The purpose of this paper is to rethink the topic of freedom for contemporary psychology. Freedom, within psychological research today, is a neglected, even slightly old-fashioned term. In this paper, we explore the practical, normative, and political dimensions of freedom as a psychological concept. We begin by tracing out key understandings of freedom from political theory, before discussing how thinkers such as Skinner, Maslow, Fromm, and May understood the different dimensions of freedom. We then discuss a governmental perspective on freedom, drawn from the work of Nikolas Rose, before finally turning to the sociocultural psychology of L. S. Vygotsky. We contend that freedom is not merely the absence of constraints but a complex interplay between agency, responsibility, and social connections. Our paper argues that the modern emphasis on negative freedom, characterized by reduced interference and obligations, has resulted in a paradoxical situation where individuals feel overwhelmed and seek escape from freedom. By revisiting the insights of Erich Fromm and other scholars, we emphasize the need for positive freedom, which involves voluntary connections with others and active participation in shaping society. We argue that psychology’s mandate should be to facilitate the exploration of alternative avenues that lead to flourishing and self-actualization.
BerlinI. (1969). Four essays on liberty, Oxford University Press.
3.
BridgmanT.CummingsS.BallardJ. (2019). Who built Maslow’s pyramid? A history of the creation of management studies’ most famous symbol and its implications for management education. The Academy of Management Learning and Education, 18(1), 81–98. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2017.0351
4.
BrinkmannS. (2010a). The ethical subject: Accountability, authorship, and practical reason.
5.
BrinkmannS. (2010b). Psychology as a moral science: Perspectives on normativity, Springer Science & Business Media.
ConstantB. (1988/1819). The liberty of ancients compared with that of moderns. In FontanaB. (Ed.), Constant: Political Writings (pp. 308–328). Cambridge University Press.
8.
De BeauvoirS. (2018). The ethics of ambiguity, Open Road Media.
9.
ElkinsD. N. (2009). Why humanistic psychology lost its power and influence in American psychology: Implications for advancing humanistic psychology. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 49(3), 267–291. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022167808323575
10.
FancherR. E.RutherfordA. (2017). Pioneers of psychology (5th), W. W. Norton.
11.
FrommE. (2020a/1941). Flugten fra friheden [Escape from Freedom]. Hans Reitzels Forlag.
12.
FrommE. (2020b/1955). Det sunde samfund [the sane society]. Hans Reitzels Forlag.
13.
GoldsteinK. (1995) [1934]. The organism. Zone Books.
14.
GreenwoodJ. D. (2015). A conceptual history of psychology: Exploring the tangled web, Cambridge University Press.
RatnerP. (1998). Prologue. Dynamics and structure of the adolescent’s personality. In RieberR. W. (Ed.), The Collected Works of L.S. Vygotsky: Volume 5 (pp. v–xv). New York: Plenum Press.
23.
ReyF. G. (2011). A Re-examination of defining moments in Vygotsky’s work and their implications for his continuing legacy. Mind, Culture and Activity, 18(3), 257–275. https://doi.org/10.1080/10749030903338517
RutherfordA. (2009). Beyond the box: B.F. Skinner’s technology of behaviour from laboratory to life, 1950s-1970s: University of Toronto Press.
31.
RutherfordA. (2017). BF Skinner and technology’s nation: Technocracy, social engineering, and the good life in 20th-century America. History of Psychology, 20(3), 290–312. https://doi.org/10.1037/hop0000062
32.
SartreJ. P. (1963). Saint genet: Actor and martyr, trans. Bernard frechtman. George Braziller.
33.
SartreJ. P. (1972). The itinerary of thought. Jean-Paul Sartre: Between existentialism and marxism: Verso Books. J. Matthews (trans.),.
34.
SkinnerB. F. (1953). Science and human behavior, The Free Press.
VeresovN. (2005). Marxist and non-Marxist aspects of the cultural-historical psychology of L.S. Vygotsky. Outlines, 7(1), 31–49. https://doi.org/10.7146/ocps.v7i1.2110
39.
VeresovN. (2009). Forgotten methodology – Vygotsky’s case. In ToomelaA.ValsinerJ. (Eds.), Methodological thinking in psychology: 60 Years gone astray? (pp. 267–295), Information Age Publishing.
40.
VineyD. W. (1986). William James on free will and determinism. The Journal of Mind and Behavior, 7(4), 555–565.
41.
VitzP. C. (1994). Psychology as religion: The cult of self-worship, Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing.
42.
VygotskyL. (1997). Self-control. In RieberR. W. (Ed.) The Collected Works of L.S. Vygotsky. Volume 4. (pp.207–221). Hall, M. (Transl.). Plenum Press.
43.
VygotskyL. (1998a). Development of higher mental functions during the transitional age. In RieberR. W. (Ed.), The collected works of L.S. Vygotsky. (Volume 5, pp. 83–149), Plenum Press. Hall, M. (Transl.).
44.
VygotskyL. (1998b). Dynamics and structure of the adolescent’s personality. In RieberR. W. (Ed.), The collected works of L.S. Vygotsky (Volume 5, pp. 167–187), Plenum Press. Hall, M. (Transl.).
45.
VygotskyL. (1998c). Sign operations and organization of mental processes. In RieberR. W. (Ed.) The Collected Works of L.S. VygotskyVolume 6 (pp.39–45). Hall, M. (Transl.)Plenum Press.
46.
WagonerB. (2011). Meaning construction in remembering: A synthesis of bartlett and Vygotsky. In Theoretical psychology: Global transformations and challenges (pp. 105–114), Captus Press.
47.
WatsonJ. B. (1913). Psychology as the behaviorist views it. Psychological review, 20(2), 158.
48.
WatsonJ. B. (1924). Behaviorism. New York: W. W. Norton & Company, Inc.
