic cultural perspective in the improving of pro-environmental behaviors. Current Psychology.
45.
RehoM.SalvatoreS. (2024). Redefining meaning: A micro-genetic model of the constitution of experience. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 58(3), 828–835. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-024-09849-5
46.
RehoM.VenezianiG.CiacchellaC.GennaroA.SalvatoreS.LaiC. (2024). The influence of cultural worldviews on the association between wildfire risk perception and preventive behaviors. Psychology Hub, 41(2), 71–79. https://doi.org/10.13133/2724-2943/18435
47.
RochiraA.AvdiE.KadianakiI.PopA.ReddR. R.SammutG.SuerdemA. (2020). Immigration. In MannariniT.VeltriG. A.SalvatoreS. (Eds.), Media and social representations of otherness. Psycho-social-cultural implications (pp. 39–59). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-36099-3_3
SalvatoreS. (2016a). Psychology in Black and white: The project of a theory-driven science. IAP.
50.
SalvatoreS. (2016b). The cultural psychology of desire. In ValsinerJ.MarsicoG.ChaudharyN.SatoT.DazzaniV. (Eds.), Psychology as the science of human being. Annales of theoretical psychology (pp. 33–49). Springer.
51.
SalvatoreS. (2018). Cultural psychology as the science of sensemaking: A semiotic-cultural framework for psychology. In RosaA.ValsinerJ. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of sociocultural psychology (2nd ed., pp. 35–48). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316662229.003
52.
SalvatoreS. (2019). Beyond the meaning given. The meaning as explanandum. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 53(4), 632–643. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-019-9472-z
53.
SalvatoreS.AvdiE.BattagliaF.Bernal-MarcosM. J.BuhagiarL. J.CiavolinoE.VeltriG. A. (2019b). Distribution and characteristics of symbolic universes over the European societies. In SalvatoreS.FiniV.MannariniT.ValsinerJ.VeltriG. A. (Eds.), Symbolic universes in time of (Post)Crisis. The future of European societies (pp. 135–170). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19497-0_4
54.
SalvatoreS.De Luca PicioneR.CozzolinoM.BochicchioV.PalmieriA. (2022). The role of affective sensemaking in the constitution of experience. The affective pertinentization model (APER). Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 56(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-020-09590-9
55.
SalvatoreS.FiniV.MannariniT.SuerdemA.VeltriG. A. (2020). The salience of otherness. In MannariniT.VeltriG. A.SalvatoreS. (Eds.), Media and social representations of otherness. Psycho-social-cultural implications (pp. 103–131). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-36099-3_6
56.
SalvatoreS.FiniV.MannariniT.VeltriG. A.AvdiE.BattagliaCastro-TejerinaJ.CiavolinoE.CremaschiM.KadianakiI.KharlamovN. A.KrastevaA.KullaseppK.MatsopoulosA.MeschiariC.MossiP.PsinasP.ReddR.RochiraA.Re.Cri.Re. Consortium. (2018). Symbolic universes between present and future of Europe. First results of the map of European societies’ cultural milieu. PLoS One, 13(1), Article e0189885. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0189885
57.
SalvatoreS.FredaM. F. (2011). Affect, unconscious and sensemaking. A psychodynamic, semiotic and dialogic model. New Ideas in Psychology, 29(2), 119–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newideapsych.2010.06.001
58.
SalvatoreS.PalmieriA.PicioneR. D. L.BochicchioV.RehoM.SerioM. R.SalvatoreG. (2024). The affective grounds of the mind. The affective pertinentization (APER) model. Physics of Life Reviews, 50(3), 143–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plrev.2024.07.008
59.
SalvatoreS.ValsinerJ.VeltriG. A. (2019a). The theoretical and methodological framework. Semiotic cultural psychology, symbolic universes and lines of semiotic forces. In SalvatoreS.FiniV.MannariniT.ValsinerJ.VeltriG. A. (Eds.), Symbolic universes in time of (Post)Crisis. The future of European societies (pp. 25–49). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19497-0_2
60.
SalvatoreS.ZittounT. (Eds.), (2011). Cultural psychology and psychoanalysis: Pathways to synthesis. IAP Information Age Publishing.
61.
SammutG.MifsudR.BrockdorffN. (2022). The role of worldviews in predicting support for recreational cannabis. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, Article 880537. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.880537
62.
SammutG.SartawiM.BauerM. W.MifsudR. (2024). Worldviews, attitudes to science and science policy in Kuwait: The engagement and mobilisation effects. Research & Politics, 11(4), Article 20531680241297669. https://doi.org/10.1177/20531680241297669
63.
ShiJ.VisschersV. H.SiegristM. (2015). Public perception of climate change: The importance of knowledge and cultural worldviews. Risk Analysis: An Official Publication of the Society for Risk Analysis, 35(12), 2183–2201. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.12406
64.
TavesA. (2022). Worldview analysis as a tool for conflict resolution. Negotiation Journal, 38(3), 363–381. https://doi.org/10.1111/nejo.12403
65.
TilburtJ.GellerG. (2007). The importance of worldviews for medical education. Academic Medicine: Journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges, 82(8), 819–822. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e3180d098cc
66.
TriandisH. C. (1995). Individualism & collectivism. Westview Press.
67.
TwengeJ. M.CampbellW. K.GentileB. (2013). Changes in pronoun use in American books and the rise of individualism, 1960-2008. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 44(3), 406–415. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022112455100
68.
ValsinerJ. (2007). Culture in minds and societies: Foundations of cultural psychology: Sage.
69.
VardanegaA. (2007). L’analisi delle corrispondenze. In CannavòL.FrudàL. (Eds.), Dall’analisi esplorativa al data mining (pp. 89–113). Carocci.
VeltriG. A.ReddR.MannariniT.SalvatoreS. (2019). The identity of brexit: A cultural psychology analysis. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 29(1), 18–31. https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.2378
72.
VenuleoC.MarinaciT.GennaroA.PalmieriA. (2020). The meaning of living in the time of COVID-19. A large sample narrative inquiry. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, Article 577077. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.577077
73.
VenuleoC.MossiP.RolloS. (2019). The social-cultural context of risk evaluation. An exploration of the interplay between cultural models of the social environment and parental control on the risk evaluation expressed by a sample of adolescents. Psicologia Della Salute, (3), 28–53. https://doi.org/10.3280/PDS2019-003003
74.
WolmanB. B. (Ed.), (1973). Dictionary of behavioral science. Van Nostrand Reinhold.
75.
WoltersE. A. (2023). Homeowner firewise behaviors in fire-prone central Oregon: An exploration of the attitudinal, situational, and cultural worldviews impacting pre-fire mitigation actions. Journal of Environmental Management, 327, Article 116811. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116811
ZajoncR. B. (2000). Feeling and thinking: Closing the debate over the independence of affect. In ForgasJ. P. (Ed.), Feeling and thinking: The role of affect in social cognition (pp. 31–58). Cambridge University Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
