Individuals psychologically process their experiences while involved in dialogue in daily situations. In psychotherapeutic sessions, we can appreciate the ongoing process of constructing meaning when focusing on a microgenetic level during the exchange of child and therapist. We examine an excerpt from a therapeutic process with a sexually abused child from a socio-genetic perspective, with a focus on the display of semiotic fields, meaning growth and balancing tension and as a mean to deal with the painful consequences. Self-regulatory mechanisms are displayed in dialogical chains, providing insight into processing strategies to cope with a traumatic experience. Ambivalence and tension are essential to elaborate new meanings as well as a therapist willing to accompany the child.
AbbeyE. (2004). Circumventing ambivalence in identity: The importance of latent and overt aspects of symbolic meaning. Culture and Psychology, 10(3), 331–336. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354067x04042891
2.
AbbeyE.ValsinerJ. (2005a). Emergence of meanings through ambivalence. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 6(1), art, 23. https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-6.1.515.
3.
AbbeyE.ValsinerJ. (2005b). The making of somebody else: Diagnostic labels, educational practices, and meaning-making. European Journal of School Psychology, 3(1), 83–99.
4.
BakhtinM. (1981). The dialogic imagination. Four essays. University of Texas Press.
5.
BakhtinM. (1986). The problem of speech genres. In BakhtinM. M. (Ed.), Speech genres and other late essays. University of Texas Press.
6.
BergsonH. (1932). Materia y Memoria. Ensayo sobre la relación de cuerpo con el espíritu. Obras Escogidas. Aguilar.
7.
CloitreM.StolbachB. C.HermanJ. L.van der KolkB.PynoosR.WangJ.PetkovaE. (2009). A developmental approach to complex PTSD: Childhood and adult cumulative trauma as predictors of symptom complexity. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 22(5), 399–408. https://doi.org/10.1002/jts.20444
8.
CollinsS.MarkováI. (1995). Complementarity in the construction of a problematic utterance in conversation. In MarkováI.GraumannC. G.GraumannC. F.FoppaK. (Eds.), Mutualities in dialogues. Cambridge University Press.
9.
D’AndreaW.FordJ.StolbachB.SpinazzolaJ.Van der KolkB. A. (2012). Understanding interpersonal trauma in children: Why we need a developmentally appropriate trauma diagnosis. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 82(2), 187–200. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1939-0025.2012.01154.x
10.
FossaP.MolinaM. E. (2017). Momentos de debilitamiento del vínculo terapéutico: Un estudio de micro-proceso. Revista Argentina de Clinica Psicologica, 26(1), 31–46. https://doi.org/10.24205/03276716.2017.1003
11.
FossaP.MolinaM. E.de la PuertaS.BarrM.Tapia-VillanuevaL. (2016). What do we do when we discuss? A micro-genetic analysis of couples’ conflict. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Family Therapy, 37(1), 105–118. https://doi.org/10.1002/anzf.1136
12.
GeeJ. P. (2007). Cross-cutting themes: Reflections on assessment from a sociocultural-situated perspective. The Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, 106(1), 362–375, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7984.2007.00109.x
13.
GumperzJ. (1995). Mutual inferencing in conversation. In MarkováI., GraumannC. G.GraumannC. F.FoppaK. (Eds.), Mutualities in dialogue (pp. 101–103). Cambridge University Press.
14.
HermansH. J. (2019). Dialogical self theory in a boundary-crossing society. In AlmaH.ter AvestI. (Eds.), Moral and spiritual leadership in an age of plural moralities (pp. 27–47). Routledge.
15.
JosephsI.ValsinerJ.SurganE. (1999). The process of meaning construction: Dissecting the flow of semiotic activity. In BrandtstädterJ.LernerR. M. (Eds) Action and self- development. Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452204802
16.
JosephsI. E.ValsinerJ. (1998). How does autodialogue work? Miracles of meaning maintenance and circumvention strategies. Social Psychology Quarterly, 61(1), 68–83. https://doi.org/10.2307/2787058
17.
LawrenceJ. A.ValsinerJ. (2003). Making personal sense: An account of basic internalization and externalization processes. Theory and Psychology, 13(6), 723–752. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354303136001
18.
LeimanM. (1998). Words as intersubjective mediators in psychotherapeutic discourse: The presence of hidden voices in patient utterances. In LähteenmäkiM.DufvaH. (Eds.), Dialogues on Bakhtin: Interdisciplinary readings (pp. 106–117). University of Jyväskylä, Centre for Applied Language Studies.
19.
MarkováI. (2016). The dialogical mind: Common sense and ethics. Cambridge University Press.
20.
MiltenburgR.SingerE. (2000). A concept becomes a passion: Moral commitments and the affective development of the survivors of child abuse. Theory and Psychology, 10(4), 503–526. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354300104004
21.
MolenaarP. C. M. (2004). A manifesto on psychology as idiographic science: Bringing the person back into scientific psychology, this time forever. Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research & Perspective, 2(4), 201–218.https://doi.org/10.1207/s15366359mea0204_1
22.
MolinaM. E.del RíoM. T. (2007). Child sexual abuse interpretation as a sign-construction process. Culture and Psychology, 13(1), 29–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354067x07069954
23.
MolinaM. E.Del RíoM. T. (2009). Dynamics of psychotherapy processes. In ValsinerJ.MolenaarP.LyraM.ChaudharyN. (Eds.), Dynamic process methodology in the social and developmental sciences. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-95922-1_10
24.
MolinaM. E.Del RioM. T.VillanuevaL. T. (2015). El diálogo en la psicoterapia: Protocolo para un análisis de micro-proceso. Revista Argentina de Clinica Psicologica, 24(2), 121–132.
25.
RibeiroA. P.GonçalvesM. M. (2011). Maintenance and transformation of problematic self-narratives: A semiotic-dialogical approach. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 45, 281–303. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-010-9149-0.
26.
RoberP. (2017). Addressing the person of the therapist in supervision: The therapist’s inner conversation method. Family Process, 56(2), 487–500. https://doi.org/10.1111/famp.12220
27.
SawyerR. K. (2002). Unresolved tensions in sociocultural theory: Analogies with contemporary sociological debates. Culture and Psychology, 8(3), 283–305, https://doi.org/10.1177/1354067x02008003838
28.
SeikkulaJ.ArnkilT. E. (2019). Diálogos abiertos y anticipaciones terapéuticas: Respetando la alteridad en el momento presente. Herder Editorial.
ValsinerJ. (2004b). The promoter sign: Development transformation within the structure of dialogical self. Developmental aspects of the dialogical self. ISSBD.
31.
ValsinerJ. (2005a). Soziale und emotionale entwicklungsaufgaben im kulturellen kontex. In ASendorpfJ.RauhH. (Eds.) Enzyklpadie der psychologie (vol. 3). Hogrefe.
32.
ValsinerJ. (2005). Scaffolding within the structure of dialogical self: Hierarchical dynamics of semiotic mediation. New Ideas in Psychology23(3): 197–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newideapsych.2006.06.001
33.
ValsinerJ. (1997). Culture and the development of children’s actions. A theory of human development (2nd ed.) John Wiley and Sons.
34.
ValsinerJ. (2002). Forms of dialogical relations and semiotic autoregulation within the self. Theory and Psychology, 12(2), 251–265. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354302012002633
35.
VoloshinovV. N. (1973). Marxism and the philosophy of language. The Harvard University Press.
36.
WertschJ. (1988). Vygotsky y la formación social de la mente. Paidós.
37.
WertschJ. (1991). Voices of the mind: A sociocultural approach to mediated action. Harvard University Press.
